- CTN 0452 9
- |
- Exalted Legendary Member
Have you seen my mind anywhere? I seem to have lost it...
0x0 x0x 0x0 000 000 x0x 000
x0x 0x0 0x0 0xx 000 0x0 000
x0x x0x x00 0xx 0x0 x0x 0x0
I have seen you future
Posted by: Son Of Mountains
Posted by: CTN 0452 9
Posted by: Son Of Mountains
they were army, and not augmented and indoctrinated from a young age, which explains why Master Chief outperforms all of them
The reason that the Spartan IIs outperform the Spartan IIIs is that the Spartan IIs were selected by more rigorous genetic requirements, were given more augmentations and were given MJOLNIR armor.
The Spartan IIIs were meant to be cheaper. They were selected from a broader gene pool, were given fewer augmentations (improved survival during the process) and were only issues SPI armor (with several exceptions). That is why the SIIs were better, not what branch they reported to.
reread my post, where i say "not augmented and indoctrinated from a young age"
in other words, yes. i agree.
You are correct in your assertions, except for two points.
One, they were trained (indoctrinated) from a young age and two, they were augmented, just with different augmentations than the Spartan IIs.