Halo 3 Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: I'm happy Halo 3 is failing!
  • Subject: I'm happy Halo 3 is failing!
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4
Subject: I'm happy Halo 3 is failing!
  • gamertag: Meagss
  • user homepage:

I play games for gameplay, not silly gimmicks

H3 MM warrior

Reach S7, 8 and 9 arena warrior.

H4 MM legend

This thread is retarded.

Im gona clear some things up here, first reach is the inferior game. This is supported by the huge population decrease from H3 to reach at similar times on the timeline. Even if you attribute this to other games that are out now (which is irrelevant because H3 had just as much competition) there is no way that, that can be the sole reason for the dramatic population decrease.

With that in mind Reach will not be going any where any time soon. MLGs first event is starting soon and there are pros in full support of reach.

However H3 is still keeping up with reach, in that it is still top 10 in online MP games. H3 will likely not be going any where within the next few months. Chances are it will last for about a year, until the next game in the series is released.

and in case someone wants to make more excuses for the population of reach think about this. The overall population of XBL has multiplied in the past few years, now that means at H3s peak there were less people that actually had XBL, and yet there was still many many time the amount of people playing it tan there are playing reach at similar times on the timeline.

  • 03.11.2011 12:45 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: meagsIZbeast
The overall population of XBL has multiplied in the past few years, now that means at H3s peak there were less people that actually had XBL, and yet there was still many many time the amount of people playing it tan there are playing reach at similar times on the timeline.


The only time you see Halo 3 having a higher population compared to Reach is when you take Reach's population during a weekday when people are at work and/or school and then taking Halo 3's population counter during a weekend/holiday or when a DLC map pack had just arrived.

I can see 200k people online at Reach every weekend even months after it's release and the only time Halo 3 ever had that amount of people was when everyone was on a holiday or because of a DLC's arrival.

And not to mention Reach has more competition than Halo 3 did at the time.

  • 03.11.2011 2:23 PM PDT

Nopeurbad.

You're full of yourself. Get a 50.

Was at one point, in the Top .87% in Competitive for reach. Then I quit.


Posted by: manwith
Posted by: meagsIZbeast
The overall population of XBL has multiplied in the past few years, now that means at H3s peak there were less people that actually had XBL, and yet there was still many many time the amount of people playing it tan there are playing reach at similar times on the timeline.


The only time you see Halo 3 having a higher population compared to Reach is when you take Reach's population during a weekday when people are at work and/or school and then taking Halo 3's population counter during a weekend/holiday or when a DLC map pack had just arrived.

I can see 200k people online at Reach every weekend even months after it's release and the only time Halo 3 ever had that amount of people was when everyone was on a holiday or because of a DLC's arrival.

And not to mention Reach has more competition than Halo 3 did at the time.


Im guessing you never played H3 at its peak. You're bad at halo.

  • 03.11.2011 2:35 PM PDT

Why would somebody be a fanboy of this game i mean come on... huge host advantage, heaps of useless weapons,overpowered vehicles and alot of terrible maps... yet still better then Reach who would have guessed

  • 03.11.2011 2:49 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Meagss
  • user homepage:

I play games for gameplay, not silly gimmicks

H3 MM warrior

Reach S7, 8 and 9 arena warrior.

H4 MM legend

Posted by: manwith
Posted by: meagsIZbeast
The overall population of XBL has multiplied in the past few years, now that means at H3s peak there were less people that actually had XBL, and yet there was still many many time the amount of people playing it tan there are playing reach at similar times on the timeline.


The only time you see Halo 3 having a higher population compared to Reach is when you take Reach's population during a weekday when people are at work and/or school and then taking Halo 3's population counter during a weekend/holiday or when a DLC map pack had just arrived.

I can see 200k people online at Reach every weekend even months after it's release and the only time Halo 3 ever had that amount of people was when everyone was on a holiday or because of a DLC's arrival.

And not to mention Reach has more competition than Halo 3 did at the time.


First Reach does not have any more competition than H3 did.

Second Social Slayer in H3 had over 200,000 people in it alone. There was literally more than double reachs population at H3s peak. Anyone who played H3 and watched its population would know that

Also dont try to pull the 24 hr thing, H3 was just recently changed to have a 24 hr population.

  • 03.11.2011 3:00 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: meagsIZbeast
Posted by: manwith
Posted by: meagsIZbeast
The overall population of XBL has multiplied in the past few years, now that means at H3s peak there were less people that actually had XBL, and yet there was still many many time the amount of people playing it tan there are playing reach at similar times on the timeline.


The only time you see Halo 3 having a higher population compared to Reach is when you take Reach's population during a weekday when people are at work and/or school and then taking Halo 3's population counter during a weekend/holiday or when a DLC map pack had just arrived.

I can see 200k people online at Reach every weekend even months after it's release and the only time Halo 3 ever had that amount of people was when everyone was on a holiday or because of a DLC's arrival.

And not to mention Reach has more competition than Halo 3 did at the time.


