Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Who would win a space battle, Star Wars or Halo?
  • Subject: Who would win a space battle, Star Wars or Halo?
Subject: Who would win a space battle, Star Wars or Halo?

Although the UNSC/Covenant has better tactics (which could be debatable), I still think that the Empire/Republic/Rebels/CIS would win due to sheer numbers.

  • 03.07.2011 3:44 PM PDT

A standard Turbo-laser on any Empire ship is 4 times stronger than a Shipboard MAC, Add to the fact that they have multiple turbo-lasers all around the ship. It has a firing rate of 60 blasts a minute, one slug every second, with dozens at the same time.

I hardly believe any Covenant ship can survive even 2 seconds of a blast from any standard Star Wars cruiser with turbo-lasers.

Case Closed, No Covenant weaponry can crack the shields of any Empire ship, it would take 2 Slug from a SMAC station which is 9X times stronger than a Shipboard MAC to just break the shields, even if there was a second between the two shots it would regain enough power to block the second shot.

No Covenant weaponry can match a SMAC, not even an Energy projector. Prove me wrong Halo fans.

  • 03.07.2011 3:56 PM PDT

"I may not be perfect, but always been true."

Posted by: mojeda101
A standard Turbo-laser on any Empire ship is 4 times stronger than a Shipboard MAC, Add to the fact that they have multiple turbo-lasers all around the ship. It has a firing rate of 60 blasts a minute, one slug every second, with dozens at the same time.

I hardly believe any Covenant ship can survive even 2 seconds of a blast from any standard Star Wars cruiser with turbo-lasers.

Case Closed, No Covenant weaponry can crack the shields of any Empire ship, it would take 2 Slug from a SMAC station which is 9X times stronger than a Shipboard MAC to just break the shields, even if there was a second between the two shots it would regain enough power to block the second shot.

No Covenant weaponry can match a SMAC, not even an Energy projector. Prove me wrong Halo fans.


A direct hit from an Energy Projector to the bridge of a Wars ship would screw them over, seeing how a Y, X or A wing crashed on one and completely destroyed it.

and with said Energy Projector, Covenant ships can "snipe" other ships from a safe distance.

  • 03.07.2011 4:00 PM PDT

Posted by: RKOSNAKE
Posted by: mojeda101
A standard Turbo-laser on any Empire ship is 4 times stronger than a Shipboard MAC, Add to the fact that they have multiple turbo-lasers all around the ship. It has a firing rate of 60 blasts a minute, one slug every second, with dozens at the same time.

I hardly believe any Covenant ship can survive even 2 seconds of a blast from any standard Star Wars cruiser with turbo-lasers.

Case Closed, No Covenant weaponry can crack the shields of any Empire ship, it would take 2 Slug from a SMAC station which is 9X times stronger than a Shipboard MAC to just break the shields, even if there was a second between the two shots it would regain enough power to block the second shot.

No Covenant weaponry can match a SMAC, not even an Energy projector. Prove me wrong Halo fans.


A direct hit from an Energy Projector to the bridge of a Wars ship would screw them over, seeing how a Y, X or A wing crashed on one and completely destroyed it.

and with said Energy Projector, Covenant ships can "snipe" other ships from a safe distance.


Do you honestly think the Empire would let them be that close? They would be blown to bits before they got within a thousand miles. To that Y, X, and A wing thing, that single Super Star Destroyer was taking firing from EVERY Rebellion ship, it's shields were down, once the shields are down the Empire is a piece of cake to take down but you must crack it.

It took the rebellion at least 15 minutes to crack it's shields with the dozens of ships they had, once they were down, it was game over. But looking at Covenant weaponry, it wouldn't even bring them down to 98%.

  • 03.07.2011 4:03 PM PDT

"I may not be perfect, but always been true."

Posted by: mojeda101
Posted by: RKOSNAKE
Posted by: mojeda101
A standard Turbo-laser on any Empire ship is 4 times stronger than a Shipboard MAC, Add to the fact that they have multiple turbo-lasers all around the ship. It has a firing rate of 60 blasts a minute, one slug every second, with dozens at the same time.

I hardly believe any Covenant ship can survive even 2 seconds of a blast from any standard Star Wars cruiser with turbo-lasers.

Case Closed, No Covenant weaponry can crack the shields of any Empire ship, it would take 2 Slug from a SMAC station which is 9X times stronger than a Shipboard MAC to just break the shields, even if there was a second between the two shots it would regain enough power to block the second shot.

