Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Please keep Halo Reach like a Halo game
  • Subject: Please keep Halo Reach like a Halo game
Subject: Please keep Halo Reach like a Halo game

I don't see why so many people want other games aspects added into reach, like perks from COD, blind fire and tactical rolls from gears, and i even saw a post wanting air strikes and recon like in COD. why don't people wanna keep halo like halo

  • 11.13.2009 12:19 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

because then it would be just another rehash like halo 2 and 3. At least people are thinking progressively here.

  • 11.13.2009 12:21 PM PDT

i just looked at one of your other posts and i'm all for new maps and stuff i just don't wanna blend the line between halo and other games, i just think perks and unlockable weapons and all the tactical stuff would take away from the "halo" feel. it would just take away from the unique halo gameplay.

  • 11.13.2009 12:24 PM PDT

Posted by: SCISSOEMETIMBERS
because then it would be just another rehash like halo 2 and 3. At least people are thinking progressively here.


Yes, It's got to be different, but that doesn't mean everyone has to steal ideas from other games like the Kill Streaks, Perks ect.

  • 11.13.2009 12:24 PM PDT

Posted by: Ultramarine 360

Yes, It's got to be different, but that doesn't mean everyone has to steal ideas from other games like the Kill Streaks, Perks ect.


exactly, it can be new and different but it doesn't need to take things from other games because a lot of people who play halo don't wan those things.

  • 11.13.2009 12:36 PM PDT

Dyor' Docuree (2nd in command of the powerhouse, The Sangheili Army)

Posted by: AtA xXShantzyXx
Posted by: Ultramarine 360

Yes, It's got to be different, but that doesn't mean everyone has to steal ideas from other games like the Kill Streaks, Perks ect.


exactly, it can be new and different but it doesn't need to take things from other games because a lot of people who play halo don't wan those things.


well put, I believe that there should be new multiplayer levels (no more re-do's), but keep that gameplay that made Halo . . . Halo. It's an awesome series and using other games add-ins would take away from what people have come to love from halo. Bungie should definitely add new things to the game, but keep it as original as possible, though there most likely will be a few things from CoD and Gears.

You can think progressive and keep Halo original, you don't necessarily have to take things from other games to make yours better and that's what a lot of posters who want some CoD and Gears things are over looking, and besides, if you want things from CoD and Gears added in, Go Buy CoD and Gears!

  • 11.13.2009 12:48 PM PDT

Marine Corps.
Semper Fi.

Posted by: Wikked Navajoe
My problems [with Reach] are basically just full parties, mlg, and people who go out of their way not to get killed.

I don't see anything wrong with bombing runs from shortswords in the campaign and hopefully a Firefight-like mode. In multiplayer it doesn't really belong... not with Halo at least.

Well, it kind of does. It would work and everything and I am sure people would love it. It would certainly change the pace of matchmaking, that's for sure.

  • 11.13.2009 12:51 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Halo does not need anything from other games, Halo is Halo, and if they do not like it, do not play better idiots play these little games like gow


Peolpe sux

  • 11.13.2009 12:59 PM PDT

Although I've came with multiple threads about how the game could be, I still think Halo has to be Halo!

I've played it since halo CE and it's my most favorite game franchise. I love it the way it is!
But there are things that could be tweaked/added and stuff.

  • 11.13.2009 1:03 PM PDT

yeah like people all over this forum are saying things from COD and gears would make it better but honestly it would seem out of place in halo and it just wouldn't be the same.

  • 11.13.2009 1:05 PM PDT

I don't want to drastic a change, just add some cool new stuff.

  • 11.13.2009 1:07 PM PDT

Posted by: Duardo
I'd love to be a 10 year old and tell my mom I'm going on an adventure out into the world catching Pokemon, with her full support. Never mind the fact that there are rapists, criminals, and murders out there, or the fact that I may get killed by a Pokemon.

Luckily I have Pikachu.

This happens with every major new release.

When Mass Effect 2 is released everyone will want Reach to be an RPG.
When bioshock 2 is released everyone will want plasmids.
When Splinter Cell: Conviction is out everyone will want stealth based gameplay.

It's an endless cycle.

  • 11.13.2009 1:14 PM PDT

Posted by: AtA xXShantzyXx
I don't see why so many people want other games aspects added into reach, like perks from COD, blind fire and tactical rolls from gears, and i even saw a post wanting air strikes and recon like in COD. why don't people wanna keep halo like halo
Well, I just think that the Halo formula is getting a bit old. The refining process was good with Halo 2 and Halo 3, but I'd rather want some really new gameplay then a refined version of Halo 3.

  • 11.13.2009 1:16 PM PDT

i own COD and Gears and i like them both as games but when i play halo i play it as a game that is different from both of those games and has none of the things in those games that piss me off and i'm not trying to have the things in those games that separates them from halo, plus i've been happy with every halo there has been from Halo CE all the way up to ODST, so honestly the refining method is fine with me.

  • 11.13.2009 1:20 PM PDT

Aye.

Posted by: SCISSOEMETIMBERS
because then it would be just another rehash like halo 2 and 3. At least people are thinking progressively here.


Thinking progressively implies that there are half-intelligent thoughts emanating from said thinking.

  • 11.13.2009 1:52 PM PDT