- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: MJOLNIRdragoon
Posted by: DarkHellfire
Posted by: Wicked Ninja
Posted by: MJOLNIRdragoon
no they mean as in the strenght and effectiveness, yes literally your correct , the rifle would replace the old rifle, but they dont mean like literally your way too angry... go out and punch a wall or something dude...
Thank YOU too! I can't stand when people open there mouths and flame others when they are the idiots for not fully understanding the post they flame. Also Darkhellfire, before you get into what weapons held with how many hands, use your common sense to determine: Assualt rifle and SMG, are both rapid fire, and the Pistol and Battle Rifle both have zoom, and you should go for the head, the only differenct being that the battle rifle is three shot burst when not zoomed in. So go play with your toys, and let the grown-ups have a conversation.
Adults?? More like an idiot who wouldnt know reason if it bit him on the ass. Okay, so, now your saying the BR is the new sidearm?? Since when was a Rifle a sidearm, tell me that?? Please?? I want to know how it magically became a sidearm.
Shall i say this where a 5 year old could understand???? They do not mean that the BR is literally the replacment for the Pistol. They do not mean that the SMG is the replacment for the AR. DO NOT TAKE THIS THREAD LITERALLY. your ignorance is frustrating me, quit with the being literal and technical.
It wouldnt make sense any other way. If they're going to totally shun the idea of the handgun just for a BR, that's a pretty stupid move.