Halo 3 Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Why Do Colonels Always Use the AR?
  • Subject: Why Do Colonels Always Use the AR?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4
Subject: Why Do Colonels Always Use the AR?

Posted by: Emperor7928
Why are you GENERALizing?


Use quotes

  • 08.18.2010 6:09 PM PDT


Posted by: Brigadier Fox
If colonels were "whipping butt," they wouldn't be stuck at their rank.[/quote]

Not every colonel wants to rank up


You don't just magically rank up by "wanting" it. Trueskill doesn't exactly factor that in.

You rank up by winning. If he was "whipping butt" like he says then he'd win and no longer be a colonel.


Posted by: Brigadier Fox

just because they cant rank up doesnt mean they suck bro.


That's exactly what it means.



[Edited on 08.18.2010 6:10 PM PDT]

  • 08.18.2010 6:10 PM PDT

Brigadier Fox, Reporting for duty.

Steam Profile Page

Groups I recommend
-UWG


Posted by: Ultim8Lemusnator
You just said it bro: "like social more"
and you know why they like it more?? because in social they are retarded guest and people that suck like them so they can get a kill.



once again not true, i play Action sack because of the random gametypes so you dont get so much repetition because im easily bored, plus by your statement your saying everyone who plays social more is not good as people who play rank, which is also not true.

  • 08.18.2010 6:10 PM PDT

Brigadier Fox, Reporting for duty.

Steam Profile Page

Groups I recommend
-UWG


Posted by: Spurs
why is every colonel bashing my thread? I just want to know?


I'm not colonel and there bashing your thread because your hating on them bro.

  • 08.18.2010 6:12 PM PDT


Posted by: Brigadier Fox

Posted by: Ultim8Lemusnator
You just said it bro: "like social more"
and you know why they like it more?? because in social they are retarded guest and people that suck like them so they can get a kill.



once again not true, i play Action sack because of the random gametypes so you dont get so much repetition because im easily bored, plus by your statement your saying everyone who plays social more is not good as people who play rank, which is also not true.


By logic someone with 1000 ranked games and 500 social games should beat someone with 500 ranked and 1000 social.
And you are giving me the reason. You play action sack because they are games like rockets with low gravity or no skill thing.... but its nice that you have fun =)

  • 08.18.2010 6:14 PM PDT

Brigadier Fox, Reporting for duty.

Steam Profile Page

Groups I recommend
-UWG

By logic someone with 1000 ranked games and 500 social games should beat someone with 500 ranked and 1000 social.
And you are giving me the reason. You play action sack because they are games like rockets with low gravity or no skill thing.... but its nice that you have fun =)


That actually has no logic, because those 1000 social games could all be Br matches and those 1000 ranked matches could be Ranked Grifball, so your point is not Valid

  • 08.18.2010 6:19 PM PDT


Posted by: Brigadier Fox
By logic someone with 1000 ranked games and 500 social games should beat someone with 500 ranked and 1000 social.
And you are giving me the reason. You play action sack because they are games like rockets with low gravity or no skill thing.... but its nice that you have fun =)


That actually has no logic, because those 1000 social games could all be Br matches and those 1000 ranked matches could be Ranked Grifball, so your point is not Valid


There are ranked griffball matches like once in a year and Br matches r less possible than Ar matches so your logic its invalid because of the simple maths

  • 08.18.2010 6:24 PM PDT

Who General's troll?

[Edited on 08.18.2010 6:28 PM PDT]

  • 08.18.2010 6:26 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

@OP You have like 11,000 Social games played, and like 3,000 Ranked. Your a bad 50.

  • 08.18.2010 6:27 PM PDT

Brigadier Fox, Reporting for duty.

Steam Profile Page

Groups I recommend
-UWG


Posted by: Ultim8Lemusnator

Posted by: Brigadier Fox
By logic someone with 1000 ranked games and 500 social games should beat someone with 500 ranked and 1000 social.
And you are giving me the reason. You play action sack because they are games like rockets with low gravity or no skill thing.... but its nice that you have fun =)


That actually has no logic, because those 1000 social games could all be Br matches and those 1000 ranked matches could be Ranked Grifball, so your point is not Valid


There are ranked griffball matches like once in a year and Br matches r less possible than Ar matches so your logic its invalid because of the simple maths


That still doesnt matter, do you really need a nother example? fine then, how about this, 1000 social slayer matches and the other guy as 1000 ranked team slayer matches, but does little work and gets carried by boosters the whole time, Happy?

  • 08.18.2010 6:27 PM PDT

I am part of Forerunner Conflict, it is a war sim clan that has been going on for 5 years, if you would like to join or learn more about it feel free to message me

i didnt know colonels were restricted not too, i have 50s that AR Rush me all the time

  • 08.18.2010 6:28 PM PDT


Posted by: Brigadier Fox

Posted by: Ultim8Lemusnator

Posted by: Brigadier Fox
By logic someone with 1000 ranked games and 500 social games should beat someone with 500 ranked and 1000 social.
And you are giving me the reason. You play action sack because they are games like rockets with low gravity or no skill thing.... but its nice that you have fun =)


That actually has no logic, because those 1000 social games could all be Br matches and those 1000 ranked matches could be Ranked Grifball, so your point is not Valid


There are ranked griffball matches like once in a year and Br matches r less possible than Ar matches so your logic its invalid because of the simple maths


That still doesnt matter, do you really need a nother example? fine then, how about this, 1000 social slayer matches and the other guy as 1000 ranked team slayer matches, but does little work and gets carried by boosters the whole time, Happy?


Im talking about legit people, not kids.

