Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [14 votes]: Should there be more Hand-to-Hand combat in REACH?
  • Poll [14 votes]: Should there be more Hand-to-Hand combat in REACH?
Subject: Should there be more Hand-to-Hand combat in REACH?
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Defender of Reach

Poll: Should there be more Hand-to-Hand combat in REACH?  [closed]
Yes :  36%
(5 Votes)
No:  50%
(7 Votes)
Maybe So:  14%
(2 Votes)
Total Votes: 14

vote and discuss

  • 11.02.2009 11:48 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Defender of Reach

**********************THE QUESTION SHOULD BE "SHOULD THERE BE HAND TO HAND COMBAT IN REACH?" SORRY******************************************************** ************************************************

  • 11.02.2009 11:49 AM PDT

Second acct: RC Zerg Rushes

No. It's a first person shooter, not a first person fighter. Halo 3 already had too much of a dependance upon melees in combat.

  • 11.02.2009 11:52 AM PDT

mabey in place of double beatdowns (gahhhh) they could havve a sort of quicktime event. i mean, your a spartan trained in like every martial art, a little more action would be nice.

and i dont mean simply press what happens on the screen, you could have just b to hit, a to dodge, x to grab and have it overwith quickly, so i can get back to killing things

  • 11.02.2009 11:52 AM PDT

what do you, the enemy would be shooting plasma at you. probably not.

it would be awsome if there was! : )

  • 11.02.2009 11:53 AM PDT

Its halo, not street fighter. I rather them keep the current system then add this in.

  • 11.02.2009 11:54 AM PDT