Halo 3 Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: skill level to be considered good?
  • Subject: skill level to be considered good?
Subject: skill level to be considered good?

Join The Spartan I Project today!
SIP is here to help you achieve a 1,000 Gamer Score and Unlock all of the Armor Permutations.

I'm certainly not pro
Posted by: JamezIsABEAST

Posted by: Menacing Smiles_
My skill ranking system:
1-10 = Noob
11-20 = Semi-Noob
21-30 = intense Noob
31-40 = Average
41-49 = Pro
50 = MLG like Pro or just an experienced player

But never underestimate someone's skill, I've completely beat up 50s and got beat up by 15s before.


You consider someone with a 41 pro? .........Wow

  • 07.23.2010 11:13 AM PDT

I'm out.

50 to be considered good. 40 is about average.

  • 07.23.2010 11:16 AM PDT

1-20= noob
20-30=meh
30-35=not bad
35-40=good (me)
40-45=great
45-49=intimidating
50=Godly
everyone is using the word "good" a little too lightly

  • 07.23.2010 12:00 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Depends what playlist. I seen kids AR bash their way into the 40s and have no skill with a BR.

[Edited on 07.23.2010 12:12 PM PDT]

  • 07.23.2010 12:11 PM PDT

Posted by: HL Doubles
ranks dont tell anything ive been kicked in the face by a field major before ........he was reeeelllyyy gooood


Very true...ive seen all different ranks do incredibly awsome and some do incredibly awful...everyone has good playing day's and bad playing day's.

  • 07.23.2010 12:25 PM PDT

Eat my blue balls.

At this point, if you don't have at least one 50, you're terrible. Most people with just one 50 ARE terrible...like me.

  • 07.23.2010 12:32 PM PDT

Eat my blue balls.

Posted by: JamezIsABEAST
Posted by: RAWR ima Tryhard
Posted by: JamezIsABEAST
50?

You know whats terrible though? Kids with no linked GT who act like that have 50s (like the guy above). People like that I just wanna vomit on over and over until they are completely covered in my puke.


You don't need a linked GT to have an opinion. If you're gonna force your opinion on people then you better have a linked GT


He goes around in every thread talking about how he has all these 50s.

Chances are hes a brig/colonel that always wanted a 50 so this is how he plays out his fantasy.


He has multiple 50's that he frequently plays on, which is something that you DON'T do.

Try harder.

  • 07.23.2010 12:38 PM PDT

Posted by: SilverBulitt82
Posted by: HL Doubles
ranks dont tell anything ive been kicked in the face by a field major before ........he was reeeelllyyy gooood


Very true...ive seen all different ranks do incredibly awsome and some do incredibly awful...everyone has good playing day's and bad playing day's.


I too have been owned by field majors before...
Rank doesn't reflect skill because many people who don't take the game seriously from day one but a year or more down the line decide to kick ranked into submission find themselves victim of trueskill and cannot rank past 41-ish. Most people will never have a problem until 44,45 i personally don't play much ranked, im waiting for reach. Bearing in mind in reach rank will be judged so differently that trueskill wont be able to block out people from ranking up.

Worst-case scenario: that leiutenant 4shotted me so many times........

  • 07.23.2010 12:40 PM PDT

Eat my blue balls.

Posted by: XTL TYR4NT TX
Posted by: SilverBulitt82
Posted by: HL Doubles
ranks dont tell anything ive been kicked in the face by a field major before ........he was reeeelllyyy gooood


Very true...ive seen all different ranks do incredibly awsome and some do incredibly awful...everyone has good playing day's and bad playing day's.


I too have been owned by field majors before...
Rank doesn't reflect skill because many people who don't take the game seriously from day one but a year or more down the line decide to kick ranked into submission find themselves victim of trueskill and cannot rank past 41-ish. Most people will never have a problem until 44,45 i personally don't play much ranked, im waiting for reach. Bearing in mind in reach rank will be judged so differently that trueskill wont be able to block out people from ranking up.

