Bungie Universe
This topic has moved here: Poll [22 votes]: Do wou Think That halo 3 And Reach Were Overrated?
  • Poll [22 votes]: Do wou Think That halo 3 And Reach Were Overrated?
Subject: Do wou Think That halo 3 And Reach Were Overrated?

KILL OR BE KILLED!

Poll: Do wou Think That halo 3 And Reach Were Overrated?  [closed]
Yes:  32%
(7 Votes)
No:  68%
(15 Votes)
Total Votes: 22

i hav 2 say yes but that doesnt mean that they suck

  • 01.28.2011 10:23 PM PDT
  • gamertag: An0nz
  • user homepage:

CoD is a good game, even if the Halo series are better in some aspects. Anyone who insults either is just bad in that game. Grow up.

Yes and no. Halo 3 deserved some of its shine, but the lack of successful innovation and decrease in motivation makes Reach too overrated.

  • 01.29.2011 12:13 AM PDT

RIP Ginger

Spring 1997 - 6 January 2012

No game can live up to all the hype, but at least some of it. Personally I think that there is a quite a lot of innovation in Reach, with the entirely new engine, Forge World, and all the options which this provides. Btw, Assassinations.

  • 01.29.2011 1:26 AM PDT

To me Halo 3 is the biggest dissapointment in the series, and yes: I do think it is overrated by this community.

Lets be honest: everything Reach offers should have been in Halo 3 already.
Halo CE set the new bar for shooters and was a generation ahead of the competition.
Then 2004 came...competition was finally on par with Halo CE and Bungie just drops another shooter that was WAY ahead of the competition: Halo 2.
Halo is de shooter that is genre defining and sets bars that other developers can't touch for years.
Then 2007: Halo 3 comes out and suddenly Halo starts feeling stale. No longer the huge progression the first two games had. Halo is no longer miles ahead of the competition but "just" one of the topshooters.
Campaign is lackluster compared to what Halo 2 set up to. Multiplayer is good, but by far not as great as the one in Halo 2. Mapdesign is very weak, starts to show Bungies decline in ability to come up with great maps as in Halo 2.

But somehow...people think Halo 3 is the best Halo in the series. So yes, I think its overrated.

Reach is a different story.
I'd say its greatly underrated by the haters, and the people who defend it very fanatically might intentionally overrate it just to compensate for all the hating.
I personally think Reach is a lot better than Halo 3, but not close to being as epic as the first too tho.

So in short:
Halo 3: overrated, its actually the weakest link in the series
Reach: in dubio, both over and underrated: its just a good Halo

  • 01.29.2011 1:53 AM PDT

I'm 23, I have a house, dog, girlfriend, job and I have no interest in any fanboyism so if you're thinking about sending me a childish PM, don't be surprised when I don't call back.


Posted by: DonVinzone1
To me Halo 3 is the biggest dissapointment in the series, and yes: I do think it is overrated by this community.

Lets be honest: everything Reach offers should have been in Halo 3 already.
Halo CE set the new bar for shooters and was a generation ahead of the competition.
Then 2004 came...competition was finally on par with Halo CE and Bungie just drops another shooter that was WAY ahead of the competition: Halo 2.
Halo is de shooter that is genre defining and sets bars that other developers can't touch for years.
Then 2007: Halo 3 comes out and suddenly Halo starts feeling stale. No longer the huge progression the first two games had. Halo is no longer miles ahead of the competition but "just" one of the topshooters.
Campaign is lackluster compared to what Halo 2 set up to. Multiplayer is good, but by far not as great as the one in Halo 2. Mapdesign is very weak, starts to show Bungies decline in ability to come up with great maps as in Halo 2.

But somehow...people think Halo 3 is the best Halo in the series. So yes, I think its overrated.

Reach is a different story.
I'd say its greatly underrated by the haters, and the people who defend it very fanatically might intentionally overrate it just to compensate for all the hating.
I personally think Reach is a lot better than Halo 3, but not close to being as epic as the first too tho.

So in short:
Halo 3: overrated, its actually the weakest link in the series
Reach: in dubio, both over and underrated: its just a good Halo


Agreed completely.

  • 01.29.2011 2:11 AM PDT

I am a practicing traditional Catholic.

I'd say both of them entirely deserved as much praise as they got.

  • 01.29.2011 5:20 AM PDT

It depends on who you ask, a fanboy would overrate it while the Reach forum would seriously underrate it. While it may not be the best game ever, it was still a lot of fun.

  • 01.29.2011 8:07 AM PDT

Dark Neptune, a young amateur astronomer whose gaming life is no different from other teenagers of his age, though he controls it more strictly then others.


Posted by: DonVinzone1
To me Halo 3 is the biggest dissapointment in the series, and yes: I do think it is overrated by this community.

Lets be honest: everything Reach offers should have been in Halo 3 already.
Halo CE set the new bar for shooters and was a generation ahead of the competition.
Then 2004 came...competition was finally on par with Halo CE and Bungie just drops another shooter that was WAY ahead of the competition: Halo 2.
Halo is de shooter that is genre defining and sets bars that other developers can't touch for years.
Then 2007: Halo 3 comes out and suddenly Halo starts feeling stale. No longer the huge progression the first two games had. Halo is no longer miles ahead of the competition but "just" one of the topshooters.
Campaign is lackluster compared to what Halo 2 set up to. Multiplayer is good, but by far not as great as the one in Halo 2. Mapdesign is very weak, starts to show Bungies decline in ability to come up with great maps as in Halo 2.

But somehow...people think Halo 3 is the best Halo in the series. So yes, I think its overrated.

Reach is a different story.
I'd say its greatly underrated by the haters, and the people who defend it very fanatically might intentionally overrate it just to compensate for all the hating.
I personally think Reach is a lot better than Halo 3, but not close to being as epic as the first too tho.

So in short:
Halo 3: overrated, its actually the weakest link in the series
Reach: in dubio, both over and underrated: its just a good Halo


Not really. Halo 3's Campaign had it's own awesomeness. First Shooter game I know that features so much Vehicle A.I.s in a mission, The Covenant. 2 Scarabs + Scorpion + Mongoose + Warthog + Hornets + Banshees + Prowler + Ghost.

God Reach had better capacities to be as epic as that, but somehow somewhere Bungie screwed their hype up.

Reach had the most A.I.s in any Halo game, but just 2 notable parts;

*LNoS. Space Mission. 20+ Banshees, 5 Seraphs, 3 Sabres + Anchor 9 defenses. Talk about vehicular A.I.s being 20 at the max.

*TPoA. The part where Captain Keyes first makes his truimphant voice-over return, or more specifically, the beginning part of the map, Boneyard. 20 Covies, 6 Marines and Emile. 27 A.I.s. That's the highest. Like seriously? I thought Bungie kept hyping the game up that there could be 40 A.I.s.

I mean WTF man, Firefight could take like 28 enemies at the max, 24 from standard Squads (e.g. Elite Patrol, Skirmishers, etc.) and another 4 more from Drop Pod Brutes/Elites/Grunts.

Wow man. Disappointment.

  • 01.29.2011 8:14 AM PDT

Vengeance only leads to an ongoing cycle of hatred.

Halo 3...hell no!

Halo: Reach...a bit, yes.

  • 01.29.2011 8:17 AM PDT