Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Who would win a space battle, Star Wars or Halo?
  • Subject: Who would win a space battle, Star Wars or Halo?
Subject: Who would win a space battle, Star Wars or Halo?

Halo, only because forerunner tech would beat the -blam!- out of ANY star wars craft.

  • 03.09.2011 6:10 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

"Time was your ally human. But now it has abandoned you. The Forerunners....have returned. And this tomb... is now yours". - The Didact

This is getting out of hand.

First of all the reason why we use forerunners and precursors is because they are the strongest of Halo alongside the flood and ancient races like Humans.

Forerunner ground forcs have firepower larger then base delta zero0.

If ground forces are that strong,imagine their starships.A single Forerunner starship destroyed a 30000 km large ring with a single shot.

Forerunner tech>>>>>>>><<star wrs

I haven't much time now,more will come...

  • 03.09.2011 7:08 AM PDT

This is getting out of hand.

First of all the reason why we use forerunners and precursors is because they are the strongest of Halo alongside the flood and ancient races like Humans.

Forerunner ground forcs have firepower larger then base delta zero0.

If ground forces are that strong,imagine their starships.A single Forerunner starship destroyed a 30000 km large ring with a single shot.

Forerunner tech>>>>>>>><<star wrs

I haven't much time now,more will come...

This

[Edited on 03.09.2011 7:22 AM PST]

  • 03.09.2011 7:20 AM PDT

Hey, B.net

i'm a nice guy, doesn't troll and loves Bungie. I enjoy playing video games, usualy shooters and a bit of horror , Dead Space, Halo, Gears of War, Halo, Battlefeild, did i mention Halo ? Lol. Anyways, "invest in realestate, always eat breakfast, all the chicks on the internet are ACTUALLY DUDES, and never buy the extended warrenty on anything, EVER !"

sincerely

-Tuckers little accident


Posted by: DecepticonCobra
Posted by: Stewie2552

Posted by: DecepticonCobra
Posted by: Sierra 1993DJC

Posted by: DecepticonCobra
Star Wars overwhelmingly. They've mastered individual combat spacecraft, X-Wings, TIE Fighters, etc, given them shields and can transport away in hyperspace.

You don't know much about Halo do you?

Explain.


Longsword, shortsword, Saber, Vulture, banshees, Vampires etc.

X-Wings, Y-Wings, A-Wings, B-Wings, TIE Fighters, TIE Advanced Fighters, TIE Predators, TIE Bomber, etc.

Point?
MAC cannon, SHIVA nukes, FENRIS WARHEADS, HALO array, ect.

point

  • 03.09.2011 7:53 AM PDT

Hey, B.net

i'm a nice guy, doesn't troll and loves Bungie. I enjoy playing video games, usualy shooters and a bit of horror , Dead Space, Halo, Gears of War, Halo, Battlefeild, did i mention Halo ? Lol. Anyways, "invest in realestate, always eat breakfast, all the chicks on the internet are ACTUALLY DUDES, and never buy the extended warrenty on anything, EVER !"

sincerely

-Tuckers little accident

how many MAC rounds you think it would take to blow up the death star?.....

  • 03.09.2011 7:56 AM PDT


Posted by: tuckers baby

Posted by: DecepticonCobra


X-Wings, Y-Wings, A-Wings, B-Wings, TIE Fighters, TIE Advanced Fighters, TIE Predators, TIE Bomber, etc.

Point?
MAC cannon, SHIVA nukes, FENRIS WARHEADS, HALO array, ect.

point


Wow, I never knew those were small craft/fighters!

[Edited on 03.09.2011 8:31 AM PST]

  • 03.09.2011 8:30 AM PDT


Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: tuckers baby

Posted by: DecepticonCobra


X-Wings, Y-Wings, A-Wings, B-Wings, TIE Fighters, TIE Advanced Fighters, TIE Predators, TIE Bomber, etc.

Point?
MAC cannon, SHIVA nukes, FENRIS WARHEADS, HALO array, ect.

point


Wow, I never knew those were small craft/fighters!

He never said,

  • 03.09.2011 8:55 AM PDT

Flood's and Universe's Warhammer 40k fanatic and the one who knows much about it.

I also like House Stark and winter, hurr.

Precursor vs EVERYTHING starwars universe have to throw in= precursor victory

Good luck killing the force. I hope that you arent expecting, that such thing could be accomplished.

Didnt we still decide that forerunners and precursors are out of this duel, as are every super weapon from SW? If we add them then Halo is going propably win.

And if this changes from space fighting to verse vs verse war, then it is impossible to win star wars. Simple answer is, that you would need to kill force to succeed at it, and that is as I already said, impossible to accomplish.

