Halo 3 Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: halo 3 still has derankers..
  • Subject: halo 3 still has derankers..
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: halo 3 still has derankers..

i could rank up if i was actually trying and if i didnt have to deal with f@gg0ts like you. stop rationalizing your f@gg0tism and admit you do nothing but ruin the game.

  • 10.15.2010 10:14 PM PDT


Posted by: OGM RECONNN
When? show me the game to prove it. and why does everyone keep countering my arguments by trying to say im not good? and i'll 1v1 you if you think ur so better than me.
Look at your last MLG game.

  • 10.15.2010 10:14 PM PDT

if i go alot negative in my last game its because i kept playing untill i got too tired to continue trying.

  • 10.15.2010 10:15 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Meagss
  • user homepage:

I play games for gameplay, not silly gimmicks

H3 MM warrior

Reach S7, 8 and 9 arena warrior.

H4 MM legend


Posted by: OGM RECONNN
if i go alot negative in my last game its because i kept playing untill i got too tired to continue trying.


Its not just one game though, you consistently go negative playing brigs and colonels, even games you win, I see you going negaitive

  • 10.15.2010 10:16 PM PDT

well if its an objective game i don't worry about my kd spread and focus more on the objective/am always the martyr for the team. and when im playing at my best/ had enough practice or havent been playing for too damn long i can go plenty positive.

  • 10.15.2010 10:19 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Meagss
  • user homepage:

I play games for gameplay, not silly gimmicks

H3 MM warrior

Reach S7, 8 and 9 arena warrior.

H4 MM legend


Posted by: OGM RECONNN
well if its an objective game i don't worry about my kd spread and focus more on the objective/am always the martyr for the team. and when im playing at my best/ had enough practice or havent been playing for too damn long i can go plenty positive.


Thats alot of ifs and ands to for going positive at 30 high MLG.

  • 10.15.2010 10:20 PM PDT

what is your point? i can do just fine for my team over all when im playing good, and it would definately be rewarded if it werent for god damn derankers or an account lock.

  • 10.15.2010 10:23 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Meagss
  • user homepage:

I play games for gameplay, not silly gimmicks

H3 MM warrior

Reach S7, 8 and 9 arena warrior.

H4 MM legend


Posted by: OGM RECONNN
what is your point? i can do just fine for my team over all when im playing good, and it would definately be rewarded if it werent for god damn derankers or an account lock.


Rank locks dont exist btw, and again at 40 high MLG there arent any derankers, so whats the issue, if you can win alot in a row do it. You will go up eventually, and according to you you cant go up with derankers anyway

  • 10.15.2010 10:26 PM PDT

how many times are you going to prove your idiocy? my 36/40 mlg level is silver, and my level 30 is account locked, maybe not 100% locked but VERY well locked, and theres -blam!- loads of derankers in it.

  • 10.15.2010 10:28 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Meagss
  • user homepage:

I play games for gameplay, not silly gimmicks

H3 MM warrior

Reach S7, 8 and 9 arena warrior.

H4 MM legend


Posted by: OGM RECONNN
how many times are you going to prove your idiocy? my 36/40 mlg level is silver, and my level 30 is account locked, maybe not 100% locked but VERY well locked, and theres -blam!- loads of derankers in it.


That would be fine to understand, but I dont see any derankers recently... All I see is you going negative almost every game. Dont blame derankers on your ability

  • 10.15.2010 10:30 PM PDT

no you dont retard. 1: youre not playing at the right levels, 2: i dont play on that account anymore and those games you looked at are NOT an accurate measure of my skill. i currently just started playing on the accounts Klownlookinbozo and ifacko that i borrowed from my friend.

it is a FACT that the game is absolutely flooded with derankers that ruin this game and its because of people like you.

  • 10.15.2010 10:34 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Meagss
  • user homepage:

I play games for gameplay, not silly gimmicks

H3 MM warrior

Reach S7, 8 and 9 arena warrior.

H4 MM legend

you are still consistently going negative on both those accounts

  • 10.15.2010 10:45 PM PDT

you don't know what you're talking about. if i do go neg its not that much, and only some of the time when i have -blam!- legit level 9 etc team mates/ derankers on my team vs a team of 50s on fresh accounts etc. so theres not much to help me from getting tripple br'd etc.