No Covenant weaponry can match a SMAC, not even an Energy projector. Prove me wrong Halo fans.


A direct hit from an Energy Projector to the bridge of a Wars ship would screw them over, seeing how a Y, X or A wing crashed on one and completely destroyed it.

and with said Energy Projector, Covenant ships can "snipe" other ships from a safe distance.


Do you honestly think the Empire would let them be that close? They would be blown to bits before they got within a thousand miles. To that Y, X, and A wing thing, that single Super Star Destroyer was taking firing from EVERY Rebellion ship, it's shields were down, once the shields are down the Empire is a piece of cake to take down but you must crack it.

It took the rebellion at least 15 minutes to crack it's shields with the dozens of ships they had, once they were down, it was game over. But looking at Covenant weaponry, it wouldn't even bring them down to 98%.


I don't know why you say the shields of Imperial ships are so good, I mean their shield generators were basically an obvious target to enemy fire as they sat on top of the command tower and they were especially vulnerable to missiles and suicide impacts. I don't think an Elite in a Banshee would mind suiciding if it meant he/she could take out the shields.

  • 03.07.2011 4:14 PM PDT

Posted by: RKOSNAKE
Posted by: mojeda101
Posted by: RKOSNAKE
Posted by: mojeda101
A standard Turbo-laser on any Empire ship is 4 times stronger than a Shipboard MAC, Add to the fact that they have multiple turbo-lasers all around the ship. It has a firing rate of 60 blasts a minute, one slug every second, with dozens at the same time.

I hardly believe any Covenant ship can survive even 2 seconds of a blast from any standard Star Wars cruiser with turbo-lasers.

Case Closed, No Covenant weaponry can crack the shields of any Empire ship, it would take 2 Slug from a SMAC station which is 9X times stronger than a Shipboard MAC to just break the shields, even if there was a second between the two shots it would regain enough power to block the second shot.

No Covenant weaponry can match a SMAC, not even an Energy projector. Prove me wrong Halo fans.


A direct hit from an Energy Projector to the bridge of a Wars ship would screw them over, seeing how a Y, X or A wing crashed on one and completely destroyed it.

and with said Energy Projector, Covenant ships can "snipe" other ships from a safe distance.


Do you honestly think the Empire would let them be that close? They would be blown to bits before they got within a thousand miles. To that Y, X, and A wing thing, that single Super Star Destroyer was taking firing from EVERY Rebellion ship, it's shields were down, once the shields are down the Empire is a piece of cake to take down but you must crack it.

It took the rebellion at least 15 minutes to crack it's shields with the dozens of ships they had, once they were down, it was game over. But looking at Covenant weaponry, it wouldn't even bring them down to 98%.


I don't know why you say the shields of Imperial ships are so good, I mean their shield generators were basically an obvious target to enemy fire as they sat on top of the command tower and they were especially vulnerable to missiles and suicide impacts. I don't think an Elite in a Banshee would mind suiciding if it meant he/she could take out the shields.

Posted by: RKOSNAKE
Posted by: mojeda101
Posted by: RKOSNAKE
Posted by: mojeda101
A standard Turbo-laser on any Empire ship is 4 times stronger than a Shipboard MAC, Add to the fact that they have multiple turbo-lasers all around the ship. It has a firing rate of 60 blasts a minute, one slug every second, with dozens at the same time.

I hardly believe any Covenant ship can survive even 2 seconds of a blast from any standard Star Wars cruiser with turbo-lasers.

Case Closed, No Covenant weaponry can crack the shields of any Empire ship, it would take 2 Slug from a SMAC station which is 9X times stronger than a Shipboard MAC to just break the shields, even if there was a second between the two shots it would regain enough power to block the second shot.

No Covenant weaponry can match a SMAC, not even an Energy projector. Prove me wrong Halo fans.


A direct hit from an Energy Projector to the bridge of a Wars ship would screw them over, seeing how a Y, X or A wing crashed on one and completely destroyed it.

and with said Energy Projector, Covenant ships can "snipe" other ships from a safe distance.


Do you honestly think the Empire would let them be that close? They would be blown to bits before they got within a thousand miles. To that Y, X, and A wing thing, that single Super Star Destroyer was taking firing from EVERY Rebellion ship, it's shields were down, once the shields are down the Empire is a piece of cake to take down but you must crack it.

