Halo 3 Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Here is a simple explanation of what bungie has done and for us.
  • Subject: Here is a simple explanation of what bungie has done and for us.
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4
Subject: Here is a simple explanation of what bungie has done and for us.

This is my personal opinion, if you dont like it then please dont flame.
Thanks

Ethan(iBreak SkuLLz)

Ok, lets think of Bungie as our best friend.
Now lets say that Halo, Halo2, Halo3, and Halo ODST are girls that our best friend(Bungie) hooked us up with.
Halo and Halo 2 were nice girls, they introduced us into the whole dating world(1st person shooters). Then one day our best friend introduced us to one of the best girls you have ever seen, yes she has some flaws but she is also one amazing girl(halo 3). Then your best friend says he has a new girl you need to meet(ODST), she ends up being a complete tease, and you go back to that amazing girl. Then after nearly 3years of seeing this special girl(Halo3) your best friend comes up to you saying they have an amazing girl you have to meet(Halo:Reach), you ask for a photo, and they show one(Reach Beta). It turns out to be a fat and just plane hideous looking girl(Reach Beta). Definitly nothing like the girls he(bungie) has introduced to you, and you think how he could do something like this to you, he gave you amazing girls(halo1,2,3) then he gave u a tease(ODST) now this????? WTH is wrong with them. They are ruining the name of Halo.

  • 08.01.2010 7:03 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Junior Dos Santos, know the name, he's the future.

BLACK POWER!

lol well said

  • 08.01.2010 7:05 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Junior Dos Santos, know the name, he's the future.

BLACK POWER!


Posted by: r3x f3r4l
1) Reach looks amazing, so your analogy is bad....

2) fat chicks do more....

oh my..

  • 08.01.2010 7:07 PM PDT

I dont think you got it, Reach is NOT a halo game. yea it could be a good game but it should not have the name halo in it

  • 08.01.2010 7:08 PM PDT


Posted by: iBreaK SkuLLz
I dont think you got it, Reach is NOT a halo game. yea it could be a good game but it should not have the name halo in it

...Halo: Reach is called Halo: Reach because it's a Halo game made by the people who originally made Halo.
If you just want to rant about Reach, why don't you just go into the Halo: Reach forum?

  • 08.01.2010 7:10 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Junior Dos Santos, know the name, he's the future.

BLACK POWER!


Posted by: r3x f3r4l

Posted by: raiderftball64

Posted by: r3x f3r4l
1) Reach looks amazing, so your analogy is bad....

2) fat chicks do more....

oh my..



that response made me lol for some reason....when you said it did it come out as a shocked old woman "oh my"?

no like a fat middle aged woman, like the sham wow spoof where the woman says i cant take one more bite

  • 08.01.2010 7:16 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: r3x f3r4l
1) Reach looks amazing, so your analogy is bad....

2) fat chicks do more....


1. No. He's correct.

2. No. Just no.

3. I find it hilarious that Bungie says Reach is the most definitive "Halo" there is yet; that it is the ultimate Halo game. If so, what in the royal -blam!- were they doing when they created Halo CE, H2, H3, and ODST? /mini rant.

As you were.

  • 08.01.2010 7:22 PM PDT

Hi. I'm going to play a game with you. First one to read my signature loses.

hahahahaha

  • 08.01.2010 7:23 PM PDT

Hi. I'm going to play a game with you. First one to read my signature loses.

---

[Edited on 08.01.2010 7:35 PM PDT]

  • 08.01.2010 7:34 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: r3x f3r4l
Without saying BR, tell me what is so bad about Reach?

Also, yes...they do more...lots more...

Your 3rd point almost caused a stroke when I read it...are you serious?



1. Of course I can. First off, it's full of gimmicks. The loadouts are essentially useless, especially the shield one. They add nothing of any true significance to gameplay and are essentially there to make people go "Wow, cool!" and buy the product. Yes, that's what Bungie wants to do, but by the same token, don't they owe something to their loyal followers who have been with them since the beginning?

Second, the movement speed and overall feel of the Reach Beta was wonky. It was as though the gamer was disconnected from the in-game environment (this isn't just my opinion.) Furthermore, the maps available were -blam!- ( while this doesn't entirely reflect the final product, it certainly partially does so), and were essentially one sided. What would you rather do, spawn down bottom on Powerhouse, without the height advantage or much cover, or spawn up top with buildings, a height advantage, and rockets (which by the way were WAY overpowered, but I won't get into that.)

As for the fat girls doing more thing...more isn't always better. Surely you're mature enough to realize this. I'd take a kiss from a girl that I actually liked over random sex with an obese chick any day of the week.

Finally, how does Reach not seem to stray far away from the other Halo games? Especially the loadouts, which are an entirely new (and IMO stupid) addition.

[Edited on 08.01.2010 7:39 PM PDT]

  • 08.01.2010 7:39 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

They made Halo They can do what they want with it

  • 08.01.2010 7:39 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Got Halo questions? You found the answers.
<3 the DMR


Posted by: iBreaK SkuLLz
I dont think you got it, Reach is NOT a halo game. yea it could be a good game but it should not have the name halo in it


Reach is the closest thing to the Original Halo since its release. It also carries the Halo title. How the hell isn't this a Halo game?

  • 08.01.2010 7:40 PM PDT

Hi. I'm going to play a game with you. First one to read my signature loses.

