Bungie Universe
This topic has moved here: Subject: Halo vs Star Wars. Who wins?
  • Subject: Halo vs Star Wars. Who wins?
Subject: Halo vs Star Wars. Who wins?

"Find where the liar hides, so that I may place my boot between his gums!" - Rtas 'Vadum

Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron
Yeah Spartan, and why does the Star Wars universe suddenly have sound in it?

I thought that he was just using that as an analogy to describe what happens when something with "The Force" (which is essentially an extra law of physics) comes onto contact with one which does not have it.

Or maybe not...

  • 05.05.2011 1:52 PM PDT


Posted by: anton1792
Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron
Yeah Spartan, and why does the Star Wars universe suddenly have sound in space?

I thought that he was just using that as an analogy to describe what happens when something with "The Force" (which is essentially an extra law of physics) comes onto contact with one which does not have it.

Or maybe not...


Edited mine to make sense with the cut-off quotes :P.

Maybe... but why not just outright say it?

  • 05.05.2011 1:55 PM PDT


Posted by: CarlosPrime92
Posted by: Zergania

There is no escaping a Halo ring.


Are you for real? If they fired the Halo ring it would kill everything leaving NO-ONE to win.

Star Wars wins hands down.

And for you Forerunner fanboys boasting about numbers... The Star Forge can amass limitless amounts of Huge Fleets out of nothing!

Now this thread is over.


Which is why the Republic lost the battle of the Star Forge, correct?

Try this: a Forerunner containment fleet consisted of "trillions of vigallants," most of them likely automated warships. All of them with planet breaking weapons (for perspective, the smallest known Forerunner warship was 1km long and called a "Planet Breaker." A Forerunner Sentinel in Origins I had a weapon calculated at 10 gigatons and so on.)

It took the Republic a fleet of about ten or so warships (and a little help from Bastilla) to smash the Forge's defenses and destroy it.

  • 05.05.2011 1:56 PM PDT


Posted by: BullHorn

Posted by: teekuppi

Posted by: hotshot revan II


How does drinking a pool that gives you everything you want to know of SW universe history a victory against Halo?

And about limitless powers,in what?





it was said to offer limitless power.



And I strongly believe that those powers are force based, even though quote doesnt tell it. FoP is in force realm and is tainted by dark side of the force, so what else's power it would give? Also, I've heard people saying on SD.net that those powers are force based.


Posted by: hotshot revan II


Regardless even if all Sith gain their full potential power,the Forerunner will still stomb them hard.




Limitless power is greater power then forerunner's weaponry. Forerunner's weaponry is limited to certain amount of power/destructibility. In short: limitless power > limited power.

And how are Forerunner's going to beat force sensitives inside 'Beyond shadows', if they dont actually know its existence?

[quote]Exactly, how do you defend against something that has a non-physical connection to EVERY FREAKIN OBJECT? Yes, light is not an object, but the armor, ships, and people are. You can't stop a non-physical attack except by something non-physical. I'm fairly sure that the Forerunners don't have anything like that.


Okay, try this: how does any amount of power destroy something that cannot be destroyed? The only way to stop the Precursors is to either be one of them or become a God (which results in the eternal conundrum paradox).

So now you're saying that Star Wars' rules apply to Halo as well?

Okay, imagine the Gravemind with full control over the Force. Or the Precursors with control over it.

See you can't just say that any kind of source of limitless knowledge applies to knowledge on Halo as well simply because you say it can. It gives it the full knowledge of the SW universe; no where in the official canon is Halo ever mentioned. In fact, Earth doesn't even officially exist in SW.

So all this infinite power crap cannot be truly considered. If the infinite power pool or whatever has ever been used as you say it does, then the history of Wars ends because nothing could oppose him/her. If it has been used, then a way was found to stop him/her, because the only alternitive is Wars ends. This would mean it does not grant infinite power, merely great power.

Like how the Celestials had "infinite knowledge of the universe, they're unstoppable!" Okay...how did the Rakatans kill them off then?

[Edited on 05.05.2011 2:10 PM PDT]

  • 05.05.2011 2:09 PM PDT


Posted by: ROBERTO jh
Like how the Celestials had "infinite knowledge of the universe, they're unstoppable!" Okay...how did the Rakatans kill them off then?


You mean, like how to kill a precursor you had to be one of them or gods, yet the Forerunners killed them all?

Way to shoot yourself in the damn foot.