It took the rebellion at least 15 minutes to crack it's shields with the dozens of ships they had, once they were down, it was game over. But looking at Covenant weaponry, it wouldn't even bring them down to 98%.


I don't know why you say the shields of Imperial ships are so good, I mean their shield generators were basically an obvious target to enemy fire as they sat on top of the command tower and they were especially vulnerable to missiles and suicide impacts. I don't think an Elite in a Banshee would mind suiciding if it meant he/she could take out the shields.


"Sir! We lost the bridge deflector Shield"

"The BRIDGE" Not the whole ship, the Covenant would take a long time for them to find out the weaknesses of the Empire before they could begin taking them out.

  • 03.07.2011 4:50 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Halo definantly.

  • 03.07.2011 4:55 PM PDT


Posted by: Recovery 25

Posted by: ROBERTO jh

Posted by: red alert447

So since both sides is pretty equal, the war will be won only by superior tactics,
The generals with the best tactics will win.


Posted by: ROBERTO jh

Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron
Perhaps, though the topic did devolve into "Precursor and Forerunners, halo wins!"


Its because the OP never have any rules. He merely said the Star Wars universe vs the Halo universe.

Anyway, with UNSC/Covenant vs the Empire/Republic, It'd be a close fight for sure that could really go either way.

UNSC advantages:

1) Hihgly powerful Weapons
2) Nimble ships
3) NOVA and nuclear bombs
4) Slipspace bombing

Disadvantages:

1) No shields.
2) Most ships have an exposed bridge.
3) Primary weapon takes time to charge.
4) Slowest FTL of these 4.

Empire Advantages:

1) A LOT of ships.
2) Covered head to tail in weapons
3) Fastest FTL of these 4
4) Clone Army

Disadvanteges:

1) Not very maneuverable
2) Epically exposed bridge that when hit, the ship usually goes with it.
3) Infinite army of clones can be defeated by a decisive capture of Kamino.
4) When cloaked, cannot get signals back and forth. Are essentially blind.

Covenant Advantages:

1) Most powerful base-line ship weaponry of these 4
2) Extremely maneuverable ships.
3) Perfectly accurate point-defense lasers make fighters nearly useless.
4) Extensively powerful shields.

Disadvanteges

1) For a brief second after dropping from FTL, they're dead in the water
2) Not the most innovative in using technology.
3) TBH, I'm having trouble thinking of two more.

Republic: *see Empire*


It almost always falls to superior tactics. If I asked "who'd win? A race of teddy bears with stick and stones or the strongest legion of troops in a galactic superpower?" You'd say the Empire.

But if you look at it statistically, the UNSC/Covenant have more available to them in terms of tactical capabilities. More maneuvers pulled off more easily, more variety in weaponry and so on.

Also let's not forget the Halo universe is composed of some of the most tactically brilliant minds in science fiction. From Keyes all the way to the Elites.

So if it comes to tactics, which it seems too, then my money's on the UNSC/Covenant


I'm a huge Halo fan and a huge Star Wars fan and just because I can judge how good both sides are my money is still on the Star Wars universe. If you want a good idea at how smart the Star Wars universe's commanders can be then read the rogue squadron series or the wraith squadron series. Plus they are really good books. If the UNSC won against the Star Wars universe I wouldn't be that upset, but I would hate for the Covenant to win just because they're the Covenant and I would hate for the Forerunners to win because in Cryptum it was revealed that they are -blam!-s and -blam!- over humanity.



I've already read those books.
And yeah, we all hate Covenant, but that dosn't stop their tech from beeing highly advanced.

And we still have this [quote]if you look at it statistically, the UNSC/Covenant have more available to them in terms of tactical capabilities. More maneuvers pulled off more easily, more variety in weaponry and so on.[quote]
Halo universe have more manoeuvrable ships, allowing better tactics.

  • 03.07.2011 11:32 PM PDT

Flood's and Universe's Warhammer 40k fanatic and the one who knows much about it.

I also like House Stark and winter, hurr.

When it comes to small fighters star wars wins the fight easily. I know that Slave 1 isnt popular ship that isnt mass produced, but just giving as example what SW reaches in power of small fighters.

