Halo: Combat Evolved Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: To all The idiots petitioning for multiplayer.
  • Subject: To all The idiots petitioning for multiplayer.
Subject: To all The idiots petitioning for multiplayer.

Actually it would not take long at all just take the code from Halo CE multiplayer and remake the maps.That's what they did for the single player.And they could have two teams working on multiplayer and single player getting things done twice as fast.

  • 06.14.2011 7:28 PM PDT

'life is a stare down with death himself'


Posted by: strictly187
Lol

Balance =/= fun. Proof? CoD.

Also, CE wasn't balanced (Pistol = game over) and it's multi is riding off of a decade old mechanics that should be fixed.

inb4urmadcuzurbad

I'm not. Challenge me, if you like.

it actually still is balanced. take it into account that everyone has a pistol. not just you. which means that the person your shooting at wost likley has a pistol.

besides, they couldn't put in multiplayer if they wanted to. the deadline is to close and only some of 343i is working on halo cea.

  • 06.14.2011 7:30 PM PDT

The original multiplayer wouldnt have lasted today. Most xbox live halo players today are kids who were still in diapers when the original came out. Theyre used to the way the multiplayer has pretty much been since halo 2. They wouldnt play it. Myself, being a halo player since 2002 when i first got a xbox, would not buy this remake for $60 which is what it would cost with its own multiplayer, and i know im not the only one. In 2001 whe the original halo was released people who didnt even play video games got into it due to the fact of it being one of the only great console fps at the time, whereas today (LIKE THEM OR NOT YOU KNOW ITS TRUE) games like Call of Duty, Battlefield, and even Gears, though its third person, sell so much more than halo does or even did at its peak. 343i knows all of this as well. They would much rather make a profit off of a game made for the few who like it the way it is than to lose money making a game for the perpetually unpleased halo community.

[Edited on 06.14.2011 11:46 PM PDT]

  • 06.14.2011 11:45 PM PDT


Posted by: skull56546
If they create a multiplayer it would kill halo reach and possibly halo 4

And why would that be a bad thing?

  • 06.16.2011 6:15 PM PDT


Posted by: DAJSK
Posted by: JohnyRL
What?
Posted by: DAJSK
Why do you think your better than everyone?
I don't know, it just seams like you think you are smatter than every one. Just let them make a petition for something that will never happen. Now that you called them idiots your starting stuff.

You're not an idiot, you're a little kid.

Also, "smatter"? Prepare for people to call you an idiot.

[Edited on 06.16.2011 6:26 PM PDT]

  • 06.16.2011 6:26 PM PDT

Um... so... I am confused of why anyone would say the pistol was unbalanaced. Let me put it this way... EVERYONE STARTS WITH ONE! It discouraged the following actions

Camping, Running in, and camping over powered weapons.

Lets face it, the current Halo was ONLY about camping the weapons. Everyone knows it. You cant say the Sword, Shotgun, Rocket, Sniper and Battle Rifle are all on equal plains... I cant imagine anyone arguing that.

Further more, the weapons were balanced in Halo 1 plasma guns slowed, the sniper was great for far away, the shotgun was great at close range. If you were stupid enough to rush in (something ALL Halo Reach fans seem to love) you died instantly because of the pistol. There was none of this run in and melee.

Further more, I would just like to say if bungie was trying to make the game more realistic with the battle rifle firing so poorly, then they definitely should have made it so your aim was worse if you used a jet pack. Anyways, bungie messed up big time when it took out the pistol. I am good at Halo Reach... and even I know the means of being good in Halo Reach requires far less skill than in Halo 1...

  • 07.06.2011 6:42 PM PDT