[Edited on 03.09.2011 9:05 AM PST]

  • 03.09.2011 8:55 AM PDT


Posted by: red alert447

Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: tuckers baby

Posted by: DecepticonCobra


X-Wings, Y-Wings, A-Wings, B-Wings, TIE Fighters, TIE Advanced Fighters, TIE Predators, TIE Bomber, etc.

Point?
MAC cannon, SHIVA nukes, FENRIS WARHEADS, HALO array, ect.

point


Wow, I never knew those were small craft/fighters!

He never said,


He inputted those things into a 'quote tree' talking about Star Wars having better single-craft/starfighters.

MAC cannons, nukes (SHIVA and FENRIS are nukes), and the halo array are not starfighters, and are definitely not small-craft.

  • 03.09.2011 9:11 AM PDT

While you're busy reading this, I have made my daring escape!

Star Wars.

  • 03.09.2011 9:14 AM PDT


Posted by: teekuppi
Precursor vs EVERYTHING starwars universe have to throw in= precursor victory

Good luck killing the force. I hope that you arent expecting, that such thing could be accomplished.

Didnt we still decide that forerunners and precursors are out of this duel, as are every super weapon from SW? If we add them then Halo is going propably win.

And if this changes from space fighting to verse vs verse war, then it is impossible to win star wars. Simple answer is, that you would need to kill force to succeed at it, and that is as I already said, impossible to accomplish.

1. if you read my post you will see that i only said IF we take precursors and forerunners we would win.
If we hold them out, it will fall to superior tactics.

  • 03.09.2011 9:31 AM PDT


Posted by: hotshot revan II
This is getting out of hand.

First of all the reason why we use forerunners and precursors is because they are the strongest of Halo alongside the flood and ancient races like Humans.

Forerunner ground forcs have firepower larger then base delta zero0.

If ground forces are that strong,imagine their starships.A single Forerunner starship destroyed a 30000 km large ring with a single shot.

Forerunner tech>>>>>>>><<star wrs

I haven't much time now,more will come...


Really your example of the power of the forerunner's ships is that they could destroy a ring. The humans did that and they are the weakest faction. Not ancient humans the humans from 2552.

Also I thought it was decided a while ago that we were leaving out the forerunners and precursors because the Star Wars fans have been leaving out their super weapons and a lot of their factions.

  • 03.09.2011 9:35 AM PDT


Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: red alert447

Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: tuckers baby

Posted by: DecepticonCobra


X-Wings, Y-Wings, A-Wings, B-Wings, TIE Fighters, TIE Advanced Fighters, TIE Predators, TIE Bomber, etc.

Point?
MAC cannon, SHIVA nukes, FENRIS WARHEADS, HALO array, ect.

point


Wow, I never knew those were small craft/fighters!

He never said,


He inputted those things into a 'quote tree' talking about Star Wars having better single-craft/starfighters.

MAC cannons, nukes (SHIVA and FENRIS are nukes), and the halo array are not starfighters, and are definitely not small-craft.

Yeah but he never said MAC cannon, SHIVA nukes, FENRIS WARHEADS, HALO array is starfighters
And shortsword, Longsword, Vampire, Seraph,Tarasque Heavy Fighter, Type-27 XMF(a banshee type, sabre(non-cannon)
Kestrel, AC-220 gunship(vulture) sparrowhawk,skyhawk fighter,Pelican(armed with nukes)


source: http://halo.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Covenant_Ships
http://halo.wikia.com/wiki/Category:UNSC_Vehicles
U happy now?

  • 03.09.2011 9:44 AM PDT

Red Alert, MAC cannons, nukes, and the halo array do not make Halo have an upper hand in small-craft/starfighters.

That is what the quote tree was talking about. It's like saying one nation has better infantry then the other, so the opposing side brings in TANKS to 'prove they are better.'

  • 03.09.2011 9:46 AM PDT


Posted by: Recovery 25

Posted by: hotshot revan II
This is getting out of hand.

First of all the reason why we use forerunners and precursors is because they are the strongest of Halo alongside the flood and ancient races like Humans.

Forerunner ground forcs have firepower larger then base delta zero0.

If ground forces are that strong,imagine their starships.A single Forerunner starship destroyed a 30000 km large ring with a single shot.

Forerunner tech>>>>>>>><<star wrs

I haven't much time now,more will come...


Really your example of the power of the forerunner's ships is that they could destroy a ring. The humans did that and they are the weakest faction. Not ancient humans the humans from 2552.

Also I thought it was decided a while ago that we were leaving out the forerunners and precursors because the Star Wars fans have been leaving out their super weapons and a lot of their factions.

