Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Reach, as for being like MW or GOW (not another "put this in&q...
  • Subject: Reach, as for being like MW or GOW (not another "put this in&q...
Subject: Reach, as for being like MW or GOW (not another "put this in&q...

ityler

It seems ridiculous to me that everyone is arguing about how halo should, or should not be like other games. I see people complaining about how too many people want perks and what not. I realize that there are also many speculations everywhere about this game. Nobody knows what it's ACTUALLY based on or how it will pan out, so you can't say what it should be like. You can only say what you think it should be like, or how you want it to be. Which is an opinion that should not be shot down.

Be more like MW or GOW-Changing the graphics from halo to these games would be straight up retarded. That being said, I understand what people have been trying to say. They don't mean change the game into MW or GOW, they are saying change something into SOMETHING.

Multiplayer-I think halo is fine with its xbox live capabilities, but i think maybe the experience points can maybe improve by shaping somewhat into the MW exp.

Perks-I agree with you complainers, there should be no perks.

Kill Streaks-There have always been kill streaks in halo.

GOW rolls-No.

Unlockable weapons-That would surely take out halo's individualism. A sort of ridiculous thought.

"FANBOY" talk-You people are really ignorant, calling other people fanboys. Is that like the almighty diss? If you ever use the word "fanboy" to put somebody down...you should feel like the biggest nerd on this site.

**GRAPHICS**

Everyone keeps taking words from one post a while ago...and completely transforming them. The graphics, i agree, help make halo more indepenent. BUT, with the assumption that Reach will be based on "The Fall of Reach" I think there should be more...actiony action. A more serious feel. The player not feeling as if they are completely invincible, on top of the world. Of course, this IS reach, it may or may not have the big fights everyone is hoping for. But hopefully, the intensity is brought up.

Conclusion-I don't think the graphics should change, just enhance to the scenario.

[EDIT] THERE SHOULD BE NO BLINDFIRING. thats dumb as hell.

[Edited on 11.13.2009 1:50 PM PST]

  • 11.13.2009 1:29 PM PDT

I once heard an old man say " Years ago, i sold my trumpet for something to eat, and know i know it would be better to die of hunger."

I upload a ton of Halo clips on my YouTube channel, feel free to subscribe.

BRILLIANT!
but I think Bungie is still going to improve the graphics

  • 11.13.2009 1:32 PM PDT

yah, deff no perks cuz 1 of the reasons i enjoy halo is becuz every encounter with someone is typically the same, if there was perks that would change,. its the same reason why i like 100% of helath be able to recharge.

  • 11.13.2009 1:33 PM PDT

You're the first one to post such a story not.

  • 11.13.2009 1:34 PM PDT

ityler


oh yah of course, graphics can always be improved. just not ultra modified
Posted by: Nova Jake
BRILLIANT!
but I think Bungie is still going to improve the graphics

  • 11.13.2009 1:34 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

.

[Edited on 11.13.2009 1:38 PM PST]

  • 11.13.2009 1:37 PM PDT

ityler

Posted by: HI Goldex
You're the first one to post such a story not.
yah you're right, nobody has posted this kind of thread, they all have individual ideas. and shooting down others. This one includes most of them. AND this isnt a "keep halo, halo. and keep mw, mw. cuz that is all bs. they arent going to make halo into anything else. they can just tweak stuff.

  • 11.13.2009 1:38 PM PDT

As far as graphics go, isn't bungie making a new engine for Reach?

It called like AA or A+ somthing with an A I forgot.

  • 11.13.2009 1:40 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I think that reach should have that "lonely wanderer" feel like Halo: CE did.

  • 11.13.2009 1:41 PM PDT

ityler

Posted by: TroIl
I think that reach should have that "lonely wanderer" feel like Halo: CE did.


maybe in some parts. but not throughout the entire game. remember, reach is being invaded and destroyed. covenant kill fest.

  • 11.13.2009 1:45 PM PDT

Posted by: ZYPHER8 Iz BaK
Posted by: TroIl
I think that reach should have that "lonely wanderer" feel like Halo: CE did.


maybe in some parts. but not throughout the entire game. remember, reach is being invaded and destroyed. covenant kill fest.


No Russian, but your aliens!


That's a game i'd play.

  • 11.13.2009 1:46 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: ZYPHER8 Iz BaK
Posted by: TroIl
I think that reach should have that "lonely wanderer" feel like Halo: CE did.


maybe in some parts. but not throughout the entire game. remember, reach is being invaded and destroyed. covenant kill fest.
Yeah, that is okay. But it needs to be in there. ODST really didn't get that feeling right for me. So I'm hoping that reach will do some good work on presentation.