  • 08.18.2010 6:29 PM PDT


Posted by: I2egicide
@OP You have like 11,000 Social games played, and like 3,000 Ranked. Your a bad 50.


umad cuz im 50 and you not :D

  • 08.18.2010 6:29 PM PDT


Posted by: Brigadier Fox

Posted by: Ultim8Lemusnator

Posted by: Brigadier Fox
By logic someone with 1000 ranked games and 500 social games should beat someone with 500 ranked and 1000 social.
And you are giving me the reason. You play action sack because they are games like rockets with low gravity or no skill thing.... but its nice that you have fun =)


That actually has no logic, because those 1000 social games could all be Br matches and those 1000 ranked matches could be Ranked Grifball, so your point is not Valid


There are ranked griffball matches like once in a year and Br matches r less possible than Ar matches so your logic its invalid because of the simple maths


That still doesnt matter, do you really need a nother example? fine then, how about this, 1000 social slayer matches and the other guy as 1000 ranked team slayer matches, but does little work and gets carried by boosters the whole time, Happy?


Stop coming up with retarded exceptions. The person who chooses ranked will almost always be better. The exception is not the rule.

  • 08.18.2010 6:30 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Spurs

Posted by: I2egicide
@OP You have like 11,000 Social games played, and like 3,000 Ranked. Your a bad 50.


umad cuz im 50 and you not :D

2/10 Trolling. The Colonel thing is so overused these days.

  • 08.18.2010 6:31 PM PDT


Posted by: EndGame747

Posted by: Brigadier Fox

Posted by: Ultim8Lemusnator

Posted by: Brigadier Fox
By logic someone with 1000 ranked games and 500 social games should beat someone with 500 ranked and 1000 social.
And you are giving me the reason. You play action sack because they are games like rockets with low gravity or no skill thing.... but its nice that you have fun =)


That actually has no logic, because those 1000 social games could all be Br matches and those 1000 ranked matches could be Ranked Grifball, so your point is not Valid


There are ranked griffball matches like once in a year and Br matches r less possible than Ar matches so your logic its invalid because of the simple maths


That still doesnt matter, do you really need a nother example? fine then, how about this, 1000 social slayer matches and the other guy as 1000 ranked team slayer matches, but does little work and gets carried by boosters the whole time, Happy?


Stop coming up with retarded exceptions. The person who chooses ranked will almost always be better. The exception is not the rule.


Sorry but your wrong

http://www.bungie.net/stats/halo3/default.aspx?player=killz%2 0man%20of%20H

  • 08.18.2010 6:32 PM PDT

I am part of Forerunner Conflict, it is a war sim clan that has been going on for 5 years, if you would like to join or learn more about it feel free to message me


Posted by: Spurs

Posted by: I2egicide
@OP You have like 11,000 Social games played, and like 3,000 Ranked. Your a bad 50.


umad cuz im 50 and you not :D


completely uncalled for

  • 08.18.2010 6:33 PM PDT

Brigadier Fox, Reporting for duty.

Steam Profile Page

Groups I recommend
-UWG

how about this Endgame and the other guy, you keeping arguing about your point of view, and i will go back to listening Metal and playing Xbl instead of wasting my time arguing with people about thier opinions. Have fun =D

[Edited on 08.18.2010 6:34 PM PDT]

  • 08.18.2010 6:34 PM PDT


Posted by: Spurs
Sorry but your wrong

http://www.bungie.net/stats/halo3/default.aspx?player=killz%2 0man%20of%20H


"The exception is not the rule."

Can you not read or do you just not speak English?

Edit:
Besides, this is assuming two people of equal capability.

In other words, if YOU had your social and ranked games reversed, you would undoubtedly be better than you are now.

Likewise, if that guy you quoted had his social and ranked games reversed, he would have learned even less and been even worse than he is now.

[Edited on 08.18.2010 6:38 PM PDT]

  • 08.18.2010 6:34 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

If it's not broken we'll fix until it is.

-Bungie

I don't, I despise the AR.

  • 08.18.2010 6:35 PM PDT

I'm almost a Brigadier, I use the BR over the AR.

  • 08.18.2010 6:35 PM PDT

Join the Spartan I Project today!

Make Friends, Blow Stuff Up, Get Achievements


The Day Respawn Stood Still

The more important question is, why does any rank matter? Reach will come out in a month, so all these arguements about rank are going to be completely invalid by the time Reach comes.

And yes, Im a Colonel, and your a General. Generals usually have no life because they play a video game and trash talk online because they know they cant get their ass kicked in real life if they said it to somebody's face.

  • 08.18.2010 6:43 PM PDT


Posted by: EndGame747

Posted by: Spurs
Sorry but your wrong

http://www.bungie.net/stats/halo3/default.aspx?player=killz%2 0man%20of%20H


"The exception is not the rule."

Can you not read or do you just not speak English?

Edit:
Besides, this is assuming two people of equal capability.

In other words, if YOU had your social and ranked games reversed, you would undoubtedly be better than you are now.

Likewise, if that guy you quoted had his social and ranked games reversed, he would have learned even less and been even worse than he is now.


ACTUALLY if ur always going aginist captains and majors in ranked you will never learn how to play good

if he played more social he would eventually learn from higher ranks

  • 08.18.2010 6:44 PM PDT


Posted by: Ham Bro
The more important question is, why does any rank matter? Reach will come out in a month, so all these arguements about rank are going to be completely invalid by the time Reach comes.

And yes, Im a Colonel, and your a General. Generals usually have no life because they play a video game and trash talk online because they know they cant get their ass kicked in real life if they said it to somebody's face.



Nope ur wrong http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cbl9Qbjc2so

  • 08.18.2010 6:45 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4