Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: 343 studios?
  • Subject: 343 studios?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: 343 studios?
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I agree.KOTOR 2 wasn't as good as KOTOR 1.Ensemble did a bad job like they did Halo Wars.

  • 11.09.2009 4:15 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

if its not bungie its not halo

  • 11.09.2009 4:16 AM PDT

Posted by: ShadowFeaR
I just want to let you know that 343 Studios WILL not make games. They're all about Halo information specializing in comics, books, podcasts, etc.


That's not fact, that's presumption. In any actual interviews, like the lead of 343, he says they're not going to develop for now.

I take that to mean until after Reach is out, as it would obviously conflict sales within the same title/brand.

  • 11.09.2009 7:50 AM PDT

Rock + Metal = Life
Simple math

It isn't bad with developer changes all the time. I have heared from many people that Far Cry 2 was way better the first (for the players who don't know, the makers of far cry 1 sold the rights to ubisoft, they made far cry 2), even though I have not played far cry 1 I gues it isn't impossible that Halo will get bad, it is possible that it stays good...

  • 11.09.2009 7:58 AM PDT

Signatures are for squares.

Posted by: I Intrepid I
keep in mind 343 is behind "Halo legends" and look where that is taking the series? We get spartan robots, spartan gundams, Spartans getting chased by dinosaurs. They get to call what is and isnt cannon after Reach. Its only a matter of time before this game gets milked of its story to no end. Halo is superposed to be a mature grim story, now we got This

I'll hang my hat up on halo after reach, this will be the end of the story for me.


Oh boo who. Those are all from a satirical non canon look on the Halo universe.

  • 11.09.2009 8:03 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2