  • 11.13.2009 1:49 PM PDT

ityler

ODST was sort of a flop. bought mostly for the maps and reach beta

  • 11.13.2009 1:51 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Halo does not need anything from other games, if we remember HALO is HALO for the gameplay and story

HALO NOT NEED, PERKS, or cover or anything like that the gameplay is PERFECT!

All you need GRAPHICS ARE BETTER!

  • 11.13.2009 1:53 PM PDT

ityler

Posted by: WarmPanic

Halo does not need anything from other games, if we remember HALO is HALO for the gameplay and story

HALO NOT NEED, PERKS, or cover or anything like that the gameplay is PERFECT!

All you need GRAPHICS ARE BETTER!

well that was a nice summary of what i basically said. but dont say keep halo, halo.

halo will always be halo.

so people, quit begging for them to keep it the same

  • 11.13.2009 1:55 PM PDT

Greg Giraldo, George Carlin, Bill Hicks. R.I.P.
T.M.Revolution = 音楽の神

I don't understand why people want Halo's graphics to look like these other games? I think maybe they should just have Halo Reach's graphics look like, I don't know like... Halo?

[Edited on 11.13.2009 2:03 PM PST]

  • 11.13.2009 2:02 PM PDT

ityler

Posted by: Spec OpsLeader1
I don't understand why people want Halo's graphics to look like these other games? I think maybe they should just have Halo Reach's graphics look like, I don't know like... Halo?

you completely missed what i was saying. people dont want the graphics to be like other games. they just want them to be better.
and basically, i dont care about a graphic change. i want a scenery change, so it looks like war

  • 11.13.2009 2:10 PM PDT

Aye.

I like Halo's graphical style. I dig whole "new palette per level" thing that Bungie do. I think a more ODST-ish serious tone needs to be applied to scenery - not to say that there shouldn't be the "ooh ahhhh" vistas of H3...

As far as I'm concerned, all they really need is to ratchet up the textures and AA a bit.

[Edited on 11.13.2009 2:13 PM PST]

  • 11.13.2009 2:13 PM PDT

Greg Giraldo, George Carlin, Bill Hicks. R.I.P.
T.M.Revolution = 音楽の神

Posted by: ZYPHER8 Iz BaK
Posted by: Spec OpsLeader1
I don't understand why people want Halo's graphics to look like these other games? I think maybe they should just have Halo Reach's graphics look like, I don't know like... Halo?

you completely missed what i was saying. people dont want the graphics to be like other games. they just want them to be better.
and basically, i dont care about a graphic change. i want a scenery change, so it looks like war

Scenery change involves graphics.

"Be more like MW or GOW-Changing the graphics from halo to these games would be straight up retarded. That being said, I understand what people have been trying to say. They don't mean change the game into MW or GOW, they are saying change something into SOMETHING."
There's what you said and now are contradicting yourself.

Scenery change involves graphics.

Anyway yeah I get what you're saying. I don't really care much, as long as the game is good of course.

[Edited on 11.13.2009 2:24 PM PST]

  • 11.13.2009 2:20 PM PDT

ityler

Posted by: Spec OpsLeader1
Posted by: ZYPHER8 Iz BaK
Posted by: Spec OpsLeader1
I don't understand why people want Halo's graphics to look like these other games? I think maybe they should just have Halo Reach's graphics look like, I don't know like... Halo?

you completely missed what i was saying. people dont want the graphics to be like other games. they just want them to be better.
and basically, i dont care about a graphic change. i want a scenery change, so it looks like war

Scenery change involves graphics.

"Be more like MW or GOW-Changing the graphics from halo to these games would be straight up retarded. That being said, I understand what people have been trying to say. They don't mean change the game into MW or GOW, they are saying change something into SOMETHING."
There's what you said and now are contradicting yourself.

Scenery change involves graphics.

Anyway yeah I get what you're saying. I don't really care much, as long as the game is good of course.

as long as the game is good i dont think anybody will really care. and i dont think i was contradicting myself. changing something into SOMETHING doesnt mean making the graphics more like other games. and yes scenery changes include graphical changes, but not to the point were the actual graphics of the game will noticably change.



[Edited on 11.14.2009 12:25 PM PST]

  • 11.13.2009 2:29 PM PDT

Greg Giraldo, George Carlin, Bill Hicks. R.I.P.
T.M.Revolution = 音楽の神

Remove what you just said starting from "to everyone". I'm not trying a be, or I don't like being a forum cop, I just don't want you to get perma banned. It's against the rules to talk about something which is supposvely "leaked" and that's the punishment.

[Edited on 11.13.2009 4:11 PM PST]

  • 11.13.2009 4:10 PM PDT

ityler

i deleted it. thanks

  • 11.14.2009 12:25 PM PDT