Worst-case scenario: that leiutenant 4shotted me so many times........


I'm walking proof that Rank-Lock doesn't exist. I got my 50 after I had enough experience to get my 5-star.

  • 07.23.2010 12:44 PM PDT
  • gamertag: RailV
  • user homepage:

51.
There are only a handful of people who are actually good at this game out of how many people play it.

  • 07.23.2010 12:58 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Thnx for the awesome sig Smyf!

and now it is my duty to completely drain you

3+ 50s: possibly good
1-2 50s: mediocre at best
47-49: might understand the game
30-46: bad
1-29: new to the game/possibly disabled (mentally or physically)

  • 07.23.2010 1:09 PM PDT

"Where are you, God, you f.ucking f.aggot? Come and get me!" Neil Armstrong

Posted by: iRec7ifY
30-46: bad

-blam!-

  • 07.23.2010 1:16 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

At least 4, if not more, 50s.

  • 07.23.2010 1:18 PM PDT

Here's the final verdict. Rank doesn't mean -blam!-! I'm new to Halo, just now playing it so I will be ready for Reach. I'm a solid player, and I'm not ranked high.

While we're talking about rank, can someone explain how it works please?

  • 07.23.2010 2:04 PM PDT

You got stuck by FalconStickr

People will most likely say 50 but im a 35 and can wreck on the high ranking players

  • 07.23.2010 2:05 PM PDT

Hi. I'm going to play a game with you. First one to read my signature loses.


Posted by: RAWR ima Tryhard

Posted by: JamezIsABEAST
50?

You know whats terrible though? Kids with no linked GT who act like that have 50s (like the guy above). People like that I just wanna vomit on over and over until they are completely covered in my puke.


You don't need a linked GT to have an opinion. If you're gonna force your opinion on people then you better have a linked GT
Amen.

  • 07.23.2010 2:06 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Junior Dos Santos, know the name, he's the future.

BLACK POWER!


Posted by: somebuddy

Posted by: RAWR ima Tryhard
50


Most be in multiple playlists, at minimum 3 50s.

fixed to my opinion.

  • 07.23.2010 2:08 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Junior Dos Santos, know the name, he's the future.

BLACK POWER!


Posted by: iRec7ifY
3+ 50s: possibly good
1-2 50s: mediocre at best
47-49: might understand the game
30-46: bad
1-29: new to the game/possibly disabled (mentally or physically)

QFT

  • 07.23.2010 2:09 PM PDT

Eat my blue balls.

Posted by: FalconStickr
People will most likely say 50 but im a 35 and can wreck on the high ranking players


That's not true, or you'd win enough to rank up to a 50.

  • 07.23.2010 2:23 PM PDT

____________(˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜˜)_∏______
l ---------____.`=====.-.~:________\___|================[oo]
|_|||___/___/_/~```|_|_|_|``(o)----------<)

Im Russian, deal with it.
Im not responsible for what you do with my advice.

The way you perform in-game is how good you are.

  • 07.23.2010 2:24 PM PDT

Hi. I'm going to play a game with you. First one to read my signature loses.


Posted by: raiderftball64

Posted by: iRec7ifY
3+ 50s: possibly good
1-2 50s: mediocre at best
47-49: might understand the game
30-46: bad
1-29: new to the game/possibly disabled (mentally or physically)

QFT
hooray for stereotypes :p

  • 07.23.2010 2:25 PM PDT

Better luck next time buddy.

I'm a 40, I know it's not good but I consider other 40 better than me and I found some Force Colonel out there who were beast. So achieved the best skill you can achieve and enjoy it. Anyway, it's just a game so having a 50 or not does'nt mean anything important.

  • 07.23.2010 2:32 PM PDT

Man, I miss dem Halo 3 days :'(

IMO, you have to have a 45. (In a respectable playlist, not swat, grifball, living dead).

It is rare to find a good player below 45, and a lot of 45's suck too. However, you will find many reasonable-good players from 45-49.

  • 07.23.2010 3:09 PM PDT