- Mike Huntt
- |
- Exalted Legendary Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Posted by: x Foman123 x
Posted by: jaythenerdkid
I definitely believe every wildly inflated claim ITT.
Weow kid, do you even lift?
Skype: au-simon
Posted by: Cobravert
Posted by: Mike Huntt
It's not the AR Beatdown that makes people bad, it's when people GO for AR beatdowns when it's not the best option. People use it as a crutch.
You'd be stupid not to use it in the right situation.2-3 years ago that would never have been said or agreed to by the BR Elitists.
If it's AR starts, it's not like you really had too much of an option. AR battles always ended up in a close quarters boxing match.Anyone good would agree that using the AR beatdown is a smart, viable option in the right circumstances.
However, when people (usually of lower skill) start using it as their main source of kills, that's when it gets a bit ridiculous. AR Beatdown is good for one thing; A quick, close-quarter kill.
In an AR start game, good players will go for the weapons that will allow them to pick off players that can't fight back (the players that haven't got a BR/Sniper/Carbine). Bad players will just make do with the AR, change their playstyle, and just rush the other team. Good players know that the AR is not a good primary weapon, and go for the BRs, carbines, snipers.
AR starts don't HAVE to be close quarters.. People just don't realise that staying back and picking off the kills is a much smarter option.