Edit: I read both articles. Guess what? The only people who had a chance to use both refused it. Because they were jedi and both items are dark-side corrupted.

[Edited on 05.05.2011 2:20 PM PDT]

  • 05.05.2011 2:12 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Yes I'm fairly young. No, that doesn't mean I'm automatically dumber than you or have less life experience, thats just generally the case. I am not your general case.

Posted by: SC Matt Klassen
Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: SC Matt Klassen
Weaponry hasn't been explored far enough in the Halo universe to know what the Forerunner could do to the Empire but we do know the Forerunner fell to the Flood and the Empire could easily expel the vermin before it was too late.
You just derped. HARD. A single Promethean can slag entire continents with a single shot. And that's one person in a Forerunner battlesuit. When a small contingent of Forerunner marines destroy planets... Stormtroopers are going to fall faster than they can be produced. I'm waiting for Cryptum 2/3 to explain HOW the Forerunners lost to the Flood.


I'm just sorry, but I call that bull-blam!- and if it's true, then forerunners get thrown out of the window because they are being used as "lulzIwin!1!1!1"

LOL. Read Cryptum. It explains everything. The Forerunners are peaceful...until they're provoked. Then everything goes to hell. Cryptum took the Forerunners and threw them up the technological ladder to the level of the Culture.
Hell, they could build a TARDIS if they wanted to.

Forerunner infantry weapons can not slag continents. I think the author meant that the weapons wielded by the two races (forerunner and human) were so powerful that continuous combat of the period of several hours pretty much destroyed the continents surface.

  • 05.05.2011 2:17 PM PDT


Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: ROBERTO jh
Like how the Celestials had "infinite knowledge of the universe, they're unstoppable!" Okay...how did the Rakatans kill them off then?


You mean, like how to kill a precursor you had to be one of them or gods, yet the Forerunners killed them all?

Way to shoot yourself in the damn foot.


Difference: Celestials were never-- ever --proven to actually have infinite power. In fact, nor were the Precursors ever proven to be killed off by the Forerunners.

As well, if the Forerunner thing is true, the Forerunners had access to the Precursors weapons. It'd be like a human, but with all the powers of God. You're a lot better off with His powers then without.

Take the Star Trek Voyager episode with the Q civil war for example. Humans defeated the Q because they had access to their weaponry. Forerunners theoretically defeated the Precursors because they had access to Neural Physics technology.

Think before you post.

  • 05.05.2011 2:24 PM PDT


Posted by: That Atheist
Forerunner infantry weapons can not slag continents. I think the author meant that the weapons wielded by the two races (forerunner and human) were so powerful that continuous combat of the period of several hours pretty much destroyed the continents surface.


This sounds far more reasonable then what those guys were saying.

The constant fighting between the two forces destroying a continent surface is more likely then one infantryman going "lul going to slag this entire place by myself in a few minutes."

  • 05.05.2011 2:24 PM PDT

In fact, has the precursors EVER been proven to be that powerful?

  • 05.05.2011 2:30 PM PDT


Posted by: That Atheist
Posted by: SC Matt Klassen
Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: SC Matt Klassen
Weaponry hasn't been explored far enough in the Halo universe to know what the Forerunner could do to the Empire but we do know the Forerunner fell to the Flood and the Empire could easily expel the vermin before it was too late.
You just derped. HARD. A single Promethean can slag entire continents with a single shot. And that's one person in a Forerunner battlesuit. When a small contingent of Forerunner marines destroy planets... Stormtroopers are going to fall faster than they can be produced. I'm waiting for Cryptum 2/3 to explain HOW the Forerunners lost to the Flood.


I'm just sorry, but I call that bull-blam!- and if it's true, then forerunners get thrown out of the window because they are being used as "lulzIwin!1!1!1"

LOL. Read Cryptum. It explains everything. The Forerunners are peaceful...until they're provoked. Then everything goes to hell. Cryptum took the Forerunners and threw them up the technological ladder to the level of the Culture.
Hell, they could build a TARDIS if they wanted to.

Forerunner infantry weapons can not slag continents. I think the author meant that the weapons wielded by the two races (forerunner and human) were so powerful that continuous combat of the period of several hours pretty much destroyed the continents surface.


That scene from Cryptum where the Forerunners do this was simply to put down a rebellion, not to fight a war. It was finished in a few hours. The battle was fought with fighter craft, aerial artillery turrets and infantry (supposedly). The entire planet was ravaged beyond recognition.

