- jordanJ
- |
- Noble Heroic Member
- gamertag: Raawry
- user homepage:
Contribute to 10,000,000,000 covie kills!
Posted by: TS AGRawr2
Posted by: jordanJ
Posted by: Geoxbreather
Yeah, but Halo CE wasn't all awesome because of it's weapons.
It was because it had awesome foe's (elites) and the AI was stunning for it's time.
THAT';s why its awesome :P
Plus every weapons was useful.
If people don't buy it because it doesn;t include a BR. Then great! I don't really wanna play with people who judge their purchases based on what weapons are in the game, rather than the gameplay itself.
Uhm, there have been alot of BR haters saying if its in the game, they will not buy it. No matter what, you will be playing with a group whos decision was made becuase of one gun.
And chances are they will have BRs, cause if you read the books, they handed out prototypes around that time for field testing. Its kinda funny how people claim that there will be no BR cause they arent out, yet there is proof they were around then, just not mass produced.
Also, they would call Halo: Reach Halo 4 cause they only had to do multiplayer beta testing with 4 Halo games, so this would be the 4th of these ones.
But there will be a Halo 4, its already confirmed, Bungie isnt making it. 343 Industries is.
So much is wrong there.
First off: BR prototypes were on Reach, but wern't seen in the Battle of Reach. Only during First Strike did they appear.
I know people wont buy it if there are no BR's. I'm glad. I don't want to play with people like that.
No, Reach is Halo: Reach. It's not the 4th Halo game, it's the 6th (If you include ODST) It's its own game however. Not the 6th in the series.
Halo 4 has not been confirmed. 343 will be in charge of Halo. If they make a Halo 4, Halo: CE - 3 will be completely ruined story wise.