Slave 1:

Main guns: 64000 GW (2 kilotons per shot, 480 rpm firing rate onscreen in AOTC for time-averaged power output rather than peak output)

Missiles: 190 megatons (tail-launched missiles; seismic charge mines are roughly 12000 megatons)

Sublight acceleration: 2500G

Operational range: not stated (however, Obi-Wan's starfighter has an operational range of 150,000 light-years, and is probably similar).

Shield heat dissipation: not stated (however, Amidala's personal yacht has shield dissipation of 2 billion GW peak, and is probably similar)

Asteroid destruction: Jango Fett's seismic charges destroy asteroids in a radius of 5-10 km in AOTC.

Reactor power: not stated (however, Amidala's personal yacht has power output of 7 billion GW max, and is probably similar)

Max hyperspace speed: not stated (however, same-day flight from core to galactic outer-rim systems requires speeds in excess of 10 million c)

---

So halo, tell me. Does UNSC, Flood or covenant have any starfighter sized ship, that can be compared to this in power? I highly doubt that any of your fighters fire 190 megaton missiles. Hell, I even doubt that most of the UNSC cruisers archer missile have such strength.

Alone Sun crusher could destroy most important planets of UNSC and covenant. But, sun crusher is super weapon so I guess we will leave out of this.

[Edited on 03.08.2011 4:05 AM PST]

  • 03.08.2011 3:50 AM PDT


Posted by: Schulzy3
Although the UNSC/Covenant has better tactics (which could be debatable), I still think that the Empire/Republic/Rebels/CIS would win due to sheer numbers.


The Covenant thought the same thing most likely. Numbers don't win a battle, tactics do.

A standard Turbo-laser on any Empire ship is 4 times stronger than a Shipboard MAC, Add to the fact that they have multiple turbo-lasers all around the ship. It has a firing rate of 60 blasts a minute, one slug every second, with dozens at the same time.

I hardly believe any Covenant ship can survive even 2 seconds of a blast from any standard Star Wars cruiser with turbo-lasers.

Case Closed, No Covenant weaponry can crack the shields of any Empire ship, it would take 2 Slug from a SMAC station which is 9X times stronger than a Shipboard MAC to just break the shields, even if there was a second between the two shots it would regain enough power to block the second shot.

No Covenant weaponry can match a SMAC, not even an Energy projector. Prove me wrong Halo fans.


Everything about this is wrong

1) the strength of the turbolaser has been considered to be completely debunked by the movies and their superior canon. They are in fact no more powerful then the artillery used on battleships in WWII.

2) A Covenant Assault Carrier's plasma torpedoes vaporized a 3 kilometer in diameter asteroid with one shot. For perspective, it was calculated vaporizing a 20 meter asteroid a little bit quicker would put that kind of power at a terraton of energy, far more powerful then the SMAC, which is something like 56 gigatons.

Thus, a single shot from an Assault Carrier could gut a Star Destroyer, maybe even an SSD, depending on where the shot landed.

Now the Super Carrier is even stronger.

Case in point: Star Wars weapons DO NOT strike with nuclear force!

[Edited on 03.08.2011 5:26 AM PST]

  • 03.08.2011 5:24 AM PDT

Yes I am British, I like tea, I like crumpets, and I am going to kick your ass!

The UNSC uses MAC rounds and has nukes, the Covenant's plama weaponry would burn through any Star Wars ship's shields and hull. Plus Covenant like to board ships, and Elites against Rebels, Stormtroopers, whatever, would completely OWN them in terms of sheer military prowess. Plus, Star Wars infantry don't have personal shields.

  • 03.08.2011 5:54 AM PDT

*Sigh* So because CGI wasn't great back then, it means the weapons are weak as -blam!-? Stardestroyer.net uses the movies as sources as well when calculating the power of ships.

Let's look at Episode 2 and 3. Episode 2, a battery of artillery cause heavy/massive damage to a ship launching. Earlier you see the same type shrug off attacks by gunships with little to no damage.

In Episode three, you see one of those same type of artillery cannons mounted inside of lower launch bay, and destroy a CIS ship in a single hit. You see a heavy turbolaser open fire on a nearby enemy ship and completely destroy the section struck (When the two fighters went through a fireball, moments before the turbolaser fired.) Later in the Invisible hand, it draws alongside a Venator star destroyer, the following broadsides from the deck guns do enough damage to push the Invisible Hand into a dive, which it recovers from barely.

So, based on that I'd say those guns can do a HEFTY amount of damage.

