- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Hmmm...all I really got was, "WAHHHHHHHH I WAS NOT COMPLETELY SATISFIED SO I GOT RIPPED OFF!" from Camnator. I guess being disappointed these days means you can throw around words like "scam" and "rip-off" whenever you are displeased. Still trying to figure out how the developer, someone who makes a game, is to blame for the price even when the publisher, someone who sells, funds, and advertises said game, set it.
Some things I want to respond to though.
And one more thing, I enjoyed the ODST campaign, it was pretty cool, I can both enjoy a game and realize it was a rip off.
Fine.
Firefight was dreadful, not only did they lie to us about the skulls being random, the enemies are easily predictable, it lags like crazy, and after set 5 it never increases the difficulty, even the maps were just lazily slapped in directly from campaign.
OMG GUYZ, THE SKULLS IS NOT RANDOM LIKE THEY SAID, THEY BE LIARS!!!!!!! As for everything else, opinions and your own technical issues.
I bought the game new, most games take months to drop in price, ODST took less than a week, it was not expected, and also shows how the public felt about the price. No stores sold copies of just ODST, or I would have just gotten that, I argue all the time that there should have been bundle packs so everyone would be happy and the forums wouldn't be clogged with topics about being disappointed with the game/price.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Different bundles! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You'd think Microsoft would do that? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Because it had the word Halo on it, and compared to most Halo games it was a flop, you can tell this by the small number of players this game has, Halo 3 is almost 2.5 years old and still has ten times as many players.
I would expect the main game to have more players than the expansion. Yes, I call it an expansion, but it is an expansion taht is it's own game.
"The size of the game has nothing to do with it."
Is that a joke?
You're the one who keeps posting Gigabytes and thinking it makes you point so much more valid.
This game didn't even have a matchmaking, and the campaign was far shorter than any other Halo game, where in this do you see it should cost as much as a full game?
Campaign length varies from person to person.
That's good. I admit that what ODST came with is worth around $50, so if you didn't own Halo 3, or it broke, or didn't have any DLC, or whatever, it was a pretty good deal. It's just most of us already had Halo 3 since we're Halo fans, it's an insult that we had to re-purchase maps we already had. Which is why there should have been different bundles so everyone would be happy.
Problem is, different bundles would have not been very cost effective or even suggested. Besides, if you are going to include Halo 3 matchmaking, why not include the other maps? Good Lord, an extra $10, WAHHHHHHHH!
They expected that because Bungie later claimed it was, and all reviews of the game were biased and misleading.
[b]Yeah, damn those reviewers for genuinely liking a game and having different playing experiences than other gamers.