Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Which game would you rather have, Reach or Halo 2?
  • Subject: Which game would you rather have, Reach or Halo 2?
Subject: Which game would you rather have, Reach or Halo 2?

sounds like you have no skill on reach. missing halo 2 cause of your glitchn.

  • 05.18.2011 5:06 PM PDT

Posted by: Joker 420frick
sounds like you have no skill on reach. missing halo 2 cause of your glitchn.

LOL. If you legitimately believe reach takes more skill than H2 you have a screw loose.

  • 05.18.2011 5:26 PM PDT

Crouching Bunny Hidden Shotty

I have both te he

  • 05.18.2011 5:28 PM PDT

Life is like a clogged toilet. It's full of crap until you do something about it.

I don't speak Karate!

I'm afraid I never played Halo 2. That's why I'm not voting.

  • 05.18.2011 5:29 PM PDT

I've gotta say, I actually love reach believe it or not; but I also am a big fan of halo 2.

p.s. Check my kd and stats I'm actually decent; I know the thought is uncomprehendable huh.

  • 05.18.2011 5:29 PM PDT

i have all of them aha

  • 05.18.2011 5:31 PM PDT

Halo 3 with Reach's netcode.

I never got to play Halo 2 online in its prime, and I find Reach meh.

  • 05.18.2011 5:33 PM PDT

Octavia is best pony.

Posted by: ParagonRenegade

Posted by: TehWarMoose
Posted by: Ridin Dirtym99
Wow... Wow at you people. Have you no shame? This poll shouldnt even be close. Halo 2 4EVA!!!


Sure, if you would like to have your eardrums blasted out by a generic rock band than O'Donell's sweeping classical soundtrack.


The three games with orchestral OST's (Reach, ODST & 3) were the best............. Coincidence?


I think not.

  • 05.18.2011 5:34 PM PDT

i have 5 killionares on reach the best u have is 4 killtaculars i have a screw loose. u need your head fixed. i'll dance around you on h2.

  • 05.18.2011 5:38 PM PDT

This is Not my real gamertag my real gamertag is PCNYY6990
which is alot better but i forgot my really old email password so i made a new one so i could have a bungie account.

i personally think reach is better. people that say its full of randomness and overpowered weapons are the people that play with just that, people that said theres no skill involved, well, obviously they cant shoot so they bash the game to make themselves feel better, halo 2 was fun but reach in my opinion is better, multi-player has way more options and now has fun playlists like action sack to keep you having fun if you dont feel like being competitive, and when people say reach is trying to be like cod, well their obviously retarded and cant tell the difference between 2 completely different things, like apples to monkeys, no relation whatsoever, just cus some new things were added that may remind you of something that you've seen before doesnt mean its copied, it means bungies thinking of newer things while you people sit at home on your ass bashing things. they were both good games and it should be left at that.

  • 05.18.2011 5:49 PM PDT

Posted by: Joker 420frick
i have 5 killionares on reach the best u have is 4 killtaculars i have a screw loose. u need your head fixed. i'll dance around you on h2.

Well done you play griffball :/
My killtaculars are in real matchmaking not gravity hammers with opponents on no shield.

The fact that you think a medal shows you are a good player shows how bad you really are. Search a pros gamertag, they most likely don't have a killionaire but are 10 times better than you. you play more than me and are still worse so kudos to you there.
You've lost 1/2 your games and have a K/D below 1. I have a K/D of almost 3 and win WELL over 1/2 my games. I don't see the relevance in your post though.

I have played games competitively, earned money from games, and also tested gametypes for MLG. I have a much larger understanding than you about what makes a competetive title.

  • 05.18.2011 5:51 PM PDT

I will probably offend you

Posted by: DARK4NGEL
Posted by: Joker 420frick
sounds like you have no skill on reach. missing halo 2 cause of your glitchn.

LOL. If you legitimately believe reach takes more skill than H2 you have a screw loose.


There are far more variables in Reach, thus more to keep tabs on, more to think about, and more to comprehend.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I believe that it takes far more skill to maintain a multitude of aspects and variables than it does to maintain several.

  • 05.18.2011 5:52 PM PDT

!

Halo 2.

