Bungie Universe
This topic has moved here: Subject: Plausible theory as to why the UNSC weapons sandbox is so limited.
  • Subject: Plausible theory as to why the UNSC weapons sandbox is so limited.
Subject: Plausible theory as to why the UNSC weapons sandbox is so limited.

Don't worry, you're still your mom's favorite Bnet member.

Warning: If your attention span cannot read a post for more than thirty seconds, leave this thread now. There will be no tl;dr.

I often see people on the Universe and Reach forums complaining that the UNSC's military weapons, vehicles and technology are inadequate to todays technology in some respects. I think I may have found a reasonable solution to why this is.

As we all now, Earth's governments are ruled under the umbrella and overwatch of the UN in 2552. And we also know that the UNSC rules with one military faction.

In today's world, if a crisis erupts in a country, they may call upon the UN for military assistance. The UN can respond in a military fashion in two categories:
1. Collective Security
2. Peacekeeping
Collective Security is simple enough to understand. If a non-agressor country that has not harmed its attackers, is invaded, the UN can send troops to defensively protect that country. The goal here is defeating the aggressors. A great example of this is when Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990. Kuwait called upon the UN, and collectively UN countries worked together to defeat Iraq.

Peacekeeping is different. If there is a crisis in a country between two or more parties, the UN can send in troops. One of the parties must call on the UN for help, the UN cannot send troops in in either of these scenarios without being asked. While with Collective Security the goal is to defeat the enemy, the goal in Peacekeeping is to stop the bloodshed altogether. A good example of this would be the UN's interference in Rwanda.

Some of you may be asking "Muffin, where the hell are you going with this?". Well here it is.

As of today, there is no permanent UN military. When the UN does interfere in a military fashion, the UN borrows troops donated from its members for a temporary amount of time.

Now think about this: How terribly inadequate would it be if the troops from all the countries arrived with different weapons? Some troops show up with M16's, others with Uzi's, and others with another rifle? This system would make no sense so instead the UN receives the troops and gives them all standard weapons.

My theory is that as the UN slowly began to take over power, weapons used became more and more standardized until redundant weapons simply fizzled out. So basically one Sniper Rifle, one Rocket, one automatic rifle, etc, was all the UN needed and that's all they made.

  • 04.26.2011 12:16 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?

humans were more focused on colonizing than warfare, which is the best and most true answer.

  • 04.26.2011 12:17 PM PDT

___.............._______/```````````````:::--.
|.==,-.~;. ____:._______ __’__’__’_ _ _\===
|................--:---:--:--‘---:,, ,,, ,,, ,,,:---: /=
`-.,.__._._,,...---:::"
Halo Waypoint Stats

Two words: Global recession.

  • 04.26.2011 12:17 PM PDT

"A LIE is a LIE"


- Truly intelligent and deep Black ops trailer


Posted by: SHOCKER1000
Two words: Global recession.


Global? Wouldn't it be called intergalactic recession?

  • 04.26.2011 12:20 PM PDT

Don't worry, you're still your mom's favorite Bnet member.

Posted by: Pipboy 3050
Posted by: SHOCKER1000
Two words: Global recession.


Global? Wouldn't it be called intergalactic recession?
Technically it would be interstellar, as intergalactic implies more than one galaxy.

  • 04.26.2011 12:21 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Deva Path


Posted by: DecepticonCobra

We are all going to get banned aren't we?


Posted by: Pipboy 3050

Posted by: SHOCKER1000
Two words: Global recession.


Global? Wouldn't it be called intergalactic recession?


humans don't occupy enough space to use the word galaxy relating in any of their affairs.

  • 04.26.2011 12:22 PM PDT

Bungie is the best.

I agree with grey101.

  • 04.26.2011 12:28 PM PDT

WALL OF SHAME-Posting stupidity since 2010
__________________
Posted by: Maximus Decimus
Agreed. All the changes are good and add variety. Do we really want another Halo 3? Just running around with one gun and no armor abilities? It's good that 343 wants to try something new. Do we really want the same thing for three more games?

Posted by: MegaMuffin16
Posted by: Pipboy 3050
Posted by: SHOCKER1000
Two words: Global recession.


Global? Wouldn't it be called intergalactic recession?
Technically it would be interstellar, as intergalactic implies more than one galaxy.
Or interplanetary.

  • 04.26.2011 12:48 PM PDT

WALL OF SHAME-Posting stupidity since 2010
__________________
Posted by: Maximus Decimus
Agreed. All the changes are good and add variety. Do we really want another Halo 3? Just running around with one gun and no armor abilities? It's good that 343 wants to try something new. Do we really want the same thing for three more games?

Posted by: Sigma617
Well of course we know of at least a dozen different variants of our familiar firearms... It is 541 years in the future. Maybe we've built the best base firearm we can?

In Halo canon the M6 series sidearm is nearly 2 centuries old.
Oh please.

Where are my prototype railguns, sir?

  • 04.26.2011 1:15 PM PDT

today there is many manufactures who make weapons.
the UNSC maybe had monopoly, and where the only ones who could make weapons, and only made what they needed

  • 04.26.2011 1:21 PM PDT

maybe each gun has a lot of attachments and variants, and we only see a few ingame

  • 04.26.2011 2:03 PM PDT

"A LIE is a LIE"


- Truly intelligent and deep Black ops trailer

There isnt one automatic rifle.

The MA5k carbine is another example of an assault rifle, there's probably more we just dont know about.

  • 04.26.2011 2:04 PM PDT

Posted by: NavG123
Posted by: MegaMuffin16
Posted by: Pipboy 3050
Posted by: SHOCKER1000
Two words: Global recession.


Global? Wouldn't it be called intergalactic recession?
Technically it would be interstellar, as intergalactic implies more than one galaxy.
Or interplanetary.

intragalactic

  • 04.26.2011 2:06 PM PDT