Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [12 votes]: REACH needs new EXP ranking system
  • Poll [12 votes]: REACH needs new EXP ranking system
Subject: REACH needs new EXP ranking system
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Defender of Reach

Poll: REACH needs new EXP ranking system  [closed]
Yes:  58%
(7 Votes)
No :  17%
(2 Votes)
Maybe:  17%
(2 Votes)
FTW!:  8%
(1 Votes)
Total Votes: 12

Halo really needs a new ranking system. I'm so tired of playing long games just to lose 50-49 and not get any EXP or winning an getting only 1 EXP. It should be a win/win like CoD where you get it on your performance instead of win/lose. And ik ppl are gunna be like (Probably in 5 yr old squeaker voice) "omfg thats so stupid. its HALO not c*ck a doody 4. we dont want a cod feeling." (STFU whoever is going to say that)
Discuss and Vote
(Oh and they should bring back were you only have your rank and not stupid -blam!-ing ranks for each individual game type

  • 11.12.2009 11:41 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Defender of Reach

PLEASE DISCUSS!

  • 11.12.2009 11:43 AM PDT

I don't it should be just like CoD, but i think it should be a little better. Even if the change is getting 1 xp for losing and 2 for wining i would be satisfied. And if losses dont affect your rank it be helpful as well. It wouldn't make it easy to get a 50, but it would help people that are afraid to play because of the fear of losing a hard earned 49 because they are so close.

  • 11.12.2009 11:45 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Defender of Reach

yeah that sounds good. i just want something better than 1 exp for winning and none for losing

  • 11.12.2009 11:50 AM PDT

Halo 2 ranking system was fine.

However Microsoft has control over Bungie so they'll probably be forced to use trueskill.

  • 11.12.2009 11:53 AM PDT

BoxOfBlades

bungie.net needs bigger search bar

  • 11.12.2009 12:31 PM PDT
  • gamertag: SSLYK
  • user homepage:

~SSLYK~

this has been discussed already on the forums, ana im really hoping reach has a more of a COD ranking system, not exactly the same but similar.

  • 11.12.2009 12:32 PM PDT

The reason I don't play Halo much anymore is because you only get something if you win, and most players are bad and I always get people on my team that go -10 or more.

The reason I play MW2 a lot, and will continue to for a long time, is that it doesn't matter if you win or lose, as long as you do good yourself then you are rewarded.

  • 11.12.2009 12:33 PM PDT
  • gamertag: BJRSCJ
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Killa3194
And if losses dont affect your rank it be helpful as well. It wouldn't make it easy to get a 50, but it would help people that are afraid to play because of the fear of losing a hard earned 49 because they are so close.
Your rank isn't affected by losing...? What is our world coming to, giving smiley faces instead of grades and all that feel good crap. They already incorporated high skill into the game. Nobody knows what rank you are except the people you play against, because only your high skill shows.

We need a ranking system that 1) discourages deranking/multiaccounting 2) creates a LARGE skill gap as proposed to your small skill gap (a large skill gap may hurt some mommy's boy egos, but it creates fair matching) and 3) encourages and rewards commitment for the long haul

  • 11.12.2009 12:34 PM PDT

Tank beats everything!!!

I dont like the cod idea of xp but i do like the idea of new xp system it takes forever to level up if you cant be arsed to be really competetive in ranked

  • 11.12.2009 1:18 PM PDT

i would prefer a COD stylesystem, the whole 1 EXP PER GAME NO MATTER WHAT thing is -blam!-. Whats the point, we might as well just have a game countert than xp.

[Edited on 11.12.2009 1:49 PM PST]

  • 11.12.2009 1:49 PM PDT