Nothing really to prove a single plasma torpedo could gut an ISD or any of the larger, more heavier armored and armed star destroyers with ease.

(TBH, sometimes it sounds like the "Movies overrides all other things." is being pulled as a line to purposefully degrade the Star Wars side...)

[Edited on 03.08.2011 6:17 AM PST]

  • 03.08.2011 6:09 AM PDT

Posted by: ROBERTO jh

Posted by: Schulzy3
Although the UNSC/Covenant has better tactics (which could be debatable), I still think that the Empire/Republic/Rebels/CIS would win due to sheer numbers.


The Covenant thought the same thing most likely. Numbers don't win a battle, tactics do.

A standard Turbo-laser on any Empire ship is 4 times stronger than a Shipboard MAC, Add to the fact that they have multiple turbo-lasers all around the ship. It has a firing rate of 60 blasts a minute, one slug every second, with dozens at the same time.

I hardly believe any Covenant ship can survive even 2 seconds of a blast from any standard Star Wars cruiser with turbo-lasers.

Case Closed, No Covenant weaponry can crack the shields of any Empire ship, it would take 2 Slug from a SMAC station which is 9X times stronger than a Shipboard MAC to just break the shields, even if there was a second between the two shots it would regain enough power to block the second shot.

No Covenant weaponry can match a SMAC, not even an Energy projector. Prove me wrong Halo fans.


Everything about this is wrong

1) the strength of the turbolaser has been considered to be completely debunked by the movies and their superior canon. They are in fact no more powerful then the artillery used on battleships in WWII.

2) A Covenant Assault Carrier's plasma torpedoes vaporized a 3 kilometer in diameter asteroid with one shot. For perspective, it was calculated vaporizing a 20 meter asteroid a little bit quicker would put that kind of power at a terraton of energy, far more powerful then the SMAC, which is something like 56 gigatons.

Thus, a single shot from an Assault Carrier could gut a Star Destroyer, maybe even an SSD, depending on where the shot landed.

Now the Super Carrier is even stronger.

Case in point: Star Wars weapons DO NOT strike with nuclear force!


Go to Wookiepedia if you wish to learn the numbers. If you say it's not canon, you have no proof. CGI WAS NOT great in the 80's. The reason it does not show the massive damage is becuase the Armor of the ships can match the strength of the damamge it takes. Plasma would not even do anything to a Star Destroyer.

Honestly, I can get you as much facts as you want, The Covenant would go down faster than the insurrectionist would go against the Covenant. You can't deny it. Movies cannot show spectacular ship battles. Watch Episode 3 and notice the mayhem. There is not much of a massive explosions of such because the armor can absorb the rounds.

Covenant ships cannot. You lose.

  • 03.08.2011 7:11 AM PDT


Posted by: mojeda101
Posted by: ROBERTO jh

Posted by: Schulzy3
Although the UNSC/Covenant has better tactics (which could be debatable), I still think that the Empire/Republic/Rebels/CIS would win due to sheer numbers.


The Covenant thought the same thing most likely. Numbers don't win a battle, tactics do.

A standard Turbo-laser on any Empire ship is 4 times stronger than a Shipboard MAC, Add to the fact that they have multiple turbo-lasers all around the ship. It has a firing rate of 60 blasts a minute, one slug every second, with dozens at the same time.

I hardly believe any Covenant ship can survive even 2 seconds of a blast from any standard Star Wars cruiser with turbo-lasers.

Case Closed, No Covenant weaponry can crack the shields of any Empire ship, it would take 2 Slug from a SMAC station which is 9X times stronger than a Shipboard MAC to just break the shields, even if there was a second between the two shots it would regain enough power to block the second shot.

No Covenant weaponry can match a SMAC, not even an Energy projector. Prove me wrong Halo fans.


Everything about this is wrong

1) the strength of the turbolaser has been considered to be completely debunked by the movies and their superior canon. They are in fact no more powerful then the artillery used on battleships in WWII.

2) A Covenant Assault Carrier's plasma torpedoes vaporized a 3 kilometer in diameter asteroid with one shot. For perspective, it was calculated vaporizing a 20 meter asteroid a little bit quicker would put that kind of power at a terraton of energy, far more powerful then the SMAC, which is something like 56 gigatons.

Thus, a single shot from an Assault Carrier could gut a Star Destroyer, maybe even an SSD, depending on where the shot landed.

Now the Super Carrier is even stronger.

