- Phailyur
- |
- Exalted Member
You should all really stop comparing Reach and 3. Yes, they're both Halo titles from the same company, etc etc, but they're really very different games - as they were MEANT to be.
I'm more of a fan of Halo 3 first off. Not for any gameplay reason or whatever, but because I played it for 3 years and have so many awesome memories. I understand all the arguments from both sides, but many of them are opinionated and narrow-minded. I've played 10,000 matchmaking games on Halo 3, and have played Reach since launch day, and I can honestly say there's nothing wrong with the gameplay of either game. The skill gap on both is fine. Check my stats for both games (keeping in mind Halo 3 is mostly 50 high MLG, and yet still good). I've managed to perform almost identically on both games. As with both games also, with the right settings (i.e MLG/Arena) the better team, in my experience, nearly always wins.
Basically, if you find the gameplay too random, you're not doing it right. I hate the learn to adapt thing, but honestly, it's a COMPLETELY different game, so you DO have to make some changes to succeed as much as you have on another. Stop comparing Reach to 3, and instead, treat it like a brand new game from a brand new company. If Reach were a completely seperate game from the Halo franchise, you'd probably love it.