- Bungie2
- |
- Intrepid Mythic Member
We believe that the universe is unbounded: this is not the same as infinite: the 2-D surface of a sphere, wrapped around a 3rd dimension, has a finite size, but has no end. If you start off in a given direction on the surface of a sphere, you could return to your start point without having to turn around -- you simply go all the way around. But wouldn't that mean the universe has an escape velocity like the earth?
Posted by: falconslayer93
Posted by: All be it
Posted by: Bungie2
Lol, macroscopic black holes have been produced for nanoseconds within Colliders already. My design of a device designed to brutally attack and rip by manipulating macroscopic black holes into ripping a vortex to 11-D space is safer as Hawking radiation means that as soon as the ship enters, the black hole would implode on itself and disappear. Then again, lets go into the radiative theorems and such required.
The technology to develop macroscopic black-holes efficiently would take a LONG time to develop. The math that can determine the energy and precision required to manipulate black holes can be done within 20-30 years if fully funded.
~B2
no one has made macroscopic black holes. check your Latin. a black whole the size of a softball would slowly destroy the earth.
Also you assume a black whole could be used for transporting ships and persons unharmed. You think we will get around the fact that they tear matter apart on an atomic, possibly subatomic level, and compress it impossibly small.
Posted by: All be it
Posted by: Bungie2
Lol, macroscopic black holes have been produced for nanoseconds within Colliders already. My design of a device designed to brutally attack and rip by manipulating macroscopic black holes into ripping a vortex to 11-D space is safer as Hawking radiation means that as soon as the ship enters, the black hole would implode on itself and disappear. Then again, lets go into the radiative theorems and such required.
The technology to develop macroscopic black-holes efficiently would take a LONG time to develop. The math that can determine the energy and precision required to manipulate black holes can be done within 20-30 years if fully funded.
~B2
no one has made macroscopic black holes. check your Latin. a black whole the size of a softball would slowly destroy the earth.
Also you assume a black whole could be used for transporting ships and persons unharmed. You think we will get around the fact that they tear matter apart on an atomic, possibly subatomic level, and compress it impossibly small.
Microscopic black holes were already made in the Hadron Collider, or if they haven't done it yet then they will. And if you read his posts correctly then you'd know that Hawking Radiation would dissipate it very, very quickly
Thank you for replying for me. It seems art least someone can read my answer correctly after all :P.Also, the threshold for a Black-hole to engulf the earth would have to be much larger for Hawking radiation to have minimal enough effects to attack the planet. Hawking radiation dissipates the Black hole immediately, and the smaller the hole beyond the threshold, the larger the radiation until boom, it collapses and explodes. Did I mention the radiation makes the Black Hole glow, especially at that small size? As an example, a black hole the size of Mt Everest would be bright as a color on the visible spectrum. So losing the hole would not be an issue, not that the black hole should be the size of a mountain, because thats far too large to be feasible in my equations.
~B2.