Halo 3 Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [13 votes]: Spartan ||| or Spartan ||
  • Poll [13 votes]: Spartan ||| or Spartan ||
Subject: Spartan ||| or Spartan ||

Poll: Spartan ||| or Spartan ||  [closed]
Spartan |||:  31%
(4 Votes)
Spartan ||:  69%
(9 Votes)
Can't decide:  0%
(0 Votes)
Total Votes: 13

Spartan ||| are better in strategy, better trained, and better in almost everything else, but which one do you like more.

[Edited on 09.01.2010 8:53 AM PDT]

  • 09.01.2010 8:05 AM PDT


Ooh, I love those people, the ones who decide to throw everything and the kitchen sink at you, as if an M16 does anything to a T-90. Oh, MLG player with noobtube instead? Congrats! You blew off one of my ablative plates!

Gun, meet Bad Guy.
Bad Guy, this is Gun.

spartan III`s

i like them better

  • 09.01.2010 8:12 AM PDT

Spartan IIs are better in combat actually. Spartan IIs were very expensive to create, however. Spartan IIIs were designed to be disposable heroes.

  • 09.01.2010 8:24 AM PDT
  • gamertag: Rtma
  • user homepage:

Click the Link to find out more about myself. Click Here

READ FIRST PLEASE! Please stop sending me Group invitations, it's not that I don't appreciate it it's just not going to work out for me considering the variables, Time zone differences, Mentality, motivation etc, Thank you for your consideration, Rtma Eros Paragon out.

Dragon, Sorry.

  • 09.01.2010 8:51 AM PDT

By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.

Spartan-IIs are so boring (most of them, anyway), a lot of them have the same basic background history and are always in the public eye.

Spartan-IIIs are different. They operate behind-the-scenes, they're heroes that very few people know to exist. They're less developed than Spartan-IIs too, which means they have to stick together as a team which really personifies them more and makes them much more human.

S-IIIs are one of the best things that happened to Halo.

  • 09.01.2010 8:54 AM PDT

Spartan II's are actualy stronger because they had the biological augumentations.

  • 09.01.2010 10:03 AM PDT

Go Reach.


Posted by: X El BaZzA X
Spartan IIs are better in combat actually. Spartan IIs were very expensive to create, however. Spartan IIIs were designed to be disposable heroes.


Yep, Spartan IIIs are more reconnaissance based as well. They have less strong armor but they can cloak like elites. Spartan IIs where, as said before, very expensive because of the armor, the training, the augmentations, etc. Many died because of the augmentations too. Yes I have read all the books :D

  • 09.01.2010 10:24 AM PDT

By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.

Posted by: killfrenzy9
Spartan II's are actualy stronger because they had the biological augumentations.


Spartan-IIIs recieve the same kind of augmentations as Spartan-IIs, the difference is is that S-IIIs have a 0% casualty rate for the augmentation process but S-IIs have about 56%.

  • 09.01.2010 10:40 AM PDT