- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: EpicIn10sity
Posted by: ssSiege
1.Imo, Reach should not have any more larger maps than Halo 3 does. In fact, I believe that it should have less Large maps (such as Valhalla, sandtrap, etc..) and should stick to creating only a couple maps that are as large. Yes, a Spartan would most likely NOT fight in close quarters, arena style areas. However, the multiplayer (PvP) experience ISN'T the Campaign. The Campaign is for the whole "Novel-like, large area, gameplay"
2. Multiplayer can be used in several ways. Just to screw around, have fun with friends, or be competitive. Therefore, the only way that i would like to see this happen is if it was able to be Enable/Disabled. However, that is very unlikely because that would require a ton of work that is caompletely unnecessary. which leads to...
3. What you are suggesting is NOT what the Halo series was meant to be. Halo DOES NOT need to change. Halo 3 is still one of the most purchased games till today. (Wait? Halo 3 came out in 2007?) That's an EXREMELY long life-span for any game and especially because it is one of the most played series' in video games (Next to CoD, GoW, etc,,,) If this is implemented i would bet my life that it would not increase gameplay by any marginal amount.
People will still buy Halo no matter what they do to it and People will love it. This is just extra work for them to do which is unneccessary and time consuming.
~ssSiege
1. Halo definately needs larger maps.
2. This would make Halo more fun and could still be just to screw around if you want. It wouldn't change that aspect at all.
3. No matter what you want, HALO WILL CHANGE. There's nothing you can do to to stop it. The change will come.
1. I really liike bigger maps
2. Yeah, i wouldn't want this to ruin just screwing around
3. Halo prob will change in Reach just cuz its bungies last game