Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Halo Reach Halo 4
  • Subject: Halo Reach Halo 4
Subject: Halo Reach Halo 4

dsaxby

halo reach should be halo 4 because they cant leave 117 in space

  • 11.14.2009 9:27 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Halo Reach is 1 month before Halo 1

  • 11.14.2009 9:29 PM PDT

They can, and they will. Halo 3 was the end of that story arc.

If there is to be a Halo 4, I doubt Bungie will have anything to do with it.

  • 11.14.2009 9:29 PM PDT

PEANUT-BUTTER SLAP!

Well ... they did. Besides, this looks more interesting.

  • 11.14.2009 9:30 PM PDT

Posted by: bad boy24
halo reach should be halo 4 because they cant leave 117 in space


They can do whatever they want. Take a seat.

  • 11.14.2009 9:30 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?

Posted by: bad boy24
halo reach should be halo 4 because they cant leave 117 in space
technically it is "Halo 4" because it is the fourth game to be made in the original trilogy.

  • 11.14.2009 9:30 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Legendary Member

Check out my group if you love talking about music.
The Haven for Music
Another good groupNew Mombasa

I doubt we will sea a Halo 4 from any company until the launch of the next Xbox.

  • 11.14.2009 9:30 PM PDT

Send me $50 and I'll tell you how to get rich

Bungie said after they made Halo 1 that Halo would be a trilogy. Bungie would only make up to Halo 3 and then some side stories. 343 Industries might make a Halo 4 but not Bungie

  • 11.14.2009 9:32 PM PDT

Posted by: grey101
Posted by: bad boy24
halo reach should be halo 4 because they cant leave 117 in space
technically it is "Halo 4" because it is the fourth game to be made in the original trilogy.


Technically you are wrong. 4th game in the trilogy? Trilogy = 3 you idiot.

  • 11.14.2009 9:33 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?

Posted by: spreadin cheaks
Posted by: grey101
Posted by: bad boy24
halo reach should be halo 4 because they cant leave 117 in space
technically it is "Halo 4" because it is the fourth game to be made in the original trilogy.


Technically you are wrong. 4th game in the trilogy? Trilogy = 3 you idiot.


When the game is out then it will be expanded past trilogy, until then it is a trilogy since a fourth game hasn't been made.

you can spread your cheeks a little wider now.

  • 11.14.2009 9:35 PM PDT

Send me $50 and I'll tell you how to get rich

Posted by: spreadin cheaks
Posted by: grey101
Posted by: bad boy24
halo reach should be halo 4 because they cant leave 117 in space
technically it is "Halo 4" because it is the fourth game to be made in the original trilogy.


Technically you are wrong. 4th game in the trilogy? Trilogy = 3 you idiot.


I totally agree.

  • 11.14.2009 9:35 PM PDT

Posted by: grey101
Posted by: spreadin cheaks
Posted by: grey101
Posted by: bad boy24
halo reach should be halo 4 because they cant leave 117 in space
technically it is "Halo 4" because it is the fourth game to be made in the original trilogy.


Technically you are wrong. 4th game in the trilogy? Trilogy = 3 you idiot.


When the game is out then it will be expanded past trilogy, until then it is a trilogy since a fourth game hasn't been made.

you can spread your cheeks a little wider now.


You don't even make sense. The trilogy before the half divided by the quotient times the perimeter is the result of technically Halo 4. That's what you sound like.

  • 11.14.2009 9:38 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?

i didn't realize my post made a sound :)

  • 11.14.2009 9:39 PM PDT

Posted by: grey101
i didn't realize my post made a sound :)


Don't change the subject. You just made yourself look like an idiot. Trilogy does not mean 4 in anyway shape or form.

EDit: Who's cheeks got spread this time?

[Edited on 11.14.2009 9:45 PM PST]

  • 11.14.2009 9:42 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?

Posted by: spreadin cheaks
Posted by: grey101
i didn't realize my post made a sound :)


Don't change the subject. You just made yourself look like an idiot. Trilogy does not mean 4 in anyway shape or form.

EDit: Who's cheeks got spread this time?

not really, i'd feel like an idiot if i posted something stupid which i haven't done in 3 years or so. ha im just being friendly because you don't know who your dealing with, and Foman can tell you i have a nasty temper :) good day sir and don't strain yourself while spreading.

  • 11.14.2009 9:47 PM PDT

*shivers run down back* Oh my god, I didn't mean to insult you on the internets. Please forgive me mr. 'nasty temper'....lol wow you are stupid.

  • 11.14.2009 9:50 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

The best thing that could ever happen for Halo is to absolutely not milk the whole Master Chief thing for at least a couple of years, when the next gen consoles come out so everyone can be like "wow, I remember him!".

On another note I believe that 343 studios will do a good job making more Halo games, however I also feel that saturation is never good (just look at fats..), and sooner or later Halo will have the same problem Guitar Hero suffers nowadays - more of the same for my of my cash -

  • 11.14.2009 10:07 PM PDT

I ♥ Bungie!

He lands on onyx if you do the last lvl on legendary,then on the video youll see him drift toward a near by planet (onyx).

[Edited on 11.14.2009 10:11 PM PST]

  • 11.14.2009 10:09 PM PDT

I ♥ Bungie!

Posted by: Glogsplat
Bungie said after they made Halo 1 that Halo would be a trilogy. Bungie would only make up to Halo 3 and then some side stories. 343 Industries might make a Halo 4 but not Bungie
343 sucks.

  • 11.14.2009 10:12 PM PDT