- monkyw1thagun
- |
- Exalted Legendary Member
Posted by: DAS B00T x2
Posted by: nam090
The Carbine sucks. It's only half-decent at close to medium range, but it absolutely fails at medium-range. Why? Because the shots don't go to the middle of the reticle. They usually end up around the center of it, which causes you to miss headshots. It's a step down from the BR, but it definitely is better than not having an entry-level mid-range weapon as your secondary.
And someone show me proof that it can kill faster than a BR. I dare you. Video evidence please, and perhaps even charts would do.
Not the best proof, but it's proof. The carbine kills faster, if you can aim with it.
This video is very inaccurate. The BR has a 4 shot. The carbine doesnt. Look how many shots the BR took. Way more then 4. Also look at the pause the person with the BR took between the 2nd and 3rd shot. It was unnecessary, it is like he paused on purpose to let the guy with the carbine win. Anyways the BR is a better weapon because of the 4 shot. Don't get me wrong, the carbine is a great weapon and can be very deadly. In the hands of a good player it is a powerful weapon. I find it very blinding because of the bright colors its bullets are. That makes it harder to aim at the opponent firing at you with it. The only think i do not like about the carbine is the small clip. If it had a longer clip, it would be better then the BR. But since the BR has the 4 shot and the Carbine has a small clip, the BR is the better weapon in my opinion. This is just my view on the BR/carbine.
Also just to add in the 2nd duel it took the player with the BR 6 shots before the guy with the carbine could kill him. Like I said before, it only takes 4 shots to kill someone with a BR. That was just bad aim. The BR was misrepresented in that video.
[Edited on 08.27.2010 11:33 PM PDT]