Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [18 votes]: Would you rather
  • Poll [18 votes]: Would you rather
Subject: Would you rather

Poll: Would you rather  [closed]
have bungie focus on physics?:  56%
(10 Votes)
Or on graphics and FPS?:  44%
(8 Votes)
Total Votes: 18

I'm aking if you'd rather have better physics (like fire, explosives, water and ragdolls?) Or have them focus on graphics and FPS (frames per second?)

  • 10.16.2009 5:08 PM PDT

Posted by: urk
Eat raw meat.
Punch a bear in the face.


If you don't know who I am, the feeling is mutual.

Wouldn't physics be covered under graphics?

  • 10.16.2009 5:10 PM PDT

Posted by: RabidNutCase45
Wouldn't physics be covered under graphics?

No, graphics is the amount of pixels and how fast they switch between slides and physics are how realistic an explosian or flame or destructability in vehicles.

  • 10.16.2009 5:15 PM PDT

Enough with the messages,
I don't want to join your stupid groups.

Posted by: Eagleznest
Posted by: RabidNutCase45
Wouldn't physics be covered under graphics?

No, graphics is the amount of pixels and how fast they switch between slides and physics are how realistic an explosian or flame or destructability in vehicles.


That's not what physics is...
Physics is things like ragdoll and gravity, items colliding with each other and how they should react and so on.
It has nothing to do with destructibility. Or fire.

  • 10.16.2009 5:20 PM PDT

Frames per Second is useful. Graphics not so much. Physics are fun though.

  • 10.16.2009 5:21 PM PDT

Posted by: Hylebos
Frames per Second is useful. Graphics not so much. Physics are fun though.

What makes FPS useful? Just wondering.

  • 10.16.2009 5:24 PM PDT

Look out.... -boom- (headshot)
I told you to look out, but know, you got in my way, was going to shoot that splaser....

The better your FPS is, the less likely you are to lag.

  • 10.16.2009 5:28 PM PDT

Posted by: Cynisperer
The better your FPS is, the less likely you are to lag.

What, that didn't make much sense.

  • 10.16.2009 5:41 PM PDT

Posted by: Eagleznest
Posted by: Hylebos
Frames per Second is useful. Graphics not so much. Physics are fun though.

What makes FPS useful? Just wondering.

Well you need to have FPS to have awesome things happen, otherwise things get laggy.

[Edited on 10.16.2009 5:52 PM PDT]

  • 10.16.2009 5:51 PM PDT

Posted by: Hylebos
Posted by: Eagleznest
Posted by: Hylebos
Frames per Second is useful. Graphics not so much. Physics are fun though.

What makes FPS useful? Just wondering.

Well you need to have FPS to have awesome things happen, otherwise things get laggy.

Well yes but aren't they fine as they are now?

  • 10.16.2009 5:53 PM PDT

Uhh... this is a tough question to be asked. Where is the "Both" option or the "Other" option? People can't be asked a question like this that they can't answer very well with two simple 'yes' or 'no' (paraphrasing) options.

  • 10.16.2009 5:54 PM PDT

Posted by: WAR HOROR13
Uhh... this is a tough question to be asked. Where is the "Both" option or the "Other" option? People can't be asked a question like this that they can't answer very well with two simple 'yes' or 'no' (paraphrasing) options.

What are you more strongly drawn to? Graphics or physics?

  • 10.16.2009 5:56 PM PDT

get out of here stalker

Posted by: WAR HOROR13
Uhh... this is a tough question to be asked. Where is the "Both" option or the "Other" option? People can't be asked a question like this that they can't answer very well with two simple 'yes' or 'no' (paraphrasing) options.
It's meant to test you, of course.
I want bungie to make a physics manipulator in forge!

  • 10.16.2009 5:57 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Senior Legendary Member

Posted by: BTE
Posted by: Xharpan
it doese'nt look nextgen , looks good but not nextgen
If by next-gen you mean crappy, dark and colorless, I agree. It doesnt look next-gen at all.

Physics? I want them to focus more on AI.

  • 10.16.2009 6:04 PM PDT