By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.
Posted by: therealFlyboy
Posted by: LIVE freak out
Posted by: therealFlyboy
So the termials in halo 3 arn't from the perspective of the forruners? if you read the last one fast enough its a letter from one forerunner( or so i thought) to another talking about how this new world they are on lacks sentient life, but then mentions that the gate to the ark is hidden on it, (Earth) and how they are going to stay there, then in the book Harvest certain humans show up on the covenant equipment as what they beleive means relic but later we find out it means Reclaimer. back to halo 3, 343 Guilty spark adresses cheif as recaimer that he is inheritor to all they created, that he IS forerunner. so thats why i am confused
The terminals are from the perspective of a forerunner AI. Plus Spark is crazy, he thought Cheif was a specific Forerunner, not just a forerunner descendant
So why was the AI begging another forerunner to not use the ring? i mean i get the parts where all those #s like casualties and combat skins and stuff could be An AI. But what specific Forerunner did spark think MC was? and then theres the harvest stuff. it just doesn't add up
The Librarian and the Didact were actual Forerunners, not AIs. The Librarian begged the Didact to fire the Rings and let the war be over with but the Didact was stalling so she'd join him and be safe.
John isn't a Forerunner, Spark (in his rampant state) believes Reclaimers to be the same as Forerunners and cannot set the two apart.