Case in point: Star Wars weapons DO NOT strike with nuclear force!


Go to Wookiepedia if you wish to learn the numbers. If you say it's not canon, you have no proof. CGI WAS NOT great in the 80's. The reason it does not show the massive damage is becuase the Armor of the ships can match the strength of the damamge it takes. Plasma would not even do anything to a Star Destroyer.

Honestly, I can get you as much facts as you want, The Covenant would go down faster than the insurrectionist would go against the Covenant. You can't deny it. Movies cannot show spectacular ship battles. Watch Episode 3 and notice the mayhem. There is not much of a massive explosions of such because the armor can absorb the rounds.

Covenant ships cannot. You lose.



Well, Covenant might be able to put up a fight, same with UNSC. However their ships probably wouldn't be able to handle as much punishment.

Though, a kinda fun fact concerning the "Movies override all other canon." bit. It sounds like he is trying to go "Movies = only canon." while true the Movies are the 'hard canon' it is the same with Halo. The games are the 'hard canon'. So, going off of "hard canon" forerunner ships have no weaponry, Precursors don't exist, and the fuel rod gun doesn't blow massive chunks out of somebody went struck by a round...

If EU elements are put in, then both sides get 'EU' elements. (Even though technical journals/books made to go along the movies aren't truly EU, and Star Destroyer.net uses those manuals as well as other calculations from the movies and books.)

Edit: When is an assault carrier mentioned destroying a 3 km rock?

[Edited on 03.08.2011 7:42 AM PST]

  • 03.08.2011 7:25 AM PDT


Posted by: teekuppi
When it comes to small fighters star wars wins the fight easily. I know that Slave 1 isnt popular ship that isnt mass produced, but just giving as example what SW reaches in power of small fighters.

Slave 1:

Main guns: 64000 GW (2 kilotons per shot, 480 rpm firing rate onscreen in AOTC for time-averaged power output rather than peak output)

Missiles: 190 megatons (tail-launched missiles; seismic charge mines are roughly 12000 megatons)

Sublight acceleration: 2500G

Operational range: not stated (however, Obi-Wan's starfighter has an operational range of 150,000 light-years, and is probably similar).

Shield heat dissipation: not stated (however, Amidala's personal yacht has shield dissipation of 2 billion GW peak, and is probably similar)

Asteroid destruction: Jango Fett's seismic charges destroy asteroids in a radius of 5-10 km in AOTC.

Reactor power: not stated (however, Amidala's personal yacht has power output of 7 billion GW max, and is probably similar)

Max hyperspace speed: not stated (however, same-day flight from core to galactic outer-rim systems requires speeds in excess of 10 million c)

---

So halo, tell me. Does UNSC, Flood or covenant have any starfighter sized ship, that can be compared to this in power? I highly doubt that any of your fighters fire 190 megaton missiles. Hell, I even doubt that most of the UNSC cruisers archer missile have such strength.

Alone Sun crusher could destroy most important planets of UNSC and covenant. But, sun crusher is super weapon so I guess we will leave out of this.


OMG, the flood would crash into your ships, infect ur crew, and then we would have your shipd.
and yes, flood would have made it all the way to ur ships, they have infinite units,

  • 03.08.2011 8:21 AM PDT



Everything about this is wrong

1) the strength of the turbolaser has been considered to be completely debunked by the movies and their superior canon. They are in fact no more powerful then the artillery used on battleships in WWII.

2) A Covenant Assault Carrier's plasma torpedoes vaporized a 3 kilometer in diameter asteroid with one shot. For perspective, it was calculated vaporizing a 20 meter asteroid a little bit quicker would put that kind of power at a terraton of energy, far more powerful then the SMAC, which is something like 56 gigatons.

Thus, a single shot from an Assault Carrier could gut a Star Destroyer, maybe even an SSD, depending on where the shot landed.

Now the Super Carrier is even stronger.

Case in point: Star Wars weapons DO NOT strike with nuclear force!


  • 03.08.2011 8:25 AM PDT


Posted by: red alert447
OMG, the flood would crash into your ships, infect ur crew, and then we would have your shipd.
and yes, flood would have made it all the way to ur ships, they have infinite units,


Flood is more likely to infect the UNSC and Covenant ships before anything else.

