- roraj 196
- |
- Exalted Member
Posted by: BobBQ
I read the first three novels and found them solidly mediocre. Fall of Reach and First Strike in particular were both rife with mistakes any competent editor should have picked up on.
If you're referring to canonical mistakes, then that would bring us to the game-book debate; which dictates Halo canon?
For me it's the games. I haven't read the books, and I'm sure if I did that I would hold them as fact. Still, I think the games overrule the books, though I think there should be further plot development in-game.
[Edited on 05.23.2011 1:01 PM PDT]