- Evil Johnny
- |
- Exalted Heroic Member
I could care less about graphics, why do you think people still come back to Halo CE? Not because it has better graphics than Halo 3. We don't want a braindead eyecandy, the gameplay before th visuals, otherwise it would suck, and you can't say make em both as important, there are always priorities, and hopefully those aren't the graphics. And hell, we aren't in the days of the 64 where everything is polygons, the better the technology, the better the games age well. Halo CE is a proof that it aged well, it isn't bothersome to watch. Though I admit the gameplay was weaker as the storyline and level design. Hell, I can understand you didn't play as the Arbiter again, but what I don't understand, is such an important character, one you played half the game with in the previous Halo, had to be some braindead sidekick who wasn't more present than in a single short cinematic. That was awful. Everything was too fast and felt rushed, the missions didn't seem to have been constructed according to the environment.
I agree, if Halo: Reach is less good than ODST, high chances are I'm not going to buy the new IP.
And if you believe the graphics of the leaked images are representative of the final graphics, you're dumb. I mean, technically, they can't be worse as well as can't be as good, so you get the obvious I hope. And as if wasn't obvious enough either that there were a LOT of placeholders.
[Edited on 11.12.2009 8:22 AM PST]