Now consider this. The Stardestroyer.net calculaor puts the detonation of the PoA at about 10 petatons based on the depiction in Halo 2. The Flood book states the Ring was hardly damaged at all by the explosion, that only a 5 kilometer crater was gouged. The Ring was destroyed by the centrifuges getting thrown of balance, resulting on the internal stress of this massive structure ripping itself apart.

In Cryptum, a Ring is shot by a Forerunner fortress with only a few shots, where deep canyon like gouges are torn into the side, resulting in the Ring becoming obliterated. This happens twice.

  • 05.05.2011 2:31 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Yes I'm fairly young. No, that doesn't mean I'm automatically dumber than you or have less life experience, thats just generally the case. I am not your general case.

Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron
In fact, has the precursors EVER been proven to be that powerful?

No, just that they left behind was uber-powerful, meaning they most likely were. I still think Star Wars would win for being way over powered and having a huge advantage in numbers.

  • 05.05.2011 2:32 PM PDT


Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron
In fact, has the precursors EVER been proven to be that powerful?


Born states several times the Precursors make the Forerunners look like cave men, and that Precursor artifacts are 100% indestructable to anything short of a Neural Physics weapon, or "eternal" as he calls them.

And I've already proven with one movie example that Star Wars is not that powerful ship-wise.

[Edited on 05.05.2011 2:36 PM PDT]

  • 05.05.2011 2:33 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

How about it takes them twenty shots to hit someone.

  • 05.05.2011 2:34 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Yes I'm fairly young. No, that doesn't mean I'm automatically dumber than you or have less life experience, thats just generally the case. I am not your general case.


Posted by: SC Matt Klassen
Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: SC Matt Klassen
Weaponry hasn't been explored far enough in the Halo universe to know what the Forerunner could do to the Empire but we do know the Forerunner fell to the Flood and the Empire could easily expel the vermin before it was too late.[/quote]
You just derped. HARD. A single Promethean can slag entire continents with a single shot. And that's one person in a Forerunner battlesuit. When a small contingent of Forerunner marines destroy planets... Stormtroopers are going to fall faster than they can be produced. I'm waiting for Cryptum 2/3 to explain HOW the Forerunners lost to the Flood.[/quote]

I'm just sorry, but I call that bull-blam!- and if it's true, then forerunners get thrown out of the window because they are being used as "lulzIwin!1!1!1"

LOL. Read Cryptum. It explains everything. The Forerunners are peaceful...until they're provoked. Then everything goes to hell. Cryptum took the Forerunners and threw them up the technological ladder to the level of the Culture.
Hell, they could build a TARDIS if they wanted to.

Forerunner infantry weapons can not slag continents. I think the author meant that the weapons wielded by the two races (forerunner and human) were so powerful that continuous combat of the period of several hours pretty much destroyed the continents surface.


That scene from Cryptum where the Forerunners do this was simply to put down a rebellion, not to fight a war. It was finished in a few hours. The battle was fought with fighter craft, aerial artillery turrets and infantry (supposedly). The entire planet was ravaged beyond recognition.

Now consider this. The Stardestroyer.net calculaor puts the detonation of the PoA at about 10 petatons based on the depiction in Halo 2. The Flood book states the Ring was hardly damaged at all by the explosion, that only a 5 kilometer crater was gouged. The Ring was destroyed by the centrifuges getting thrown of balance, resulting on the internal stress of this massive structure ripping itself apart.

In Cryptum, a Ring is shot by a Forerunner fortress with only a few shots, where deep canyon like gouges are torn into the side, resulting in the Ring becoming obliterated. This happens twice.

Yes but you have to remember that those were not the same rings featured in the Halo games, they were prototypes and if Forerunner weapons and equipment evolve the way we think they do, then the second set of rings would be far more powerful. Also, ten petatons would destroy a Jupiter sized planet. Theres no need for a weapon of that magnitude, as even if the forerunners could hypothetically create shields to withstand such an impact, the force of the impact alone would vaporise the ship underneath the shield.
Also, the planet Charum Hakkor was not destroyed in battle but instead by the firing of one of the original Halo rings on low power. The planet was heavily damaged by the combination of Human and Forerunner weapons, yes, but it was not destroyed an rendered uninhabitable.

  • 05.05.2011 2:37 PM PDT


Posted by: ROBERTO jh

Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron
In fact, has the precursors EVER been proven to be that powerful?