HAHAHAHAHAHA, superweapons from SW cant compare with Precursors.
Why should we keep anything out, it's in the haloverse,
SPACE BATTLE, precursors had ships, THE END

  • 03.09.2011 9:46 AM PDT

Longsword, Vampire, Seraph,Tarasque Heavy Fighter, Type-27 XMF(a banshee type, sabre(non-cannon)
Kestrel, AC-220 gunship(vulture) sparrowhawk,skyhawk fighter,Pelican(armed with nukes)

AND precursor fighters, forerunner fighters
U HAPPY?

  • 03.09.2011 9:48 AM PDT

"I may not be perfect, but always been true."

How is the Sabre non-canon?

  • 03.09.2011 9:49 AM PDT


Posted by: red alert447
Longsword, Vampire, Seraph,Tarasque Heavy Fighter, Type-27 XMF(a banshee type, sabre(non-cannon)
Kestrel, AC-220 gunship(vulture) sparrowhawk,skyhawk fighter,Pelican(armed with nukes)

AND precursor fighters, forerunner fighters
U HAPPY?


We don't know the firepower for either. Forerunners and Precursors have been removed from the battle same as ALL Star Wars super-weapons. There are NO "IWIN" buttons here.

  • 03.09.2011 9:51 AM PDT


Posted by: RKOSNAKE
How is the Sabre non-canon?


It never existed, just made up by Bungie.
It only appears in Reach, 343i have declared Reach non-cannon.

  • 03.09.2011 9:52 AM PDT


Posted by: red alert447

Posted by: RKOSNAKE
How is the Sabre non-canon?


It never existed, just made up by Bungie.
It only appears in Reach, 343i have declared Reach non-cannon.



Halo blind fanboy alert (Been going off for a while now) 343 has Reach as canon. They have never said otherwise, and even have videos on waypoint talking about the battle of Reach (Using information from the books AND the game.)

  • 03.09.2011 9:53 AM PDT

"I may not be perfect, but always been true."


Posted by: red alert447

Posted by: RKOSNAKE
How is the Sabre non-canon?


It never existed, just made up by Bungie.
It only appears in Reach, 343i have declared Reach non-cannon.


Hmmm mind giving me a link or something to this declaration? Because as far as I know, everything made by Bungie up to this point has been canon, considering THEY created this Universe.

  • 03.09.2011 9:54 AM PDT


Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: red alert447
Longsword, Vampire, Seraph,Tarasque Heavy Fighter, Type-27 XMF(a banshee type, sabre(non-cannon)
Kestrel, AC-220 gunship(vulture) sparrowhawk,skyhawk fighter,Pelican(armed with nukes)

AND precursor fighters, forerunner fighters
U HAPPY?


We don't know the firepower for either. Forerunners and Precursors have been removed from the battle same as ALL Star Wars super-weapons. There are NO "IWIN" buttons here.

We have been told that they have more advanced thec,
Precursor could travel between galaxies, its pretty obvious that they have a few starfighters that could pown ur ass.
The only reason you deny this, is because you know that Precursors and forerunners= HALO win SW lose. You dont want to lose therefore you deni all precursor and forerunner tech

  • 03.09.2011 9:56 AM PDT


Posted by: RKOSNAKE

Posted by: red alert447

Posted by: RKOSNAKE
How is the Sabre non-canon?


It never existed, just made up by Bungie.
It only appears in Reach, 343i have declared Reach non-cannon.


Hmmm mind giving me a link or something to this declaration? Because as far as I know, everything made by Bungie up to this point has been canon, considering THEY created this Universe.

You are trolling, right?
Bungie only made the games...

  • 03.09.2011 9:58 AM PDT


Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: red alert447

Posted by: RKOSNAKE
How is the Sabre non-canon?


It never existed, just made up by Bungie.
It only appears in Reach, 343i have declared Reach non-cannon.



Halo blind fanboy alert (Been going off for a while now) 343 has Reach as canon. They have never said otherwise, and even have videos on waypoint talking about the battle of Reach (Using information from the books AND the game.)

Yeah, and i am yoda.
AND you are highest skill: 15 Good work, you are awsome, so good

[Edited on 03.09.2011 10:07 AM PST]

  • 03.09.2011 9:59 AM PDT

"I may not be perfect, but always been true."


Posted by: red alert447

Posted by: RKOSNAKE

Posted by: red alert447

Posted by: RKOSNAKE
How is the Sabre non-canon?


It never existed, just made up by Bungie.
It only appears in Reach, 343i have declared Reach non-cannon.


Hmmm mind giving me a link or something to this declaration? Because as far as I know, everything made by Bungie up to this point has been canon, considering THEY created this Universe.

You are trolling, right?
Bungie only made the games...

Bungie made the Halo Universe. I guess you're going to say but da bookz?!?!!! well, guess what? Bungie had to approve the books were canon before they could be released.

  • 03.09.2011 10:01 AM PDT