  • 05.18.2011 5:53 PM PDT

Posted by: DARK4NGEL
Posted by: Joker 420frick
i have 5 killionares on reach the best u have is 4 killtaculars i have a screw loose. u need your head fixed. i'll dance around you on h2.

Well done you play griffball :/
My killtaculars are in real matchmaking not gravity hammers with opponents on no shield.

The fact that you think a medal shows you are a good player shows how bad you really are. Search a pros gamertag, they most likely don't have a killionaire but are 10 times better than you. you play more than me and are still worse so kudos to you there.
You've lost 1/2 your games and have a K/D below 1. I have a K/D of almost 3 and win WELL over 1/2 my games. I don't see the relevance in your post though.

I have played games competitively, earned money from games, and also tested gametypes for MLG. I have a much larger understanding than you about what makes a competetive title.


burn. but really joker, you seem to be pretty awful at halo. go play some griffball

  • 05.18.2011 5:59 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

well, if halo 2 gets online, yes. definitely. First, I'd rather not delete halo 2 from the face of the earth, because it built online gaming and defined the console fps, and is still delightful to play (but even more before it went offline for obvious reasons). Now halo reach, is a load of bull-blam!- mixed together into an abominable ball, but at least bungie got to stick in a few crystals, but still isn't enough to win me over.

  • 05.18.2011 5:59 PM PDT

Posted by: X SCC LEGACY X
i personally think reach is better. people that say its full of randomness and overpowered weapons are the people that play with just that, people that said theres no skill involved, well, obviously they cant shoot so they bash the game to make themselves feel better, halo 2 was fun but reach in my opinion is better, multi-player has way more options and now has fun playlists like action sack to keep you having fun if you dont feel like being competitive, and when people say reach is trying to be like cod, well their obviously retarded and cant tell the difference between 2 completely different things, like apples to monkeys, no relation whatsoever, just cus some new things were added that may remind you of something that you've seen before doesnt mean its copied, it means bungies thinking of newer things while you people sit at home on your ass bashing things. they were both good games and it should be left at that.

Not really. I play with top players and rarely lose on halo reach. The reason I think it takes barely any skill is that my school friends for one don't completely suck at it and the majority of the competitive community stopped playing due to the random outcomes.
Bungie didn't come up with new things. they ran out of ideas so just lifted things from other games.
They lost most of their idea makers on the series which is why the game is so stale and has much less people playing than that of halo 3.

  • 05.18.2011 5:59 PM PDT

"Were it so easy..."

I vote Reach for one reason, and one reason alone.

New Team Classic Playlist > Halo 2.

  • 05.18.2011 6:00 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Elder Legendary Member


Posted by: DARK4NGEL
Posted by: X SCC LEGACY X
i personally think reach is better. people that say its full of randomness and overpowered weapons are the people that play with just that, people that said theres no skill involved, well, obviously they cant shoot so they bash the game to make themselves feel better, halo 2 was fun but reach in my opinion is better, multi-player has way more options and now has fun playlists like action sack to keep you having fun if you dont feel like being competitive, and when people say reach is trying to be like cod, well their obviously retarded and cant tell the difference between 2 completely different things, like apples to monkeys, no relation whatsoever, just cus some new things were added that may remind you of something that you've seen before doesnt mean its copied, it means bungies thinking of newer things while you people sit at home on your ass bashing things. they were both good games and it should be left at that.

Not really. I play with top players and rarely lose on halo reach. The reason I think it takes barely any skill is that my school friends for one don't completely suck at it and the majority of the competitive community stopped playing due to the random outcomes.
Bungie didn't come up with new things. they ran out of ideas so just lifted things from other games.
They lost most of their idea makers on the series which is why the game is so stale and has much less people playing than that of halo 3.


His theory fails anyway. My friends and I all got multiple Onyx ranks for the first 3 seasons of Reach. We were also level 50's on Halo 3 and level 37's (legit) on Halo 2. Halo 2 takes far more skill than Reach, and the better players can see that just as much, if not more, than others. Saying that bad players dislike Reach is complete nonsense. It's the other way around!

[Edited on 05.18.2011 6:04 PM PDT]

  • 05.18.2011 6:03 PM PDT


Posted by: LEGEND ST
I vote Reach for one reason, and one reason alone.