First Reach does not have any more competition than H3 did.

Second Social Slayer in H3 had over 200,000 people in it alone. There was literally more than double reachs population at H3s peak. Anyone who played H3 and watched its population would know that

Also dont try to pull the 24 hr thing, H3 was just recently changed to have a 24 hr population.


I played Halo 3 during at it's peak and I never once noticed months after it's release it having more than 200k people online, unless it was a holiday or a DLC had arrived.

You can be certain that at no point was I using the 24 hour thing.

[Edited on 03.11.2011 3:12 PM PST]

  • 03.11.2011 3:09 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Meagss
  • user homepage:

I play games for gameplay, not silly gimmicks

H3 MM warrior

Reach S7, 8 and 9 arena warrior.

H4 MM legend

Posted by: manwith
Posted by: meagsIZbeast
Posted by: manwith
Posted by: meagsIZbeast
The overall population of XBL has multiplied in the past few years, now that means at H3s peak there were less people that actually had XBL, and yet there was still many many time the amount of people playing it tan there are playing reach at similar times on the timeline.


The only time you see Halo 3 having a higher population compared to Reach is when you take Reach's population during a weekday when people are at work and/or school and then taking Halo 3's population counter during a weekend/holiday or when a DLC map pack had just arrived.

I can see 200k people online at Reach every weekend even months after it's release and the only time Halo 3 ever had that amount of people was when everyone was on a holiday or because of a DLC's arrival.

And not to mention Reach has more competition than Halo 3 did at the time.


First Reach does not have any more competition than H3 did.

Second Social Slayer in H3 had over 200,000 people in it alone. There was literally more than double reachs population at H3s peak. Anyone who played H3 and watched its population would know that

Also dont try to pull the 24 hr thing, H3 was just recently changed to have a 24 hr population.


I played Halo 3 during at it's peak and I never once noticed months after it's release it having more that 200k people online, unless it was a holiday or a DLC had arrived.

You can be certain that at no point was I using the 24 hour thing.


what?

idk what you were looking at but SS alone could have 200,000 people alone.... Something tells me you werent playing much attention

  • 03.11.2011 3:11 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: meagsIZbeast
Posted by: manwith
Posted by: meagsIZbeast
Posted by: manwith
Posted by: meagsIZbeast
The overall population of XBL has multiplied in the past few years, now that means at H3s peak there were less people that actually had XBL, and yet there was still many many time the amount of people playing it tan there are playing reach at similar times on the timeline.


The only time you see Halo 3 having a higher population compared to Reach is when you take Reach's population during a weekday when people are at work and/or school and then taking Halo 3's population counter during a weekend/holiday or when a DLC map pack had just arrived.

I can see 200k people online at Reach every weekend even months after it's release and the only time Halo 3 ever had that amount of people was when everyone was on a holiday or because of a DLC's arrival.

And not to mention Reach has more competition than Halo 3 did at the time.


First Reach does not have any more competition than H3 did.

Second Social Slayer in H3 had over 200,000 people in it alone. There was literally more than double reachs population at H3s peak. Anyone who played H3 and watched its population would know that

Also dont try to pull the 24 hr thing, H3 was just recently changed to have a 24 hr population.


I played Halo 3 during at it's peak and I never once noticed months after it's release it having more that 200k people online, unless it was a holiday or a DLC had arrived.

You can be certain that at no point was I using the 24 hour thing.


what?

idk what you were looking at but SS alone could have 200,000 people alone.... Something tells me you werent playing much attention


Social Slayer was always around 50,000-100,000 people at highest. If I'm wrong there's better be some proof, pal.

  • 03.11.2011 3:15 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Meagss
  • user homepage:

I play games for gameplay, not silly gimmicks

H3 MM warrior

Reach S7, 8 and 9 arena warrior.

H4 MM legend

The proof is that you clearly werent playing at peak times. At any rate I know im right so your opinion really doesnt matter to me at all.

  • 03.11.2011 3:18 PM PDT

Add me if you're a serious MLG player.

Halo 3 is doing fine. I can get games 50-high in any playlist within a few minutes.

  • 03.11.2011 4:21 PM PDT

Yes, I AM just that awesome.

Posted by: SinghCPA85
I have this really good feeling inside as I see Halo 3's population dwindle.

You Mad Halo 3 Fanboys?


I sense a Reach fanboy.

Get coup so you can be marked as a troll.

  • 03.11.2011 4:47 PM PDT

Yes, I AM just that awesome.

UNSUCCESSFUL TROLL IS





























UNSUCCESSFUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!








Reach was the WORST Halo, it COMPLETELY took out the "Oh, look, an alien, this one could be a team-mate." that all the other Halos had.

Reach is

"Oh, look, an alien, since this is Reach I can just shoot it."

  • 03.11.2011 5:01 PM PDT

"Do you smell that son"
"No Captain, What is it"
"Napalm Son, I love the smell of Napalm in the morning"

Posted by: manwith

I played Halo 3 during at it's peak and I never once noticed months after it's release it having more than 200k people online, unless it was a holiday or a DLC had arrived.

