Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: This can not be halo 4, save halo 4 for later
  • Subject: This can not be halo 4, save halo 4 for later
Subject: This can not be halo 4, save halo 4 for later

This game`s multiplayer should not be anything like halo 3.
I want something new. no 4v4 based playlists, none. i say there should be 3v5 playlists, thats right. 3 spartans vs 5 covenant playlists. spartan team is like normal halo, covenant team is made up of 2 grunts, 2 jackals and a brute. cov team has cov weapons, spartans have human weapons which can interchange after deaths occur. this may sound crazy but do we really want halo 4 next year with 16 new maps and a couple new weapons/vehicles? i dont, i can play halo 3 for a couple more years, or maybe i cant. i just think halo reach should not follow the same multiplayer set up as H3, we need somethin really new.

  • 10.17.2009 3:18 AM PDT

Yeah, I was thinking about that a long time ago! But I don't think they'll gonna do that

  • 10.17.2009 3:25 AM PDT

The original BADFINGER! (the second)

Posted by: Whyte Spyder
This game`s multiplayer should not be anything like halo 3.
I want something new. no 4v4 based playlists, none. i say there should be 3v5 playlists, thats right. 3 spartans vs 5 covenant playlists. spartan team is like normal halo, covenant team is made up of 2 grunts, 2 jackals and a brute. cov team has cov weapons, spartans have human weapons which can interchange after deaths occur. this may sound crazy but do we really want halo 4 next year with 16 new maps and a couple new weapons/vehicles? i dont, i can play halo 3 for a couple more years, or maybe i cant. i just think halo reach should not follow the same multiplayer set up as H3, we need somethin really new.


Seriously if you want so many changes, maybe you should consider moving onto another game, since Halo no longer has what you desire.

Halos multiplayer is what makes if the KING of all FPS multiplayer games.
You want 3v5?? what about 4v50.... its called 'Fire Fight'.

But that being said Halo Reach i think will be pretty much the same but even more refined. Is Halo Reach Halo4??....no. Save Halo 4 the next generation of consoles, i think putting the Halo franchise on hold for 5 years is a smarter thing to do rather than milking it.
Thats why i personally think Bungie wanting to move onto a new IP after Reach is such a good idea. just because they want o make a new IP doesnt mean they still dont have plans for future Halo Stories, regardless of what you read on the internet, i think it is a safe bet to assume Bungie aint done with Halo in a long shot.

[Edited on 10.17.2009 3:41 AM PDT]

  • 10.17.2009 3:40 AM PDT

Bacon

Bungie will never change halo like that.
Why?
They might lose money on it, so they will stick to normal halo style which will guarantee them alot of cash.

  • 10.17.2009 3:42 AM PDT

The original BADFINGER! (the second)

Posted by: EliteForce 115
Bungie will never change halo like that.
Why?
They might lose money on it, so they will stick to normal halo style which will guarantee them alot of cash.
Exactly

If it aint broke dont fix it. thats my motto.

  • 10.17.2009 3:45 AM PDT

1.Arkham Asylum, 2.Mass Effect, 3.Halo CE, 4.Mass Effect 2, 5.Halo 2, 6.Splinter Cell Double Agent, 7.Gears of War 2, 8.Medievil, 9.Oblivion, 10.Crash Team Racing

If we wouldn't have "fixed" anything, we'd still play Pong, Doom or whatever.

As for topic. This is exactly what I'd like to see. We've already seen Spartans fighting each other for so long. There is only so much you can do to it anymore. Covenant is what makes Halo unique.

If Multiplayer was like an extension to campaign, I could like it a lot more. I already have tons of "Brutes VS Elites, Humans VS Covies..." maps, but because everyone is a Spartan or Elite and it's only custom games, it doesn't feel like much.

But seeing how Bungie calls Valhalla with Ghosts and Banshees "Covies" and people still hate it, I can't see this happening. Majority wants human and balance.

  • 10.17.2009 3:54 AM PDT