Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: leaked picture fake
  • Subject: leaked picture fake
Subject: leaked picture fake
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

I'm really hoping that most of you are not retarded. Does anyone even know what pre-alpha means?!?!?!

"STOP WHINING!"





obviously it isn't ready to be shown to the public.


[Edited on 11.08.2009 10:40 AM PST]

  • 11.08.2009 10:37 AM PDT

52,000 kills in Halo 2 and more legendary playthroughs in CE than you can imagine. I am truly a God.
.................................,-;;-=-,_____
,-------------------------.___/-----i````````'\--`\ .
|-------------xvxvxvxvxvxv--o-~~~~~~o--,\======
|_______|_o_./``/--/`;````~----------------~`
....................../_/`` BR-55

Posted by: the AR is a joke
Posted by: Phoenix9508
My friend, you are mistaken. Halo Reach is still within its Alpha Build. Also, it's been confirmed by certain memebers here that some Microsoft employees are quite dissatisfied by what has happened.

Also, don't think of it as perks, Tom even said that. Think of it like equipment used on yourself that's rechargeable.


No think of it as bungie noobing the game up even more.


Hey I've got an idea! Go play some MLG you -blam!-. You have no appreciation for anything but MLG so who cares what you think of Reach? Every thing must be "n00b" if its not around the BR and 125 movement speed.

[Edited on 11.08.2009 10:41 AM PST]

  • 11.08.2009 10:40 AM PDT

There's been a leaked picture?

/clueless

  • 11.08.2009 10:45 AM PDT

They look pretty legit to me, plus they just had the huge take home test at bungie, so someone's kid etc. could of easily snapped a few cell phone pics.

  • 11.08.2009 10:58 AM PDT

Were it so easy.

They are real. So much to support that. Leave it at that.

  • 11.08.2009 11:00 AM PDT

Signatures are for squares.

Jesus. Where the hell are the ninjas.

  • 11.08.2009 11:07 AM PDT

I like Halo.

  • 11.08.2009 11:23 AM PDT

Posted by: Two Bad Wines
I think the pictures are fake because according to halopedia, "While only a year away from release, Reach's environment architecture, cinematic script, and most in-game encounters have been either completely finished or polished [7]; in addition, many properties of Reach have been placed in the game and are currently playable". These pictures do not look finished or polished so they are either fake or taken from a really old build
http://halo.wikia.com/wiki/Halo_Reach


Also, it says this on the bungie weekly update 10/23/09,
"Most environments are architecting complete, some have seen substantial finishing
Many encounters have received substantial polish
Cinematic script has been recorded
Performances are up and running in-game"


http://www.bungie.net/News/content.aspx?type=topnews&link =BWU_102309





Hmmm..
That's right that was said on one of the the previous weekly updates.I think they're real but from a really old build.
Maybe what urk posted in the weekly update was to just to make fun of the old *ss pics tom morello leaked.They're real alright, just old.

  • 11.08.2009 11:35 AM PDT

People also seem to forget that "new engine" does not equal "better graphics"

You see, an engine is just that: an engine to make the game run. There are graphics engines, "regular" engines, physics engines, etc etc. For all we know they might be using the same graphics engine but a entirely new main engine that allows for, lets say: bigger environments, more enemies on screen, new multiplayer systems, new co-op systems, better loading times etc.

Them allegedly having said to be using a new engine might be completely misunderstood by 99.99999999% of us.

  • 11.08.2009 11:39 AM PDT

Posted by: DonVinzone1
People also seem to forget that "new engine" does not equal "better graphics"

You see, an engine is just that: an engine to make the game run. There are graphics engines, "regular" engines, physics engines, etc etc. For all we know they might be using the same graphics engine but a entirely new main engine that allows for, lets say: bigger environments, more enemies on screen, new multiplayer systems, new co-op systems, better loading times etc.

Them allegedly having said to be using a new engine might be completely misunderstood by 99.99999999% of us.



True.

  • 11.08.2009 12:20 PM PDT

Perception is everything.

I'd like to point something out. Look at the pic with the needler. Now look at the pic with the assault rifle and the start menu up. It appears they are in the exact same location, with the same health, and the banshee flying overhead in the same spot.


[Edited on 11.08.2009 12:50 PM PST]

  • 11.08.2009 12:41 PM PDT

Were it so easy.

Posted by: SlayersBane
I'd like to point something out. Look at the pic with the needler. Now look at the pic with the assault rifle and the start menu up. It appears they are in the exact same location, with the same health, and the banshee flying overhead in the same spot.

I thought that at first too, but no, that is not true, the picture with the AR is closer to the structures than the Needler and the Banshee is flying in a different direction.

[Edited on 11.08.2009 12:45 PM PST]

  • 11.08.2009 12:45 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Never give up on your dreams... unless you wanna be an astronaut.

-Krispy Kreme

Fake or not, I think they look pretty bad ass.

  • 11.08.2009 12:45 PM PDT

Perception is everything.