  • 03.08.2011 8:35 AM PDT

halo would win because we have SPARTANS. Also because all star wars "jedi" have swords basically. yeah lets see you deflect a 50 cal. BULLET

  • 03.08.2011 8:49 AM PDT


Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: red alert447
OMG, the flood would crash into your ships, infect ur crew, and then we would have your shipd.
and yes, flood would have made it all the way to ur ships, they have infinite units,


Flood is more likely to infect the UNSC and Covenant ships before anything else.


Ok, but you forgot the fact HALO vs Star Wars, that means Flood shall fight on our side.

  • 03.08.2011 8:57 AM PDT


Posted by: red alert447

Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: red alert447
OMG, the flood would crash into your ships, infect ur crew, and then we would have your shipd.
and yes, flood would have made it all the way to ur ships, they have infinite units,


Flood is more likely to infect the UNSC and Covenant ships before anything else.


Ok, but you forgot the fact HALO vs Star Wars, that means Flood shall fight on our side.


And your plan is entirely dependent upon the flood REACHING the Star Wars ships.

  • 03.08.2011 8:59 AM PDT


Posted by: Ragster360
halo would win because we have SPARTANS. Also because all star wars "jedi" have swords basically. yeah lets see you deflect a 50 cal. BULLET


Seeing this made me want to fight for the Star wars fans here, because you are stupid as hell.
our bullets will melt. A lightsaber can deflect lazer, so what the f*** makes you think it wont deflect our bullets.

  • 03.08.2011 9:00 AM PDT


Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: red alert447

Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: red alert447
OMG, the flood would crash into your ships, infect ur crew, and then we would have your shipd.
and yes, flood would have made it all the way to ur ships, they have infinite units,


Flood is more likely to infect the UNSC and Covenant ships before anything else.


Ok, but you forgot the fact HALO vs Star Wars, that means Flood shall fight on our side.


And your plan is entirely dependent upon the flood REACHING the Star Wars ships.


No, when did i say that. And after all, as ROBERTO jh said


1) the strength of the turbolaser has been considered to be completely debunked by the movies and their superior canon. They are in fact no more powerful then the artillery used on battleships in WWII.

2) A Covenant Assault Carrier's plasma torpedoes vaporized a 3 kilometer in diameter asteroid with one shot. For perspective, it was calculated vaporizing a 20 meter asteroid a little bit quicker would put that kind of power at a terraton of energy, far more powerful then the SMAC, which is something like 56 gigatons.

Thus, a single shot from an Assault Carrier could gut a Star Destroyer, maybe even an SSD, depending on where the shot landed.

Now the Super Carrier is even stronger.

Case in point: Star Wars weapons DO NOT strike with nuclear force!

  • 03.08.2011 9:03 AM PDT

Brains beats brawn get used to it

Fear the Red Comet

Variety is the spice of life.
Long live games.
Death to all fanboys.


Posted by: Ragster360
halo would win because we have SPARTANS. Also because all star wars "jedi" have swords basically. yeah lets see you deflect a 50 cal. BULLET


You're joking right? You realize that lasers travel significantly faster than bullets. If Jedi can deflect lasers they sure as hell can intercept and fry bullets with ease.

  • 03.08.2011 9:44 AM PDT

Flood's and Universe's Warhammer 40k fanatic and the one who knows much about it.

I also like House Stark and winter, hurr.

and yes, flood would have made it all the way to ur ships, they have infinite units

You realise, that you would need to get your flood to our cruisers ( or star fighters, would you like to tell me how_are_you_going_to catch a slave-1 for example?) somehow through the void of the space? How are going to achieve it?

Also, infinity is impossible to achieve. I get your point still that there are a lot flood forces, but they can be countered by droids, which seem to be vastly superior in combat, only advantage for flood is that they can bring life to dead.

  • 03.08.2011 10:48 AM PDT


Posted by: teekuppi
and yes, flood would have made it all the way to ur ships, they have infinite units

You realise, that you would need to get your flood to our cruisers ( or star fighters, would you like to tell me how_are_you_going_to catch a slave-1 for example?) somehow through the void of the space? How are going to achieve it?

Also, infinity is impossible to achieve. I get your point still that there are a lot flood forces, but they can be countered by droids, which seem to be vastly superior in combat, only advantage for flood is that they can bring life to dead.


Another major problem here. Since the flood are not infecting UNSC or Covenant forces, that means they have to infect the Star Wars forces. Thus meaning they are nothing more then infection forms and very limited in number.

  • 03.08.2011 10:52 AM PDT