Born states several times the Precursors make the Forerunners look like cave men, and that Precursor artifacts are 100% indestructable to anything short of a Neural Physics weapon, or "eternal" as he calls them.

And I've already proven with one movie example that Star Wars is not that powerful ship-wise.


Actually, you just went "Nope! the numbers LIE BECAUSE THIS ONE SCENE!"

As started before. This topic went from Covenant vs empire to "Lul we KNOW we'll lose therefore we MUST bring in forerunner and precursors!"

Just like the last few ones.

  • 05.05.2011 2:41 PM PDT


Posted by: That Atheist

Posted by: SC Matt Klassen
Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: SC Matt Klassen
Weaponry hasn't been explored far enough in the Halo universe to know what the Forerunner could do to the Empire but we do know the Forerunner fell to the Flood and the Empire could easily expel the vermin before it was too late.[/quote]
You just derped. HARD. A single Promethean can slag entire continents with a single shot. And that's one person in a Forerunner battlesuit. When a small contingent of Forerunner marines destroy planets... Stormtroopers are going to fall faster than they can be produced. I'm waiting for Cryptum 2/3 to explain HOW the Forerunners lost to the Flood.[/quote]

I'm just sorry, but I call that bull-blam!- and if it's true, then forerunners get thrown out of the window because they are being used as "lulzIwin!1!1!1"

LOL. Read Cryptum. It explains everything. The Forerunners are peaceful...until they're provoked. Then everything goes to hell. Cryptum took the Forerunners and threw them up the technological ladder to the level of the Culture.
Hell, they could build a TARDIS if they wanted to.

Forerunner infantry weapons can not slag continents. I think the author meant that the weapons wielded by the two races (forerunner and human) were so powerful that continuous combat of the period of several hours pretty much destroyed the continents surface.


That scene from Cryptum where the Forerunners do this was simply to put down a rebellion, not to fight a war. It was finished in a few hours. The battle was fought with fighter craft, aerial artillery turrets and infantry (supposedly). The entire planet was ravaged beyond recognition.

Now consider this. The Stardestroyer.net calculaor puts the detonation of the PoA at about 10 petatons based on the depiction in Halo 2. The Flood book states the Ring was hardly damaged at all by the explosion, that only a 5 kilometer crater was gouged. The Ring was destroyed by the centrifuges getting thrown of balance, resulting on the internal stress of this massive structure ripping itself apart.

In Cryptum, a Ring is shot by a Forerunner fortress with only a few shots, where deep canyon like gouges are torn into the side, resulting in the Ring becoming obliterated. This happens twice.

Yes but you have to remember that those were not the same rings featured in the Halo games, they were prototypes and if Forerunner weapons and equipment evolve the way we think they do, then the second set of rings would be far more powerful. Also, ten petatons would destroy a Jupiter sized planet. Theres no need for a weapon of that magnitude, as even if the forerunners could hypothetically create shields to withstand such an impact, the force of the impact alone would vaporise the ship underneath the shield.
Also, the planet Charum Hakkor was not destroyed in battle but instead by the firing of one of the original Halo rings on low power. The planet was heavily damaged by the combination of Human and Forerunner weapons, yes, but it was not destroyed an rendered uninhabitable.


Haqlo was never fired on Hakkor.....or even built yet.

I'm talking about the battle of the Prophet homeworld.

See the Forerunners hated with all their hearts anyone who dared offend them. Their weapons were constructed to fit the role of extermination. Which is why they're so -blam!- ing powerful.

Edit: have to go for now.

[Edited on 05.05.2011 2:42 PM PDT]

  • 05.05.2011 2:41 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Yes I'm fairly young. No, that doesn't mean I'm automatically dumber than you or have less life experience, thats just generally the case. I am not your general case.



Posted by: That Atheist

Posted by: SC Matt Klassen
Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron

Posted by: SC Matt Klassen
Weaponry hasn't been explored far enough in the Halo universe to know what the Forerunner could do to the Empire but we do know the Forerunner fell to the Flood and the Empire could easily expel the vermin before it was too late.[/quote]
You just derped. HARD. A single Promethean can slag entire continents with a single shot. And that's one person in a Forerunner battlesuit. When a small contingent of Forerunner marines destroy planets... Stormtroopers are going to fall faster than they can be produced. I'm waiting for Cryptum 2/3 to explain HOW the Forerunners lost to the Flood.[/quote]

I'm just sorry, but I call that bull-blam!- and if it's true, then forerunners get thrown out of the window because they are being used as "lulzIwin!1!1!1"[/quote]
LOL. Read Cryptum. It explains everything. The Forerunners are peaceful...until they're provoked. Then everything goes to hell. Cryptum took the Forerunners and threw them up the technological ladder to the level of the Culture.
Hell, they could build a TARDIS if they wanted to.