New Team Classic Playlist > Halo 2.
You mean Team Grenade Spam? I don't see how you can like it, it isn't a good fit with the amount of grenades thrown, and huge emphasis on CQC (see: Rat Race).

  • 05.18.2011 6:04 PM PDT


Posted by: DARK4NGEL
Posted by: X SCC LEGACY X
i personally think reach is better. people that say its full of randomness and overpowered weapons are the people that play with just that, people that said theres no skill involved, well, obviously they cant shoot so they bash the game to make themselves feel better, halo 2 was fun but reach in my opinion is better, multi-player has way more options and now has fun playlists like action sack to keep you having fun if you dont feel like being competitive, and when people say reach is trying to be like cod, well their obviously retarded and cant tell the difference between 2 completely different things, like apples to monkeys, no relation whatsoever, just cus some new things were added that may remind you of something that you've seen before doesnt mean its copied, it means bungies thinking of newer things while you people sit at home on your ass bashing things. they were both good games and it should be left at that.

Not really. I play with top players and rarely lose on halo reach. The reason I think it takes barely any skill is that my school friends for one don't completely suck at it and the majority of the competitive community stopped playing due to the random outcomes.
Bungie didn't come up with new things. they ran out of ideas so just lifted things from other games.
They lost most of their idea makers on the series which is why the game is so stale and has much less people playing than that of halo 3.


the quote "Nothing new under the sun" comes into play here... bungie thought they could attract COD fanboys by adding COD like abilities in reach...

  • 05.18.2011 6:04 PM PDT

ya i've seen your sevice record nothing there thats inpressive my k/d is low cause im not the only one who plays on my gamer tag cause i go to work 5-6 dayz a week. in that time my girlfriend or the kidds come over and play but if u wanna go an talk big send me a friend reqest an get ur best vs my best.. ps try get yourself a killionar in griff ball at least one.

  • 05.18.2011 6:04 PM PDT

Posted by: Spartanic Ghost
There are far more variables in Reach, thus more to keep tabs on, more to think about, and more to comprehend.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I believe that it takes far more skill to maintain a multitude of aspects and variables than it does to maintain several.

Not really more isn't better. This is why CoD 4 is so much better than the recent CoDs and MLG always tries to simplify the settings.

The less luck involved the more skill is involved.
Posted by: Sir Yancelot
burn. but really joker, you seem to be pretty awful at halo. go play some griffball

Not really, i have placed at LAN events and have most probably got the most 50s out of anybody in this thread, have onyx on reach (not that it matters) and have earned thousands of pounds from gaming.

  • 05.18.2011 6:05 PM PDT


Posted by: Joker 420frick
ps try get yourself a killionar in griff ball at least one.
Lol.

  • 05.18.2011 6:06 PM PDT

Posted by: DARK4NGEL
Posted by: Spartanic Ghost
There are far more variables in Reach, thus more to keep tabs on, more to think about, and more to comprehend.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I believe that it takes far more skill to maintain a multitude of aspects and variables than it does to maintain several.

Not really more isn't better. This is why CoD 4 is so much better than the recent CoDs and MLG always tries to simplify the settings.

The less luck involved the more skill is involved.
Posted by: Sir Yancelot
burn. but really joker, you seem to be pretty awful at halo. go play some griffball

Not really, i have placed at LAN events and have most probably got the most 50s out of anybody in this thread, have onyx on reach (not that it matters) and have earned thousands of pounds from gaming.


lol did you think i was calling you out on this? cause i was talking about joker, i dunno how good you are but you sound good if your making money from it

  • 05.18.2011 6:09 PM PDT

I am mediocre

Check out my Youtube Channel
Youtube channel name - XLGstudio

http://www.nooooooooooooooo.com/

Reach
HD Graffix
Moar weaponz
Theater
Forge
Bettar Customs
Armory
Challenges
Invasion
Firefight

Halo 2

nothing

other problems include OP BR,less ppl in MM, and no XBOX live compatable interface.

yes halo 2 had dual weild and a better campagin but Reach is wayy bettar

[Edited on 05.18.2011 6:13 PM PDT]

  • 05.18.2011 6:09 PM PDT