Posted by: Bobby Da Fish

Posted by: iBreaK SkuLLz
I dont think you got it, Reach is NOT a halo game. yea it could be a good game but it should not have the name halo in it


Reach is the closest thing to the Original Halo since its release. It also carries the Halo title. How the hell isn't this a Halo game?
Java and javascript both have 'java' in their name but are entirely different. No, Reach is not close at all to the original halo. not even in the slightest bit.

  • 08.01.2010 7:43 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Bungie wanted to make halo that goes to the story of the fall reach , which is the planet of the spartan project so it is a "Halo" game

  • 08.01.2010 7:48 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

San Antonio Spurs|||Rocafella 4ever Hov 4 life
Welcome to Havana Smoking Cubana’s with Castro in cabanas
Viva Mexico Cubano Dominicano, all the plugs that I know
Driving Benzes with no benefits
Not bad, huh, for some immigrants?
Build your fences, we digging tunnels
Can’t you see we gettin money up under you?

Its almost as if you have no idea what you are talking about

  • 08.01.2010 7:49 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

San Antonio Spurs|||Rocafella 4ever Hov 4 life
Welcome to Havana Smoking Cubana’s with Castro in cabanas
Viva Mexico Cubano Dominicano, all the plugs that I know
Driving Benzes with no benefits
Not bad, huh, for some immigrants?
Build your fences, we digging tunnels
Can’t you see we gettin money up under you?

OP you have no idea what youre talking about, you sound like halo 3 is the only halo you've played. Reach is going to be a good game and this is coming from someone who likes halo 3 a lot

  • 08.01.2010 7:50 PM PDT

If you think Halo 3 is the best out of the series that you have no -blam!- clue as to what you are talking about.

  • 08.01.2010 7:52 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: r3x f3r4l
Posted by: SirSire
1. Of course I can. First off, it's full of gimmicks. The loadouts are essentially useless, especially the shield one. They add nothing of any true significance to gameplay and are essentially there to make people go "Wow, cool!" and buy the product. Yes, that's what Bungie wants to do, but by the same token, don't they owe something to their loyal followers who have been with them since the beginning?

Second, the movement speed and overall feel of the Reach Beta was wonky. It was as though the gamer was disconnected from the in-game environment (this isn't just my opinion.) Furthermore, the maps available were -blam!- ( while this doesn't entirely reflect the final product, it certainly partially does so), and were essentially one sided. What would you rather do, spawn down bottom on Powerhouse, without the height advantage or much cover, or spawn up top with buildings, a height advantage, and rockets (which by the way were WAY overpowered, but I won't get into that.)

As for the fat girls doing more thing...more isn't always better. Surely you're mature enough to realize this. I'd take a kiss from a girl that I actually liked over random sex with an obese chick any day of the week.

Finally, how does Reach not seem to stray far away from the other Halo games? Especially the loadouts, which are an entirely new (and IMO stupid) addition.

OH NO! they added things to your precious Halo....I'm one of these "loyal followers who have been with them since the beginning" I think what they did will make the game even better...

do you know WHY they did the Beta? Obviously not, otherwise you wouldn't be complaining about it...


Also, this is the internet, lighten up...


Finally, it still feels like Halo through and through...and the loadouts are static....you can't customize your weapons in MM, unlike certain -blam!- games which you are comparing Halo to and probably play yourself....other than the extra button your push before spawning in some gametypes, how does it feel different?

To start, yes, I understand it's a Beta, and I also understand what a Beta is. They're not going to change the game 180 degrees though. The final product is, in all probability, going to be essentially the same as the Beta. Sure, there will be tweaks and changes, but nothing overly drastic. It took Bungie three years to come out with this game: they're not going to change it all around a few months prior to release.

And yes, I'm comparing Reach to CoD. Why? Because I see similarities. I'd also like to point out that I don't play MW2, or any CoD games whatsoever. I've tried them, but they don't interest me. Halo 3 on the other hand...

  • 08.01.2010 7:54 PM PDT

Eat, Sleep, Row


Posted by: SirSire

Posted by: r3x f3r4l
Without saying BR, tell me what is so bad about Reach?

Also, yes...they do more...lots more...

Your 3rd point almost caused a stroke when I read it...are you serious?



1. Of course I can. First off, it's full of gimmicks. The loadouts are essentially useless, especially the shield one. They add nothing of any true significance to gameplay and are essentially there to make people go "Wow, cool!" and buy the product. Yes, that's what Bungie wants to do, but by the same token, don't they owe something to their loyal followers who have been with them since the beginning?

Second, the movement speed and overall feel of the Reach Beta was wonky. It was as though the gamer was disconnected from the in-game environment (this isn't just my opinion.) Furthermore, the maps available were -blam!- ( while this doesn't entirely reflect the final product, it certainly partially does so), and were essentially one sided. What would you rather do, spawn down bottom on Powerhouse, without the height advantage or much cover, or spawn up top with buildings, a height advantage, and rockets (which by the way were WAY overpowered, but I won't get into that.)

As for the fat girls doing more thing...more isn't always better. Surely you're mature enough to realize this. I'd take a kiss from a girl that I actually liked over random sex with an obese chick any day of the week.

Finally, how does Reach not seem to stray far away from the other Halo games? Especially the loadouts, which are an entirely new (and IMO stupid) addition.

Um its a Beta. It can and has been fixed

  • 08.01.2010 7:56 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4