- mojeda101
- |
- Intrepid Legendary Member
Posted by: FinishingFUEGO
As for the difference in firepower,really? ENTIRE Covenant fleet taking YEARS to glass a planet? WTF man what have you been reading? Star Wars has no fire superiority here. UNSC/Covie weapons will easily be capable of destroying Empire vessels.MACs, pulse lasers, nukes, energy projectors - all will burn the Imps from the skies - especially when guided by superior AI targeting.Get Out. You know nothing of Star Wars. Base Delta Zero.
3 Star Destroyers blew the atmosphere clear off the planet Dankayo and slagged the surface after less than an hour. Only reason it took 3 that long to do so was because each was performing double duty of bombardment and blockade, a single ISD could have done it but that would have left the other side of the planet free to evacuate while the side the ISD was pounding was atomized.
UNSC and Covenant weapons wouldn't do much at all really. ISS, ship shields are dual layered, with ray shielding (that stops energy weapons) and particle shielding (that stops mass drivers which are MAC Cannons) that could hold out against superior weapons(Turbolasers) for hours.
Your little Hyperspace trick is cute, but ever heard of the word drone? The Empire tend to have one at their destination prior to stopping. Besides, Hyperdrive is faster than Covenant Slipspace, Covenant ships can reach 912 light years per day but Hyperdrive can travel 150,000 light years per day if not faster depending on the grade and route.
Oh and if you didn't know, the MAC is the strongest firepower the UNSC can muster, a Turbolaser is four times stronger, add to the fact that they have dozens of them on their ships that fire with a fire rate MUCH faster.
Any ship the Empire run into would be gutted in a few seconds, even a Super Carrier.
Imaging having A turbolaser(4 MAC's) along with about 19 others firing with dual barrels or could be three, at a rate of one shot per second? They are gone. End of story.
[Edited on 09.05.2011 11:35 AM PDT]