- Phoenix1330
- |
- Fabled Legendary Member
Duracell.
I don't keep going and going and going and...
but i Start, and just don't Stop.
So what if the saxophone is black?
it has better tone the the gold one.
damn straight i play Jazz.
Posted by: ExquisiteDragon
Posted by: lonepaul2441
Posted by: ExquisiteDragon
Posted by: lonepaul2441
Fair enough but the US should not be there end of story. Its between China and the other countries that have disputes, this is why people don't like America because it sticks its nose in anywhere its not needed.Think of it this way, China will destroy everything they have in their sights and then annex it all to boost their agenda. China has said they will not resort to military actions to solve the disputes.
And America has expanded themselves so they are a little hypocritical. China has never expanded outside its bordered in its whole existence I can't see why the would start now with dozens of countries that can stop them.China says versus China does. And it's not like their population situation is getting any better. Look, all the U.S. is doing is being cautious and I approve. What I think LonePaul is trying to say here is that the US probably shouldn't be the aggressor in any war right now, hence they shouldn't take any aggressive posturing on any country's part as reason for military intervention.
The US, for their own sake, especially with Russian/Chinese tensions with NATO over Syria, should let another country take the first shot. Wait for Russia or China to attack a NATO country, call their bluff if you will. Or worst case scenario, wait for a NATO country, other than the US, one that is seen in a different light around the globe, make the first move with intervention before the US steps in.
The US holds alot of political sway in the world, but with that sway comes strong opinions about the US. If Turkey were to invade Syria, it would likely have less of a resounding impact around the political world than, if say, the US would. While much of Russia's and China's posturing is directed at NATO as a whole, the US making the first move is a much bigger spark to start a fire than the US coming to it's ally's aid when they are in need.
The US should be involved in the middle east crisis' but should hold onto a back seat and let other countries take the lead in all 3 conflicts. Give the world the view that it is ALL of the world wanting change, not just a US force backed by the power of it's allies.
[Edited on 06.28.2011 10:23 AM PDT]