- Fos Tis Krisis
- |
- Intrepid Legendary Member
I hunt for the Prophet of Contentment, the San 'Shyumm that murdered my son, and stole his birthright, his Energy Sword. They call our species Heretics. They claim to all that our tongues sting, our words a vile poison that feeds on the unworthy. I have seen the true face of Heresy. The head of a gallant warrior lay on the ground. His neck scorched and blistered, scarred by his own blade. I shall retrieve the weapon, and drive it through that bastard's heart! Punishment for his sins is nigh.
Posted by: The BS Police
I've been seeing alot of complaints about the BR for awhile. Everyone is saying as if it were a fact that the BR ruined weapon balance in Halo 2 and Halo 3 which is not true.
The thing that destroyed weapon balance in Halo 2 and Halo 3 was Dual Weilding. By adding Dual Weilding various weapons were nerfed (Plasma Pistol. Magnum, Plasma Rifle, Halo 2 Needler, etc.), but as ODST proved removing Dual Weilding can make things better.
If Dual Weilding was not in Halo 2 and Halo 3 chances are that the BR wouldn't be the "go to" weapon that it currently is (or not as much so) since various weapons would have a decent amount of fire power and accuracy instead of being useless for everything but close range combat.
The Halo 3 Needler and the Sound supressed SMG is proof enough of that.
I will also add that Grenades would be more effective like they were in Halo 1, the Shotgun could have a bit more range, and the Rocket Luancher would finnaly do a decent amount of splash damage like in Halo 1.
My point is, for the betterment of this game, Dual Weilding should not be in this game.
Yeah, your wrong about that bud. The truth is they only compensate for Dual Wield WHILE YOU ARE DOING IT. Weapons are powerful enough to be guns on their own without it. (Want proof? When you use a single magnum it is 5 shot kill, dual wielding it becomes 7 shot.)
An SMG, Spiker, and PR single wield are all more effective than an AR. Just letting you know.