Forerunner infantry weapons can not slag continents. I think the author meant that the weapons wielded by the two races (forerunner and human) were so powerful that continuous combat of the period of several hours pretty much destroyed the continents surface.


That scene from Cryptum where the Forerunners do this was simply to put down a rebellion, not to fight a war. It was finished in a few hours. The battle was fought with fighter craft, aerial artillery turrets and infantry (supposedly). The entire planet was ravaged beyond recognition.

Now consider this. The Stardestroyer.net calculaor puts the detonation of the PoA at about 10 petatons based on the depiction in Halo 2. The Flood book states the Ring was hardly damaged at all by the explosion, that only a 5 kilometer crater was gouged. The Ring was destroyed by the centrifuges getting thrown of balance, resulting on the internal stress of this massive structure ripping itself apart.

In Cryptum, a Ring is shot by a Forerunner fortress with only a few shots, where deep canyon like gouges are torn into the side, resulting in the Ring becoming obliterated. This happens twice.

Yes but you have to remember that those were not the same rings featured in the Halo games, they were prototypes and if Forerunner weapons and equipment evolve the way we think they do, then the second set of rings would be far more powerful. Also, ten petatons would destroy a Jupiter sized planet. Theres no need for a weapon of that magnitude, as even if the forerunners could hypothetically create shields to withstand such an impact, the force of the impact alone would vaporise the ship underneath the shield.
Also, the planet Charum Hakkor was not destroyed in battle but instead by the firing of one of the original Halo rings on low power. The planet was heavily damaged by the combination of Human and Forerunner weapons, yes, but it was not destroyed an rendered uninhabitable.


Haqlo was never fired on Hakkor.....or even built yet.

I'm talking about the battle of the Prophet homeworld.

See the Forerunners hated with all their hearts anyone who dared offend them. Their weapons were constructed to fit the role of extermination. Which is why they're so -blam!- ing powerful.

Edit: have to go for now.

First of all, don't you remember the point in the book were Didact and Born are talking about the firing off the Halo on Charum Hakkor?
And I didn't realize you meant the San Shyuum battle. Yes that was a primarily infantry battle but the Forerunners were not able to defeat the Prophets until the firing of the Halo ring, so they mustn't have been able to do that much damage, not to mention equipping an infantry unit with a weapon the power of which you are stating is silly, as all it would do is lead to the biggest friendly fire incident in history.

  • 05.05.2011 2:45 PM PDT


Posted by: ROBERTO jh

Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron
In fact, has the precursors EVER been proven to be that powerful?


Born states several times the Precursors make the Forerunners look like cave men, and that Precursor artifacts are 100% indestructable to anything short of a Neural Physics weapon, or "eternal" as he calls them.

And I've already proven with one movie example that Star Wars is not that powerful ship-wise.


Born can state that they were all powerful, but without specs that statement is invalid and completely null in void to the entire topic.

And quite honestly a "movie" example? Because of one scene you judge all of the starwars ships? You sir fail at providing a vaild arguement, Specs of the ships would of been more accurate and with numbers alone can you actually determine what's more powerful.

Example, A mac cannon shell can go through the shielding on an imperial class star destroyer. How do I know? Ship stats and Specs. But because of their slow recharge and the fact that they need to aim the entire front of the ship, it would prove to be an ineffective way to fight the empire in naval combat because the turbo lasers would rip a UNSC ship in two because of the mere fact that they are more powerful, and the recharge is a few seconds and not five to ten minutes.

[Edited on 05.05.2011 2:49 PM PDT]

  • 05.05.2011 2:47 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Yes I'm fairly young. No, that doesn't mean I'm automatically dumber than you or have less life experience, thats just generally the case. I am not your general case.

Posted by: Devils Preists

Posted by: ROBERTO jh

Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron
In fact, has the precursors EVER been proven to be that powerful?


Born states several times the Precursors make the Forerunners look like cave men, and that Precursor artifacts are 100% indestructable to anything short of a Neural Physics weapon, or "eternal" as he calls them.

And I've already proven with one movie example that Star Wars is not that powerful ship-wise.


