- OrderedComa
- |
- Noble Member
Posted by: privet caboose
Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron
Posted by: GrnDragn
Posted by: privet caboose
Posted by: Duardo
The games always take priority over books, so the books need to be rewritten, not the games.
The books were just rewritten less than six months ago, mind you. This was 343's biggest failure, as well as Bungies. Probably just a lack of communication, but for those who bought the rewrites it would be a complete and total ripoff if MORE rewrites came out.
Yes, it would be a fail, however the failure was on Bungie's part for not even trying to make Reach fit with the books in the first place. I have never seen Bungie pull the "games>books" card. They always triad to maje everything fit, but now they've changed, for the worst IMHO.
For many avid readers of the books, Halo: Reach was Bungie's giant middle finger to the Halo lore and the fans of said lore themselves.
The failure is on your part for not noticing how they did make the game fit with the books.
The Journal for example, written by the AUTHOR of the Fall of Reach.
Have you even read the journal? It clears up a few issues, but not everything. There are still many unfixable errors Reach caused.
That statement is rather narrow-minded, I expected a little better of you Caboose by this point. I can't say whether there are errors left unfixed because I haven't gotten my hands on a copy of the Journal yet, but to claim that any of the "errors" in Halo: Reach are unfixable is really dumb. Any of them can easily be "fixed", there is a vast difference between "hasn't been fixed yet" and "utterly unfixable". Given enough time all these so called "errors" will be fixed, or don't need fixing in Bungie and 343's view, in which case people need to suck it up and move on :P