- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
I for one think this vs is hilarious. Especially those who claim Halo is
more realistic in all areas. Those who make that claim in all seriousness simply make me giggle like a madman.
Now since the OP is severely lacking in details, I'm going to assume he means all the Call of duty series and what that intails.
20 bog standard marines with their choice of weapons as well as jugger armour. Now compared to the OP's Halo forces, the CoD forces seems a little lack luster. I mean come on what does CoD weapons have on Halo weapons?
Well Iron Sights for one, which means they are not forced to only Hollywood hip fire like a majority of Halo weapons do. Second, they have access to a wide range of heavy Machine guns and Missiles, as well as some heavy sniper rifles(one of which is actually an AT rifle). Last but not least, they use tanks that were designed by people who actually know what they are doing,
Really all the CoD force really has to do is camp in a relativly secure area, and use .50 caliber MGs on anything that comes within range, which mind you is greater than 95% of halo weapons.
All in all it's a actually fair fight, the incompetent Halo with future armour/shields but -blam!-ier guns vs the competent CoD with -blam!-ier armour, but better guns.
Now if it was Twenty Characters from the Halo seiries with access to their hand held weapons (no vehicles) and demonstrated Abilities vs Twenty CoD Characters with their weapons and demonstrated abilities; this would be an interesting fight.
One side with super soldiers, aliens, and Future Tech vs Another side with impossible badasses, Crazy Awesome Killers, and -blam!-/Soviet Super Science....
I think I will need more popcorn....and posssibly a change of pants.
[Edited on 03.09.2011 9:42 AM PST]