You can be certain that at no point was I using the 24 hour thing.


Lies, Social playlists alone had over 400,000 people playing during the week (mon - thurs) over 650,000 were active from 3008 - jan/feb 2010.

Personally i seen, now the most i ever seen on line at any one time, was 1,200,000 this was in august 08.

Most ever in SS was 340,000 so SS alone had more population that reach total, and that was a year after release, reach is lucky to break 100,000 on a fri and sat night six months after release!

Do the math dumbass

  • 03.11.2011 5:05 PM PDT

Haha, completely agree. the gameplay is extremely dull and boring. and it feels soooo slooooow!

  • 03.11.2011 6:07 PM PDT

Posted by: BouncedMr happy
Reach was the WORST Halo, it COMPLETELY took out the "Oh, look, an alien, this one could be a team-mate." that all the other Halos had.

Reach is

"Oh, look, an alien, since this is Reach I can just shoot it."

Yeah no -blam!-, dumbass. Reach takes place before the events of Halo 2, so the Covenant species (i.e: The Elites) aren't your allies yet.

  • 03.11.2011 6:47 PM PDT

Posted by: Textually Harass
Posted by: ShieldyPoo
U Mirin?

Why don't you do any work on your chest or legs or something? You look like a cartoon character.

Even last summer Halo 3 consistently had 200k+ people playing it during nights. Reach barely has that now, just a few months after release.

If you can't see that Reach's population is laughably bad, then you obviously did not ever play Halo 3.

  • 03.11.2011 6:52 PM PDT

do you made a bungie acount just for this, are you happy dick fanboy?

  • 03.11.2011 7:03 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Ekisra
  • user homepage:

A language spoken with no words

Reachtard, best new word EVAR!

  • 03.11.2011 10:28 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: ShieldyPoo
Even last summer Halo 3 consistently had 200k+ people playing it during nights. Reach barely has that now, just a few months after release.

If you can't see that Reach's population is laughably bad, then you obviously did not ever play Halo 3.


Wow, I am surprised, Halo 3 had higher numbers DURING SUMMER NIGHTS. OMG, OMG, Reach is obviously doing bad not getting those numbers in the middle of work/school days. Something is horribly wrong.

[Edited on 03.12.2011 2:51 AM PST]

  • 03.12.2011 2:51 AM PDT

░▓░░░▓░░▓▓▓░░▓░░░░░░▓▓▓░░░░░░▓▓▓▓░░
░▓░░░▓░▓░░░▓░▓░░░░░▓░░░▓░░░░░░░░░▓░
░▓▓▓▓▓░▓▓▓▓▓░▓░░░░░▓░░░▓░░░░░▓▓▓▓░░
░▓░░░▓░▓░░░▓░▓░░░░░▓░░░▓░░░░░░░░░▓░
░▓░░░▓░▓░░░▓░▓▓▓▓▓░░▓▓▓░░░░░░▓▓▓▓░░

Posted by: manwith
Posted by: ShieldyPoo
Even last summer Halo 3 consistently had 200k+ people playing it during nights. Reach barely has that now, just a few months after release.

If you can't see that Reach's population is laughably bad, then you obviously did not ever play Halo 3.


Wow, I am surprised, Halo 3 had higher numbers DURING SUMMER NIGHTS. OMG, OMG, Reach is obviously doing bad not getting those numbers in the middle of work/school days. Something is horribly wrong.


Retard alert.

  • 03.12.2011 3:22 AM PDT

If you read this I command you to buy Skyrim.


Posted by: SinghCPA85
I have this really good feeling inside as I see Halo 3's population dwindle.

You Mad Halo 3 Fanboys?




GTFO you ps3 fanboy

  • 03.12.2011 3:30 AM PDT

Main Account: Nemesis Inf3rno (50)
Main Account = Perm Banned (Thanks Microsoft >.<)
http://www.youtube.com/ClanNemesisH3
http://www.youtube.com/NemesisBoosts50s
Likes: MLG, TD, HLG, Sigz
My Sigz? - GT: A Crafty Koala
TD 50 - TS 50 - TSW 50 - LW 42 - TSN 42 - MLG 29

Posted by: st3ven9640
Posted by: manwith
Posted by: ShieldyPoo
Even last summer Halo 3 consistently had 200k+ people playing it during nights. Reach barely has that now, just a few months after release.

If you can't see that Reach's population is laughably bad, then you obviously did not ever play Halo 3.


Wow, I am surprised, Halo 3 had higher numbers DURING SUMMER NIGHTS. OMG, OMG, Reach is obviously doing bad not getting those numbers in the middle of work/school days. Something is horribly wrong.


Retard alert.

  • 03.12.2011 9:04 AM PDT

If you can still find a match then there should be no problem.

Population doesn't matter.

  • 03.12.2011 9:28 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4