- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: Walla_Walla
Posted by: Scinfaxi
Halo 1 multiplayer:
No boarding
A Spartan that slides instead of running
Over powered pistol
Poor graphics
Lame jump
Levels that are way too big (sidewinder, boarding action)
Blood gulch, where a sniper is even more fearsome.
People really need to let go of Halo 1. It is a good game, but its not as good as Halo 2.
"but theres no auto aim" - thats because its not online.
"grenade throws were better" - Throwing a grenade across a map was dumb. And pointless
I would be puzzled if Bungie made halo 1 for the 360. Id rather they took the best elements from Halo 1 and Halo 2 and gave us something new for Halo 3.
Lets not live in the past, Lets evolve!!!
-The pistol wasn't overpowered...That is like saying the BR is.
-Who cares about boarding? You can only do it on 'noobs' who get close to you with a vehicle.
-The master chief runs in halo1....you are retarded.
-Halo1 graphics are better than halo2....Except for cut scenes...Halo1 has specualr halo2 doesn't.
-Lame jump (No not really....Atleast EVERYONE could nade jump and not just host.)
-Halo2's maps are bigger than ANY of halo1's.
-Yes there was auto-aim and bungie addmitted they put too much in halo2 so shut up again.<sigh> what are you talking about? You CANT shoot from across of coag. with the BR, you COULD with the pistol!
-I like being able to board, it makes the game deeper.
-Of course the Master Cheif runs in Halo1, but it kinda looks like hes sliding, as apposed to halo2 where EVERYONE looks like they are running. Sorry, but halo2 has ALOT better graphics.
-By "lame jumps" he means you cant jump higher. Again, sorry, but halo2 jump IS alot better. He WASNT talking about nade jumping so dont put words in his mouth, you know what he ment!
-I would say Halo1 and halo2 BOTH have around the same size maps, so I think you BOTH lose on that one.
-And of course Bungie admitted to put auto aim in the game, because like the other guy said, THEY PUT IT IN THERE BECAUSE OF ONLINE PLAY!!!
[Edited on 10/26/2005]