Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Campaign or Multiplayer?
  • Subject: Campaign or Multiplayer?
Subject: Campaign or Multiplayer?
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Hello ..

would prefer, the campaign or multiplayer?
honestly I prefer by far the campaign.
The multiplayer I think it's the last thing we should be concerned.

I want a long campaign of 15 hours, with massive battles, 20 fighting wraiths 20 with tanks, marines against elites and ships exploding and falling out on the ground, covenant assault ships devastating Reach with his thunderbolt. something epic! with the wonderful soundtrack of halo

I prefer a 15-hour campaign with frantic action
a super multiplayer

opinions?

  • 11.22.2009 7:17 PM PDT

Both.

  • 11.22.2009 7:20 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Senior Mythic Member

Proud frenchie, elite fan, anthro artist not hellbent on yiff convention/pics/whatever, mature and intelligent forum guy, 4chaner, halo 2 lover and halo 3 hater.

Posted by: WarmPanic
The multiplayer I think it's the last thing we should be concerned.
opinions?


times I've played the halo 3 campaign : 3... maybe 4
times I've played halo 3 mutliplayer : over 9000 (unfortunately.)


basically, mp is A LOT LOT LOT more replayable than sp.

  • 11.22.2009 7:21 PM PDT

There is nothing wrong with Halo:Reach. We all just have our gripes about everything we don't like. Not liking something doesn't make it broken.

Posted by: z0rgy
Posted by: WarmPanic
The multiplayer I think it's the last thing we should be concerned.
opinions?


times I've played the halo 3 campaign : 3... maybe 4
times I've played halo 3 mutliplayer : over 9000 (unfortunately.)


basically, mp is A LOT LOT LOT more replayable than sp.


Thats because, technically, the same thing should never be able to happen twice.

The only constant in multiplayer is the way the game works.

However, I sympathize with OPs idea for a more EPIC, replayable campaign. It can't hurt.


I believe Bungie will deliver.

  • 11.22.2009 7:23 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

times I've played the halo 3 campaign : 3... maybe 4
times I've played halo 3 mutliplayer : over 9000 (unfortunately.)


basically, mp is A LOT LOT LOT more replayable than sp.

But I'm not saying that the multiplayer does not do well, I'm saying is that the campaign of Halo Reach should be incredible, full of action, whatever the book says.

What bothers me is that many users demand many the multiplayer, and if the multiplayer of Halo Reach out like Halo 3 would be great.

I've come.
I PREFER TO WORK MORE IN THE CAMPAIGN


[Edited on 11.22.2009 7:29 PM PST]

  • 11.22.2009 7:28 PM PDT

Software Tester at Code Refinery
North Carolina State University 2011

Both need and will be well done.

  • 11.22.2009 7:44 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

(-_-) Bored Face

I would prefer multiplayer focus because campaign is really for story line purposes, but multiplayer is for replayability which I want it to have alot more of.

  • 11.22.2009 7:46 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I've always been a PvEer and prefered campaign because I enjoy the storyline.

  • 11.22.2009 8:30 PM PDT

Wow, just wow!

I just hope the campaign is longer than ODST's and the multiplayer isnt just a Halo 3 multiplayer on a separate disc. I mean really, I do not need 3 Halo 3 multiplayers.

And I play the multiplayer more, but the campaign keeps me more engrossed.

  • 11.22.2009 8:34 PM PDT

I'm sure they'll have a nice long 10hour campaign and a kick ass multiplayer to go along with it. They're a big enought studio to divert seperate attention to each.

  • 11.22.2009 8:35 PM PDT