- grey101
- |
- Fabled Mythic Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Deva Path
Posted by: DecepticonCobra
We are all going to get banned aren't we?
Posted by: Dustin 6047
Halo 3 and Reach had great campaigns. You guys are childish for saying they're bad because you're trying to judge the games equally, but you reallize that Halo 1 and 2 had terrible graphix. So when you judge the games you say they are best so you think people will think your judgement has nothing to do with graphix when in reallity you're saying they're the best because you feel bad for the games having doo-doo graphix. All games actually put up 3 years of hard work, creativity, and originality.
@Moj ODST was an expansion not a game.
I am judging the game in itself. Halo 3 was rush,over hyped, and had a change in development; all of which effected the campaign story.
Halo 1 and 2 have good graphics for their age. i will even say the reason i pick halo CE over reach in terms of graphics is because halo CE had textures. something the newer games disregarded.
Hard work, creativity, and originality yet all you keep referring to are graphics. I and others couldn't careless for graphics it is the plot we are concerned about. It is kids like you would would play a game like crysis just becuase of its graphics yet whine about it not having a story.