Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: 32-player Co-Op
  • Subject: 32-player Co-Op
Subject: 32-player Co-Op
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Reach should Have Much more massive Battlegrounds, I mean come on, Bungie should make us experince reach, ALL OVER THE PLANET. :)
I won't even get into detail on the maximum numbers of players in Campaign. Oh God XD.

  • 10.17.2009 2:58 PM PDT

32 player co-op? some kids just dont get it

  • 10.17.2009 3:04 PM PDT

If you think world at war is 80% crap well.. your brain is only functioning at 80% because it is indeed 100% crap

Epic Lag

  • 10.17.2009 3:05 PM PDT

32 player co-op is a pretty stupid idea c'mon really?

32 player 18 per-team PvP match making sounds more realistic but damn that'll probably lag to hell.

  • 10.17.2009 3:06 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

(-_-) Bored Face

If they can do it without lag I still don't see how so many players would work in campagin.

  • 10.17.2009 3:07 PM PDT

Posted by: Dallas Green
I make a legitimate thread on the most logical choice for the next Bond actor, and you take that away from me by creating a parody thread indirectly connecting my thread to yours.

I hope your kids have bad influences and develop bad personalities. I wish this with all my heart.

Considering all of the problems that 4-p fire fight brought, hell no. If they want to do a massive PvP co-op mode, doing it like Star Wars Battlefront or L4D would be the best bet. Check the second most recent weekly update for Bungie's detailed explanation of the different networking styles between deathmatches and campaign/firefight.

  • 10.17.2009 3:10 PM PDT

Posted by: BrokeL
Epic Lag

true...we need better xboxs to b able to handle it and also raise the basic lvl of internet so instead of every one having decent internet it needs to b T3 for evey one...if not EPIC fail

  • 10.17.2009 3:12 PM PDT

The only way this could be even remotely possible, is if Reach gets a couple dedicated servers.

  • 10.17.2009 5:00 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Intrepid Member
  • gamertag: nuchey
  • user homepage:

RAWR!

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32

Ok now that you have a better feel of the number 32 OP do you think it would seriously work? forget about lag and the even how that many people would talk wityhout having to shout over eachother, could you really imagine doing any halo level with this many people to be fun? i would find it very evry easy! and boring!

  • 10.17.2009 5:06 PM PDT

If you have played ODST, you would know that lag on a campaign map can be horrible even with two people with good connections. Thirty-two people is asking for trouble.

[Edited on 10.17.2009 5:09 PM PDT]

  • 10.17.2009 5:07 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Sorry typo, Didn't mean CO-OP

I meant More people in PvP,
Sleepy when I typed This :)
and the Server thing isn't so bad.

  • 10.17.2009 6:27 PM PDT

Posted by: urk
Eat raw meat.
Punch a bear in the face.


If you don't know who I am, the feeling is mutual.

Still, that does seem like a lot of people to try and coordinate with.

Unless Bungie seriously messes with Halo's formula, 32 players would be way too much. 32 would work better in a game like Battlefield, but not Halo.

  • 10.17.2009 6:32 PM PDT

Posted by: Chardy Wolfe
Posted by: BrokeL
Epic Lag

true...we need better xboxs to b able to handle it and also raise the basic lvl of internet so instead of every one having decent internet it needs to b T3 for evey one...if not EPIC fail


Well its not the Xbox its self that cant handle that many players without lag. Its about Xbox Live and personal networks, and distance from other players. And if your gonna say the internet connection needs to be T3, you better be willing to pay for it.

T3 is not cheap...at all. And with that connection you need some of the best internet equipment to run it all smoothly. If your willing to send everyone a nice check for T3 and new equipment, then by all means, T3 for all!

  • 10.17.2009 6:33 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Intrepid Mythic Member
  • gamertag: bob570
  • user homepage:

R.I.P. Halo 2
11/9/04 - 4/15/10

- B( )B

I don't think you understand that this is physically impossible. The Xbox 360 does not have what it takes to have 32 players on the same map at the same time which is big enough to fit an entire army of Covenant, while running all that AI.


Posted by: Zerofuse100
Sorry typo, Didn't mean CO-OP

I meant More people in PvP,
Sleepy when I typed This :)
and the Server thing isn't so bad.

This may be possible, not sure.


[Edited on 10.17.2009 7:18 PM PDT]

  • 10.17.2009 7:09 PM PDT

This isn't World of Warcarft!

  • 10.17.2009 7:49 PM PDT