Posted by: LinkLegend0
Posted by: SlayersBane
I'd like to point something out. Look at the pic with the needler. Now look at the pic with the assault rifle and the start menu up. It appears they are in the exact same location, with the same health, and the banshee flying overhead in the same spot.

I thought that at first too, but no, that is not true, the picture with the AR is closer to the structures than the Needler and the Banshee is flying in a different direction.
Hmmm...good eye.

  • 11.08.2009 12:47 PM PDT

I'm the cult of personality,
I call it like i see it, if i feel the need to be blunt and to the point, then i will, if i feel the need to be very detailed, i will, im here to stay and im here to do things my way, if you respect that or not is your choice, not mine,
and don't worry, while i don't agree with everyone's opinion, i do respect everyone's opinion.

Posted by: SlayersBane
Posted by: LinkLegend0
Posted by: SlayersBane
I'd like to point something out. Look at the pic with the needler. Now look at the pic with the assault rifle and the start menu up. It appears they are in the exact same location, with the same health, and the banshee flying overhead in the same spot.

I thought that at first too, but no, that is not true, the picture with the AR is closer to the structures than the Needler and the Banshee is flying in a different direction.
Hmmm...good eye.

  • 11.08.2009 12:50 PM PDT

Posted by: Relapse v2
idk i just cant see me buying the next halo game that looks like that,and we probly wont get band as long as were not giving out links, but ign has even stated that the leaked pics were fake and stated that it "looks like someone has to much time on there hands"


I don't understand people... you know you sound spoiled I'm only 18 and I'd choose longer gameplay and a better story than graphics and I still do, I play a lot of old games and I get disappointed a lot in new games because there so heavy on graphic's but they suck at good gameplay or a story.

EDIT: oh and yea the games in the alpha build I hear so you're not looking at the finished product.

[Edited on 11.08.2009 12:56 PM PST]

  • 11.08.2009 12:56 PM PDT

Too often, people post on forums and just regurgitate what they've seen already and don't really explain their own views. - achronos

No way those could be fakes, I've tried enhancing the images on photo shop and they look legit and as far as the graphics, the graphics look about as good as the halo 3 beta(better graphics than ODST) and those are just off screen stills from a digital camera and they were shaky. If these were faked than the guy who faked them is a god.

  • 11.08.2009 12:56 PM PDT

It is my latest cultural research project! By randomly saying LOLWIN to semi-funny replies on the Halo 3 forum, I hypothesize that a temperary self-esteem boost will be present.

And once they read this, they will be a little worse off than before.

Posted by: WarmPanic

Well, not if they are Fake, but the graphics were extremely disappointed me


I don't think you could a get a good idea of the graphics from the photos, they were blurry.

Anyway, I'm not really sure if we are allowed to discuss this on the public forums, so I'll avoid going in depth.

I think it will have significantly better graphics though.

Posted by: privet caboose
Jesus. Where the hell are the ninjas.


Just as aware of the topic as us :P. Check the first page.

[Edited on 11.08.2009 1:29 PM PST]

  • 11.08.2009 1:02 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Well you see is blurry and badly, but enough to notice something.

and from what I saw the graphics are a disappointment to me.

But if it is an alpha version, do not change much?

I mean it improves ..

  • 11.08.2009 1:31 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Elite assassin 1
Posted by: the AR is a joke
Posted by: Phoenix9508
My friend, you are mistaken. Halo Reach is still within its Alpha Build. Also, it's been confirmed by certain memebers here that some Microsoft employees are quite dissatisfied by what has happened.

Also, don't think of it as perks, Tom even said that. Think of it like equipment used on yourself that's rechargeable.


No think of it as bungie noobing the game up even more.


Hey I've got an idea! Go play some MLG you -blam!-. You have no appreciation for anything but MLG so who cares what you think of Reach? Every thing must be "n00b" if its not around the BR and 125 movement speed.


I have no idea why people make this correlation. Just because I realise that bungie is mutilating their game in order appeal to more casual gamers does not mean I like MLG in any way.

  • 11.08.2009 1:35 PM PDT

"It sucking -blam!-s, it -blam!- sucks, it -blam!- blows, it's a piece of -blam!-... and I don't like it."
-AVGN
My reaction to most things on the internet (points for guessing the reference)
Best.Post.Ever.
Epic Bread

The person playing noted that the build was recent. My thoughts on the situation are that the build at microsoft was put together to test some sort of online functionality, possibly co-op. This could explain the lack of detail in the environments - the testing may be done in a more simple environment where data collection is more straightforward. The other possibility is that the build is just straight up old, with the misconception of it being newer possible because of the date the person played it.

The current build has to be a lot farther along than what is seen in these images. By now Bungie probably has a more complete UI where mission objectives are actually visible from the menus, and the font/HUD color as well as the HUD itself is improved. Also, the person who leaked the images noted that the characters didn't have voices - another indication of quite an early build when compared to recent news on the completion of Reach from a recent weekly update.

  • 11.08.2009 1:45 PM PDT

those are deff. alpha graphics...

  • 11.08.2009 1:48 PM PDT