Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [5 votes]: Dedicated Servers For Reach
  • Poll [5 votes]: Dedicated Servers For Reach
Subject: Dedicated Servers For Reach

Were it so easy.

Poll: Dedicated Servers For Reach  [closed]
Yes:  60%
(3 Votes)
No:  40%
(2 Votes)
Total Votes: 5

Currently Halo 3's multiplayer uses the host system. This system makes 1 player in a game the host which gives him host advantage which basically makes him harder to die and some other things.


This has annoyed players for a long time and dedicated servers would make there be no host and make all players equal.

So do you guys want dedicated servers for Reach's multiplayer?

  • 11.04.2009 8:14 PM PDT

Halo 3: ODST = $30

If it's possible I don't see why not. I would also like to be no lag-outs during a game but we'll have to see.

  • 11.04.2009 8:16 PM PDT

We do, but it's not happening.

  • 11.04.2009 8:16 PM PDT

PEANUT-BUTTER SLAP!

You'd get those same advantages if you're closer to the server. Besides, they come with their own set of problems.

[Edited on 11.04.2009 8:18 PM PST]

  • 11.04.2009 8:17 PM PDT

Posted by: Ushan
Because Muslims surgically implant organic bombs in their testicles, which in turn will be injected into women during sex, which will grow into BABY BOMBS!

Posted by: reptile1892
You'd get those same advantages if you're closer to the server. Besides, they come with their own set of problems.

  • 11.04.2009 8:20 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Intrepid Mythic Member
  • gamertag: bob570
  • user homepage:

R.I.P. Halo 2
11/9/04 - 4/15/10

- B( )B

No. If they have dedicated servers then MS can shut down Reach whenever they want, and since this is going to be the last Halo game, I want to be able to play it for a long time.

  • 11.04.2009 8:23 PM PDT