[Edited on 10.15.2010 10:55 PM PDT]

  • 10.15.2010 10:48 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Meagss
  • user homepage:

I play games for gameplay, not silly gimmicks

H3 MM warrior

Reach S7, 8 and 9 arena warrior.

H4 MM legend


Posted by: OGM RECONNN
you don't know what you're talking about. if i do go neg its not that much, and only some of the time when i have -blam!- legit level 9 etc team mates/ derankers on my team vs a team of 50s on fresh accounts etc. so theres not much to help me from getting tripple br'd etc.


I know what im talking about when I say your bad

  • 10.15.2010 10:57 PM PDT

arguing with you is hopeless. stfu and go ruin someone elses game experience.

  • 10.15.2010 11:00 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Meagss
  • user homepage:

I play games for gameplay, not silly gimmicks

H3 MM warrior

Reach S7, 8 and 9 arena warrior.

H4 MM legend

How did I ruin your experiance, you are losing because you are bad, dont blame losing on other people when it is your fault. And yes I have a booster account, and yes its a very good one, why should that matter at all? It comes down to your lack of ability not other peoples.

  • 10.15.2010 11:09 PM PDT

lol

  • 10.16.2010 8:07 AM PDT

657 MLG 50s.


Posted by: OGM RECONNN
how many times are you going to prove your idiocy? my 36/40 mlg level is silver, and my level 30 is account locked, maybe not 100% locked but VERY well locked, and theres -blam!- loads of derankers in it.



Rank lock doesnt exsist, you're just bad. I've gotten numberous accounts to 50s that had well over 6k experience on them. Granted it takes a crap load of work but it's possible.

  • 10.16.2010 11:23 AM PDT

I'm going to have to go with you on this one. I was going for the Lightswitch acheivement and almost every match I was in there was atleast 1 or 2 derankers, some matches even had someone turn around and teamkill and run to the enemy to kill them. Halo 3 still has a ton of derankers, and those who haven't seen that there are have not tried looking or has not had any on their team. Lucky them...

[Edited on 10.16.2010 2:23 PM PDT]

  • 10.16.2010 2:22 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Meagss
  • user homepage:

I play games for gameplay, not silly gimmicks

H3 MM warrior

Reach S7, 8 and 9 arena warrior.

H4 MM legend


Posted by: Damon2244
I'm going to have to go with you on this one. I was going for the Lightswitch acheivement and almost every match I was in there was atleast 1 or 2 derankers, some matches even had someone turn around and teamkill and run to the enemy to kill them. Halo 3 still has a ton of derankers, and those who haven't seen that there are have not tried looking or has not had any on their team. Lucky them...


If you play 50 high there are no derankers

  • 10.16.2010 10:04 PM PDT

657 MLG 50s.


Posted by: meagsIZbeast

Posted by: Damon2244
I'm going to have to go with you on this one. I was going for the Lightswitch acheivement and almost every match I was in there was atleast 1 or 2 derankers, some matches even had someone turn around and teamkill and run to the enemy to kill them. Halo 3 still has a ton of derankers, and those who haven't seen that there are have not tried looking or has not had any on their team. Lucky them...


If you play 50 high there are no derankers


In MLG once you hit 40 you dont get any de-rankers. That seems to be the only playlist to. I've had de-rankers at all levels in every playlist except MLG.

  • 10.16.2010 11:52 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Fabled Legendary Member


Posted by: Undead Lunatics
Good thing I dont play Halo 3... Reach... Try it sometime.

  • 10.17.2010 5:13 AM PDT

"Happiness begins where selfishness ends."

John Wooden

3's Multiplayer is better than Reach's.

+ Dual-wielding
+ Better weapons
+ Better reticle with no bloom
+ Larger Map Selection (And it isn't close)
+ Better Matchmaking Ranking System
+ Slightly cheaper (30 Dollars + 17 dollars in map packs vs. 60 dollars)
- Slower Matchmaking Service
- Smaller player base (However, still large enough to find games)

I own both and prefer Halo 3, just as I prefer COD 4 over MW2.

  • 10.17.2010 1:47 PM PDT


Posted by: OGM RECONNN
arguing with you is hopeless. stfu and go ruin someone elses game experience.
...I've never seen such retardation!

  • 10.17.2010 2:42 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2