Halo: Combat Evolved Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: What guns need to be in H1HD
  • Subject: What guns need to be in H1HD
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: What guns need to be in H1HD
  •  | 
  • Exalted Legendary Member
  • gamertag: Zamlon
  • user homepage:

All my opinion.

Why would I make an entirely new topic in order to discuss this topic's contents?

OT: Splazer needs to gtfo, completely ruined vehicles.
H2 rocket would also ruin vehicles albeit to a lesser extent.
I don't recall a bayonet sniper ever appearing in the franchise and the idea by itself sounds dumb, to be blunt.
I wouldn't mind the H2 brute shot and concussion rifle because those aren't that bad.
BrutePR, the spiker, and the hammer are terrible and shouldn't appear. The first two are bad copies of the regular PR, the AR, and the SMGs except they're worse. I'm on edge about the hammer, it's mostly a bad sword carbon copy however it is more balanced with a smaller lunge in the games it appears. If H1 remake isn't noobified with melee lunge then I believe it should be included since its explosion effect could somewhat replace the lunge.

The AR either needs to be revamped or replaced. If the h3 SMG appears in the remake then the two guns will be too similar. If the smg reappears but the AR acts like the reach one then it'll be fine. And the pc flamethrower is a must as is the PC fuel rod with a less OP one, the H2 fuel rod.

  • 05.21.2011 8:09 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Noble Heroic Member

"A life lived for others is the only life worth living" - Albert Einstein

"I have your RCON right here." - Iggwilv

"Always my pleasure to be lazy." - InvasionImminent


Posted by: NILLOC

Posted by: Dr Syx

Posted by: NILLOC

Posted by: Dr Syx
Simply put as this, a remake is a remake. Not a new game. It's meant to remake the gameplay of the original game. Not be a "best of the best" Halo. In fact, Reach was meant to be that. (Not saying it is, just saying that's what it was designed to be)

I would just like some new guns in multiplayer. Or some of the good ones from past games. I'll admit my list was a bit much, but I just think it would improve the multiplayer. Halo 1's multiplayer was good at the time .But times have changed and I would like to see the multiplayer change as well. THE CAMPAIGN SHOULDN'T BE TOUCHED.
Again, like I said, "remake" not a "reimagining". You're not supposed to add new stuff to a remake. If I told you to repaint the Mona Lisa do you think I'd want you to paint her with blonde hair, blue eyes, some eyebrows, and in a bikini? No.

This sort of stuff belongs in a new Halo game, not a remake.


Yeah the campaign would be a remake but the multiplayer should be a reimagining
Why should only the Campaign be a remake? They're not going to remake just the Campaign and reimagine the multiplayer. That would be idiotic. Tons of people believe that Halo: Combat Evolved's multiplayer was the greatest multiplayer out of the series. A remake is for nostalgia, not for innovation.

  • 05.21.2011 8:53 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Intrepid Mythic Member
  • gamertag: bob570
  • user homepage:

R.I.P. Halo 2
11/9/04 - 4/15/10

- B( )B

Nilloc, I really think you just need to chill the -blam!- out. The point of a remake is to breath new life into something great yet often forgotten, innovation is for sequels.

  • 05.21.2011 11:39 PM PDT

Posted by: NILLOC
IF YOU DISAGREE THEN MAKE YOU OWN TOPIC INSTEAD OF POSTING IN HERE


People will post what they want. You don't get immunity from criticism.

[Edited on 05.22.2011 12:43 AM PDT]

  • 05.22.2011 12:36 AM PDT

Scandinavian Master Race!

My thoughts.

  • 05.22.2011 4:37 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I'm fine with all of that except for equipment. Never really liked equipment. If they put armor abilities in the new game, that would SUCK.

  • 05.22.2011 8:46 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2