Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [50 votes]: Please implement a new veto system for Reach!
  • Poll [50 votes]: Please implement a new veto system for Reach!
Subject: Please implement a new veto system for Reach!

B.U.N.G.L.E. Pro™

ಠ_ಠ

(●̮̮̃•̃)
./█\
..| |

Poll: Please implement a new veto system for Reach!  [closed]
Yes, fix the veto system!:  86%
(43 Votes)
No, keep it how it is!:  14%
(7 Votes)
Total Votes: 50

The current veto system is obnoxious. It's annoying to veto something you hate for something you hate even more. Make it so that you can see what you are getting if you veto. That way you could decide what you would prefer.

  • 11.09.2009 8:40 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

EXACTLY

  • 11.09.2009 8:41 PM PDT

that could be a good idea...i'm not sure how easy it is to implement into the game, but we'll see

  • 11.09.2009 8:42 PM PDT

you should be able to veto maps and gametypes separately.

EG.

press x to veto gametype

press y to veto map

  • 11.09.2009 8:43 PM PDT

B.U.N.G.L.E. Pro™

ಠ_ಠ

(●̮̮̃•̃)
./█\
..| |

Posted by: SHOTTY SNIP3R
you should be able to veto maps and gametypes separately.

That could work. Maybe someone doesn't like Slayer on Epitaph and would rather play Juggernaut or Swords on it.

  • 11.10.2009 1:54 PM PDT

reconz unite

and if you hate them both you can just keep vetoing endlessly

  • 11.10.2009 1:58 PM PDT

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the clichéd lines.

Posted by: THUNDERPENGUIN6
and if you hate them both you can just keep vetoing endlessly

No. Then the people that actually like the map/gametype will never get to play them in matchmaking because it will always be vetoes.

  • 11.10.2009 2:00 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: The Desert Wolf
im one second from taking this to the next level.

We should utilize Gears 2's system. No harm in copying something if it improves what we have in every way. LB and RB to choose between displayed gametypes, LT and RT to choose between displayed maps. Simple as that.

  • 11.10.2009 2:01 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Senior Legendary Member

Posted by: BTE
Posted by: Xharpan
it doese'nt look nextgen , looks good but not nextgen
If by next-gen you mean crappy, dark and colorless, I agree. It doesnt look next-gen at all.

The veto system is there to teach players that you don't know how good something is till you lose it.

  • 11.10.2009 2:13 PM PDT

B.U.N.G.L.E. Pro™

ಠ_ಠ

(●̮̮̃•̃)
./█\
..| |

Posted by: BTE
The veto system is there to teach players that you don't know how good something is till you lose it.

I hate that part of it :P

Whenever people start vetoing CTF, I'm always worried that it will be something worse like Team King.

  • 11.10.2009 9:31 PM PDT

I IS BOB

Like a dick in a box?

  • 11.10.2009 9:37 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

The Last Fighter

That is a great idea! Also the idea for voting X for changing the map and Y for changing the gametype is also brilliant!

  • 11.10.2009 9:38 PM PDT

Damn you 353 guilty spark! You killed the greatest stereotypical african american gun toting sergeant ever to tread upon a fictional futuristic setting!

I love this idea. Too often then not when a veto is won, the map and gametype obtained is something you have been playing all day. I swear, 90 percent of the time I end up either on valhalla, sandbox, or sandtrap playing either assault or slayer. They have so many maps, and so many gametypes but you never get to see any of them.

  • 11.10.2009 10:24 PM PDT

there should be no veto system bungie shall choose for us and when there not their to choose we sit and wait and when they return we play and play. An ten years later where still playing then we relise that is this what i spent doing my whole... LIFE WELL SPENT

  • 11.10.2009 10:54 PM PDT

Excellent idea! I hate vetoing Slayer on Snowbound only to get BRs on Foundry. Ugh!

  • 11.11.2009 12:34 AM PDT

B.U.N.G.L.E. Pro™

ಠ_ಠ

(●̮̮̃•̃)
./█\
..| |

Posted by: LightningBurn
Another improvment would be to allow us to veto the map before loading it. Making us load it first just wastes time, they should lets us veto as soon as its chosen the game n' map and let it load while we do. If we decide to play on that game n' map it should contiue loading the game n' map and it we decide we want a new map, it should curtail the loading and begin loading a new map.

I didn't really think of that at first, but now that you mention it, it is a bit obnoxious. Especially when someone is playing a map for the first time, it takes forever to load.

  • 11.11.2009 8:59 AM PDT