- Mike Huntt
- |
- Exalted Legendary Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Posted by: x Foman123 x
Posted by: jaythenerdkid
I definitely believe every wildly inflated claim ITT.
Weow kid, do you even lift?
Skype: au-simon
Posted by: BR131
Posted by: Legacyy
Making a colonel almost go -200.Not 100% of colonels are that bad. 99% of us are though."Bad" is subjective.
You're good to a legit level 20, but bad to a legit level 50.
I've only ever played one good Colonel. He was better than any 50 I've ever played with. I can't even remember his GT, but I played him in an Aussie MLG Custom. He went +45 on all MLG 50s.
I assumed it was just his original account, but he was an MLG 50 on another account. Everyone I talked to had never heard of him, he didn't have known people on his list and no one recognised his voice.
It was a real surprise because he was consistently good. Every game he would go +20 or +30.
Anyway, what I'm saying is, while "bad" is subjective.. Colonels are usually "bad" compared to 50s, but every now and then, one comes out that is far better than what his/her rank suggests.