- EndGame747
- |
- Noble Member
Posted by: Grouptage
Posted by: EndGame747
Posted by: Grouptage
If is BR was perfect, yeah.
Think aimbot perfect, this argument has shown up a few times on the MLG forums, where it's a team of 4 pros, vs 3 players whom aren't good strategically, but cannot miss a shot.
After alot of debate, it was generally agreed that the aimbotters would win. I've played against numerous people with aimbots, and it's nearly impossible to beat them.
I don't remember seeing that, do you have the link?
I don't think "not strategically good" is really the same as a LW 40. The aimbotters in such a case would at least know enough of the basics to get a 40 on their own, while I doubt a LW colonel could get past a 25. I think the skill gap would just be far too great. I'm just imagining them running straight towards hill every spawn and that "perfect shot" not even coming into play.
Although I will agree that the "running 4s" part is a good point. There is significantly less thinking involved when you're on the same page.
There's alot more thought that goes into it when two teams of 4 face off than when two teams of randoms face off...I think you agreed with the exact opposite of my point :/
I'm not going to hunt through the MLG site for that thread, you can try the searchbar, I remember seeing it sometime last summer.
I meant for this case specifically, running 4s would be better since his teammates expect that he doesn't know how to play and could tell him what to do.
Although even with that, I think they would be better off with someone who at least knows what flag juggling is, lol