Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: br idea
  • Subject: br idea
Subject: br idea

am i the only one that thinks that the BR (assuming there will be one in reach) should be able to switch between burst mode and semi-automatic mode. the semi-auto made would be like the automag. is this a good idea?

[Edited on 10.20.2009 11:43 AM PDT]

  • 10.20.2009 11:43 AM PDT

[Insert Catchy Phrase here]

Yeah I guess the only button that could do it would be select though

  • 10.20.2009 11:56 AM PDT

Posted by: splatter ghost
Yeah I guess the only button that could do it would be select though

What about if you held LT and RT together for 1 full second?

  • 10.20.2009 12:17 PM PDT

i was thinking that if you held lb and rb

  • 10.20.2009 12:37 PM PDT

I have the greates fix for the BR!
We get rid of it!
That way we solve all the problems of the Reach forum over flowing with "I KNOW HOW TO FIX THE BR" threads.
Then we ban anyone who says "Bungie, put the BR in Reach"

  • 10.20.2009 12:39 PM PDT

Nah, turbo controllers would kill it.
And if there's a limit on how fast you can fire, that means you get a weapon a lot worse than a carbine.

[Edited on 10.20.2009 12:44 PM PDT]

  • 10.20.2009 12:44 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

the M7, MA5, And BR55 Weapons do have fire selection switches like Land Fall, but a full Auto BR would replace the MA5 witch is appropriate in the latter games i thought the BR replaced the MA5 for good in halo 2, the MA5 fire a 500 year old round the BR fire 9.5x40 with some future propellant

however then each weapon would have to be re Balanced

I do like the Idea of fire selection, however Bungie also already emphasizes short controlled burst.

however i really think A spartan should be able to at least keep round on the center of mass at 50m in Auto fire

  • 10.20.2009 12:46 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: DanSquidgeon
Nah, turbo controllers would kill it.
And if there's a limit on how fast you can fire, that means you get a weapon a lot worse than a carbine.


however i would not Mind the OPTION to Have a HUMAN semi auto weapon

i think the Carbine should be better then the BR in general, it an Alien gun far more advanced then the UNMCs simple ballistics,

even with the disadvantages i would use the BR

  • 10.20.2009 12:49 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Senior Mythic Member

Proud frenchie, elite fan, anthro artist not hellbent on yiff convention/pics/whatever, mature and intelligent forum guy, 4chaner, halo 2 lover and halo 3 hater.

Posted by: BIGNERENT
I have the greates fix for the BR!
We get rid of it!
That way we solve all the problems of the Reach forum over flowing with "I KNOW HOW TO FIX THE BR" threads.
Then we ban anyone who says "Bungie, put the BR in Reach"



I have an even better idea :
you leave the forums forever.

  • 10.20.2009 12:49 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Senior Legendary Member

Posted by: BTE
Posted by: Xharpan
it doese'nt look nextgen , looks good but not nextgen
If by next-gen you mean crappy, dark and colorless, I agree. It doesnt look next-gen at all.

Woo hoo, another BR thread. As to the OP suggestion, why would anyone want to go from burst to semi-auto? The burst doesn't screw up your aim anyways so why would you need semi-auto for?

  • 10.20.2009 1:57 PM PDT
  • gamertag: VFoS
  • user homepage:

D-pad

  • 10.20.2009 1:58 PM PDT

http://www.planethamachi.com/net_detail.php?&net_detail=H alo+2+FM1

PeTo all you people that dont like the br, get used to it or just hope Bungie balances it.

  • 10.20.2009 1:59 PM PDT

1.Arkham Asylum, 2.Mass Effect, 3.Halo CE, 4.Mass Effect 2, 5.Halo 2, 6.Splinter Cell Double Agent, 7.Gears of War 2, 8.Medievil, 9.Oblivion, 10.Crash Team Racing

Carbine + better?

BR could just be more rare. Only in 1 or 2 campaign missions and on 1 or 2 MP maps by default. BR fans could add more them through Forge and game options.

Who would lose? No one.

  • 10.20.2009 2:02 PM PDT