- The Elite Elite
- |
- Exalted Heroic Member
I like Call of Duty and Gears of War, AND Halo. Why must everyone else like only one or the other?
Posted by: n0llemaster
Posted by: The Elite Elite
Posted by: n0llemaster
Halo 3 is an awesome game but Halo Reach is certainly much better in my opinion, here's why:
-I like bloom
-The Armor Abilities make the game so much more interesting
-The game play itself is incredibly balanced
And here are some arguments based on facts:
-More customizable options
-Halo Reach has more replay value
-Better UI and File share options
-Better netcode
Claiming that Reach is broken is just plain ridiculous, Halo 3 isn't perfect either. It's just the nostalgia that keeps most players loyal to Halo 3. The same thing happened when Halo 3 was just released, Halo 2 veterans just kept on complaining how Halo 3 sucked.
Please respect my opinion
How is that a fact? If one thinks Halo 3 is better, than Halo 3 is going to have more replay value.
Well, I believe from a practical point of view that commendations, firefight 2.0, new forge options etc. offer more replay value than Halo 3's options and gametypes.
I'm just saying, very concise, how Halo Reach's mostly superior options, increase Reach's replay value (in theory).
Reach offers the opportunity for greater replay value. But having those extra options doesn't make a game you don't like any better. Halo 2 had no commendations, no firefight, no forge, and no achievements, yet I played way more Halo 2 on Live than I have of Halo 3, ODST, and Reach combined. (However, I admit that's not quite fair to compare. Halo 2 has been out a lot longer, and was out at a time when there weren't many other games to compete against on Live, whereas Halo 3 and Reach have to compete against games like Call of Duty and Gears of War.)