Born can state that they were all powerful, but without specs that statement is invalid and completely null in void to the entire topic.

And quite honestly a "movie" example? Because of one scene you judge all of the starwars ships? You sir fail at providing a vaild arguement, No specs of the ships is more accurate and with numbers alone can you actually determine what's more powerful.

Example, A mac cannon shell can go through the shielding on an imperial class star destroyer. How do I know? Ship stats and Specs. But because of their slow recharge and the fact that they need to aim the entire front of the ship, it would prove to be an ineffective way to fight the empire in naval combat because the turbo lasers would rip a UNSC ship in two because of the mere fact that they are more powerful, and the recharge is a few seconds and not five to ten minutes.

Just because, i will correct you and say that the recharge time is two and a half minutes. I still think Star Wars would win though.

  • 05.05.2011 2:50 PM PDT


Posted by: That Atheist
Posted by: Devils Preists

Posted by: ROBERTO jh

Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron
In fact, has the precursors EVER been proven to be that powerful?


Born states several times the Precursors make the Forerunners look like cave men, and that Precursor artifacts are 100% indestructable to anything short of a Neural Physics weapon, or "eternal" as he calls them.

And I've already proven with one movie example that Star Wars is not that powerful ship-wise.


Born can state that they were all powerful, but without specs that statement is invalid and completely null in void to the entire topic.

And quite honestly a "movie" example? Because of one scene you judge all of the starwars ships? You sir fail at providing a vaild arguement, No specs of the ships is more accurate and with numbers alone can you actually determine what's more powerful.

Example, A mac cannon shell can go through the shielding on an imperial class star destroyer. How do I know? Ship stats and Specs. But because of their slow recharge and the fact that they need to aim the entire front of the ship, it would prove to be an ineffective way to fight the empire in naval combat because the turbo lasers would rip a UNSC ship in two because of the mere fact that they are more powerful, and the recharge is a few seconds and not five to ten minutes.

Just because, i will correct you and say that the recharge time is two and a half minutes. I still think Star Wars would win though.


Thank-you for that correction good sir, I honestly had no clue as too the exact length it would take for a mac canon to recharge. I made an estimate. :P

  • 05.05.2011 2:54 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Yes I'm fairly young. No, that doesn't mean I'm automatically dumber than you or have less life experience, thats just generally the case. I am not your general case.

Posted by: Devils Preists

Posted by: That Atheist
Posted by: Devils Preists

Posted by: ROBERTO jh

Posted by: Cmdr DaeFaron
In fact, has the precursors EVER been proven to be that powerful?


Born states several times the Precursors make the Forerunners look like cave men, and that Precursor artifacts are 100% indestructable to anything short of a Neural Physics weapon, or "eternal" as he calls them.

And I've already proven with one movie example that Star Wars is not that powerful ship-wise.


Born can state that they were all powerful, but without specs that statement is invalid and completely null in void to the entire topic.

And quite honestly a "movie" example? Because of one scene you judge all of the starwars ships? You sir fail at providing a vaild arguement, No specs of the ships is more accurate and with numbers alone can you actually determine what's more powerful.

Example, A mac cannon shell can go through the shielding on an imperial class star destroyer. How do I know? Ship stats and Specs. But because of their slow recharge and the fact that they need to aim the entire front of the ship, it would prove to be an ineffective way to fight the empire in naval combat because the turbo lasers would rip a UNSC ship in two because of the mere fact that they are more powerful, and the recharge is a few seconds and not five to ten minutes.

Just because, i will correct you and say that the recharge time is two and a half minutes. I still think Star Wars would win though.


Thank-you for that correction good sir, I honestly had no clue as too the exact length it would take for a mac canon to recharge. I made an estimate. :P

You are welcome.

  • 05.05.2011 3:07 PM PDT

Well the forerunners do have a fleet that is in the MILLIONS. Also Precursor tech is virtually indestructable.

  • 05.05.2011 3:40 PM PDT

Welcome to bungie, you have no rights. play nice!
CLICK!

Funny, in a factpile, people agreed halo would win.

  • 05.05.2011 3:47 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

SC = Supreme Commander/Supreme Canadian.

De Facto leader of the military of the APE (Allied Planets Empire).

Coup = Admiral Asskicker, ZPM hive ship

Posted by: Sniffy66
Well the forerunners do have a fleet that is in the MILLIONS. Also Precursor tech is virtually indestructable.

Millions? Think over trillions.

  • 05.05.2011 4:10 PM PDT